jayhadit's forum posts

Avatar image for jayhadit
jayhadit

337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 jayhadit
Member since 2006 • 337 Posts
Well, anyone who gives you an objective answer here will get flamed or modded, so maybe go and ask the people in system wars.donalbane
yes, let's all go to system wars to enjoy the objective thinking. Sarcasm center of brain failing..........
Avatar image for jayhadit
jayhadit

337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 jayhadit
Member since 2006 • 337 Posts
[QUOTE="RahKayne"][QUOTE="pimperjones"]Quit beating the dead horse already, its been discussed and proven in numerous threads that teh RSX is a crappy GPU, Sony knows this, gamers know this and so do developers. RSX is garbage compared to the xenos360 but the CELL is suppose to make up what the RSX lacks in power. How that'll pan out nobody knows, so far just in GPU alone the PS3 is getting thrashed by teh 360. Just look at the poor frame rates in Call of Duty 3. pimperjones


that's because it's a port from 360, if a game is made for a systemit'll most likely have better FPS than if it's ported to another no matter what kind of GPU. Plus devs making 360 games know how to use that hardware better, and have easier tools to work with, dunno how you expect them to do the same for the cell processor and bluray and the gpu, let alone they got the final dev kits months before PS3 actually came out.  You sound like you are from SW, so I'm not going to argue. 
RSX crap????
I don't have time to go into now.

Even the folks at Nvidia was inclined to admit that RSX is just a souped up 7800GTX. I love Sony and I love PS3 but Sony spent way too much money on the Cell and simply ran out when it came to GPU development. Call of Duty 3 is the only game out right now that can accurately portray the GPU strength of both systems as it runs on the brute strength of the graphics processor.

you shouldn't compare ported games. Devs have to make them all look similar....it's in the contract for the game.
Avatar image for jayhadit
jayhadit

337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 jayhadit
Member since 2006 • 337 Posts
To be honest, get a 360 and wait until better PS3 games come out to get a PS3.Logan832
I understand the reasoning, but buying a 400 dollar system to play games NOW, and then buying a 600 system LATER to play the games you want just seems a little stretched. I would buy a ps3 because i think it has the most potential out of the bunch. People that argue for the 360 say things like, "it has all these games right now..." and "the online is just sooo much better" both things that are caused due to the infancy of the system. people had to wait six months before the 360 had anything that would warrant a purchase....i guess what i'm trying to say is that if you want to buy two or more systems, do that...if you're only buying one, get a ps3.
Avatar image for jayhadit
jayhadit

337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 jayhadit
Member since 2006 • 337 Posts
I've beat it 4 times, twice in co op and twice in single player, now I'm trying to get all of the skill points, it's a little difficult, but always fun.AlMar12345
I'm trying to get all the skill points as well. I have yet to figure out how to make a bullseye trap to get the "twirly whirly" points. anybody care to explain this to me?
Avatar image for jayhadit
jayhadit

337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 jayhadit
Member since 2006 • 337 Posts
[QUOTE="BroweChisox"][QUOTE="jayhadit"][QUOTE="R-Dot-Yung"]Nop, progressive scan>iterlaced so much that 720p>1080i

people say that because 720p tvs are cheaper than 1080i tvs, and they feel they have to defend their purchase. If 1080i didn't look better, why would anyone have spent time developing it?

Actually, the cheapest tvs are 1080i since all CRTs do that resolution. It is a well accepted fact that 720p is the best resolution for gaming, and 1080i tends to be better for slower movies. All next-gen movies are recorded in 1080p which has both lower formats beat. The reason your 1080i set (which is probably pretty low end) looks better than your 720p set (which had to be even more low end) is due to the hardware and has nothing to do with the resolution. Your accusations that people are defending their purchase is poor, and you should try having a tiny bit of knowledge before making the same type of statement and just embarrassing yourself.

I have a 42" hitachi ultravision director's edition plasma. I don't see how I've embarrased myself by simply stating an opinion, and you seem to be strung pretty tightly on this topic. Maybe the best logical next step is to talk to your doctor about xanax.
Avatar image for jayhadit
jayhadit

337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 jayhadit
Member since 2006 • 337 Posts
oh, and if you couldn't tell, I had a 720p tv, and upgraded to a 1080i...and yes, every game i have looks better than before, at any speed.
Avatar image for jayhadit
jayhadit

337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 jayhadit
Member since 2006 • 337 Posts
[QUOTE="R-Dot-Yung"]Nop, progressive scan>iterlaced so much that 720p>1080i

people say that because 720p tvs are cheaper than 1080i tvs, and they feel they have to defend their purchase. If 1080i didn't look better, why would anyone have spent time developing it?
Avatar image for jayhadit
jayhadit

337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 jayhadit
Member since 2006 • 337 Posts
[QUOTE="GameArtGuy"]Are people just illiterate... this isnt a WHY THE PS3 is doing bad... its why do you think the ps3 is getting all the hate its getting.... Half of you just joined this and started talking about trolls and blah blah blah..... learn to frickin read kids... its a skill you're going to need later on. Why do you think the PS3 is getting the hate its getting.... those are reasons why HE THINKS its getting the hate... not why he hates it....

I fear you're fishing for albacore in the East River here. Remember it's an gaming website.
Avatar image for jayhadit
jayhadit

337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 jayhadit
Member since 2006 • 337 Posts
nevermind, sounds like everyone agrees with me.
Avatar image for jayhadit
jayhadit

337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 jayhadit
Member since 2006 • 337 Posts
Let me try to say this in the most diplomatic way possible. My point of view is that the 360 is up and running great right now...games look really nice, big library etc. I just feel like it's going to top out a lot sooner than the ps3 will. that thing (once again, my opinion only) will still be on it's way up for at least another 4 years, and MS has planned launching a new console about every three years. So it's a better investment. once again, before anyone gets upset, only my humble opinion. (I'm so dang tired of gettign modded because i disagree with someone)