Thy didn't zoom in further on any of the PS3 games. It was a fair test. the 360 and ps3 closeups are the same. The only noticeable difference that is actually worth noting, is Star Wars. The textures in the PS3 version look smudged in places, but crisper on the 360. Maybe Call of Duty looked more crisp o PS3 as well, and a little more desaturated on the 360. Besides these 2 things, I see no reason to do these graphical comparisons. Although I always find myself reading these comparison articles hoping there will be some difference. It's more interesting reading the replies below cuz of of them are ridiculous lol. Some people are really hell bent on proving why the system they own is the best. Like their opinion changes anyway.

to nnn2004, Good question lol. Part of me wonders if these comparison features are actaully worth looking at. So I tend to stop by and see if there is anything to be surpised about, which there never is, and also to kinda poke fun at how some people take these features so seriously lol.

I think gamespot should do a poll based on grpahical comparisons. They should list all of these comparison images side by side, without letting us know which is ps3 or 360, and we have to choose which image is better, or have an alternative..."I DONT FRIGGING CARE THEY LOOK THE ALMOST THE SAME, AND CHOOSING ONE WOULD MEAN I ACTUALLY HAVE NO LIFE WHATSOEVER!" I think I would opt for the alternative choice everytime lol.

Cherrytwister is the perfect example of a sad fanboy, who is so desperate for the playstation to succeed that even the most minor graphical improvement on a ps3 game over a 360 game obviously means the PS3 is BY FAR the superior machone, due to this one minor improvement. If anyone is arguing or deliberating over which machine looks better graphically, GO OUTSIDE and find yourself a life! The differences are so minor or completely worthless that they will not nor ever impede how a games plays. OMG MY BURNOUT FOR THE PS3 HAS A LITTLE MORE BLOOM LIGHTING THAN THE 360, THEREFORE IT IS THE BETTER GAME! PS3 KICKS 360S ASS BECASUE OF THIS!! Blah blah **** blah. Who gives a sh!t apart from sad fanboys looking for minor differences. At the end f the day its not how games look, its how they play. Some games on the frigging Atari 2600 are better than some next gen games today ffs. lol Now I am not bashing PS3 or 360 here. I am merely bashing fanboys who are desperate for one console to be better than another console, based on its software. Essentially the PS3 is the better machine hardware wise, but that means nothing, if the marketing, sales and advertIsing is complete bollocks. It doesn't matter what machine can theoretically do what, but moreso, what it is doing now. And from what it seems 360 and PS3 are almost identical with exception to a few minor insignificant nuances. By the way, cheerytwister, you make it sound like most games are being developed for the ps3 and ported to the 360. thats untrue, in fact its the other way about, becuase playstation has always been notoriously awkward or harder to develop games for, so the fact is, most cross platform games (fpr ps3 and 360) are being developed for the 360 first, as it is easier to develop for, then ported to the PS3. Graphical differences are nothing to phone home about. Who actually cares about one game looking slightly brighter than the other. Get a life.