After reading this thread I want to say: 1. Just cause you go to a laptop you don't lose the games now, (ten years ago definitely) But Laptops now can play anything the desktop can (minus all the candy). But for me being able to move my pc easily out weighs the extra graphic output. It's still the same game. That said, I have 2 laptops, (that I use) my gaming lappy is a 2.53 dual core intel with 4 gb memory and a 9800 gtx card with 1gb memory. good for the new games and can play them all. sure some compromises need to be made but nothing like 2000-2004 when lap top gaming was basically stuck where netbooks are now but htat was top of the line ggaming so now i can play my desktop games that i loved on a net book which vista wont reconize is great plus it can run for 7 + hrs and i can even watch at least 2 of 3 lord of the rings on a flight maybe the whole thing.
I actually get to go to pittsburgh and get up early to find a bar chair on carson street around 9 am for the game then hopefully it will be another street party circa the last superbowl win. btw I live in columbus Ohio but take the trip to experience it in the burg with like minded friends(who I havent meet yet)
Im curious. Why is it you don't think free retro games is a good idea. If people pay for **** you can get for free wouldvnot go for it. So buy your crap and debate the innane. Isn't it time they give something back. It'll never happen, but if they did I'd be the first on the wagon.
How is this for an example of being revolutionary. Allow people to download some of your (sony owned) ps1 and ps2 games for free. Yes you lose some revenue. But you just might sell some extra PS3s. Anyway, anyone with a PC and any familiarity with it can get emulators and the games for free anyway.
johnnyreb2565's comments