fanofazrienoch's forum posts

Avatar image for fanofazrienoch
fanofazrienoch

1573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 fanofazrienoch
Member since 2008 • 1573 Posts
I don't think I have any illegal files, but this is a gross violation of the fourth amendment
Avatar image for fanofazrienoch
fanofazrienoch

1573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 fanofazrienoch
Member since 2008 • 1573 Posts

HAHAHAHAHAHA i laugh at all the hardcore people.....the "holy" bible is a book written just like every other book book....the only reason it is special is because the people who wrote it needed something to fall on.....all religion is what makes you comfortable with your life...i am a satanist which is in fact an official religion and we condemo the judeo christian society for being decietful and holding lucifer as responsidble for all problems....now i personally dont care abotu your religion or what makes you happy but being continously bashed in the face with the "perfect" chiristian ideals from the book is absurd...the book is filled with laws that itself breaks...and tells you to refuse your inner beast and hold back the things that makes us man...so i say it deserves a place right next to the book of mormon in my burn barrel outside providing burn material for my fire....

dragonzomb

no such thing as "inner beast" but if there is, and you think we should "let it loose", perhaps you should watch this: http://youtube.com/watch?v=ramBFRt1Uzk

I like living in civilized western society because life in a state of nature is solitary, poor, brutish, and above all short.

Avatar image for fanofazrienoch
fanofazrienoch

1573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 fanofazrienoch
Member since 2008 • 1573 Posts
[QUOTE="Lansdowne5"]

Because the bible was written purely as a historic account not to entertain. Plus it was written by over 60 authors which means that either they were all in on the fictional lie or it is true.

chutup

No. The Bible was never intended by its original authors to be taken literally. It's allegorical, and if Christians had realised that over the centuries, the world would be a hell of a lot better off today.


which begs the question (to chutup) how do you know that's true, that none of the biblical authors wanted their works to be taken as literal fact?
Avatar image for fanofazrienoch
fanofazrienoch

1573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 fanofazrienoch
Member since 2008 • 1573 Posts
I wrote this in a previous topic about this same subject. Sorry about it being a long read btw... but the pictures are pretty :P

______________________________________

The ancient Sumatrans produced multiple pieces of art depicting long-tailed, long-necked creatures with a headcrest. Some of these animals resemble hadrosaurs. This particular work (Ethnographical Museum, Budapest) depicts a creature that bears a striking resemblance to a Corythosaurus which is being hunted by these ancient Indonesian peoples. (Bodrogi, Tibor, Art of Indonesia, plate #10, 1973.)

dino3

______________________________________

dino1dino2

The bronze styling on this artifact suggests it is from the Zhou Dynasty (1122 B.C. - 220 B.C.) or possibly from the Han Dynasty (206 B.C. - 220 A.D.). It displays numerous characteristics of the beaked dinosaurs (like the oviraptor depicted alongside for comparison): tridactyl feet configuration, metatarsal stance, scale-like representation all over the body (except for the horn which has a striated pattern), long (albeit slender) tail, elaborate head crest and a long neck. Another fascinating Chinese artifact is the Late Eastern Zhou Sauropod (Fang Jian) Ornamental box. Displaying a tridactyl foot, a long neck and a head that resembles a brachiosaur, this depiction is compelling. (Fong, Wen ed., The Great Bronze Age of China, Metropolitan Museum of Art, 1980, p. 285.)

dino3

_______________________________________

Here is a Shang dynasty (B.C. 1766-1122) dragon artifact that was advertised on the Chinese antiquities market as a dinosaur depiction. It displays relief lines in a scale-like pattern, a broad beak, a dermal frill, and a headcrest that is strikingly like the dinosaur Saurolophus (shown on the right). This jade statute, now in the Genesis Park collection, is made of white colored nephrite with differential weathering, cleaving veins and earth penetration, demonstrating authenticity.

dino6dino7

__________________________________________

The art below is from an Mesopotamian cylinder seal dated at 3300 BC. (Moortgart, Anton, The Art of Ancient Mesopotamia, 1969, plate 292.) The animal on the right is a modern artist's conception from a skeleton of an Apatosaurus. There are many striking similarities between these two depictions. The legs and feet on the Mesopotamian art clearly fit the saurapods better than any other type of animal. The biggest difference is at the head. Cartilage forming the shape of a frill or ears may be stylized or accurate (since there is no way to know from the skeletons we have today). As for the musculature, the Mesopotamian artist draws with stunning realism. One has to ask where the artist got the model to draw so convincingly the trunk of a saurapod?

dino8

___________________________________________

Below is a Roman mosaic from about 200 AD that depicts two long-necked sea dragons.

dino9dino10

___________________________________________

The picture below was drawn by North American Anasazi Indians that lived in the area that has now become Utah approximately 150 B.C. - 1200 A.D. Even noted anti-creationists agree that it resembles a dinosaur and that the brownish film which has hardened over the picture, along with the pitting and weathering, attests to its age. One evolutionist writes, "There is a petroglyph in Natural Bridges National Monument that bears a startling resemblance to a dinosaur, specifically a Brontosaurus, with a long tail and neck, small head and all." (Barnes and Pendleton, Canyon Country Prehistoric Indians - Their Culture, Ruins, Artifacts and Rock Art, 1995.) Clearly a native warrior and an apatosaur-like creature are depicted. Horned and flying serpent figures are prominent in the mythology of most Native American peoples, often associated with rain and thunder. An example is the Algonquin pictograph of a flying serpent known as Mishipizheu.

dino11dino12

______________________________________

Another petroglyph (carved rock drawing) has been found in Arizona's Havasupai Canyon (photo taken by Dr. DeLancy). In the far right picture, Paul Taylor compares this ancient drawing to the Edmontosaurus.

dino13dino14

__________________________________________

There are stories of a plesiosaur-like creature seen in Queensland, Australia. Both aboriginal peoples around Lake Galilee and tribes farther up to the north tell of a long-necked animal with a large body and flippers. "Elders of the Kuku Yalanji aboriginal tribe of Far North Queensland, Australia, relate stories of Yarru (or Yarrba), a creature which used to inhabit rain forest water holes. The painting below depicts a creature with features remarkably similar to a plesiosaur. It even shows an outline of the gastro-intestinal tract, indicating that these animals had been hunted and butchered." (CEN Technical Journal, Vol.12, No. 3, 1998, p. 345.)

dino14

________________________________________

Deep in the jungles of Cambodia are ornate temples and palaces from the Khmer civilization. One such temple, Ta Prohm abounds with stone statues and reliefs. Almost every square inch of the gray sandstone is covered with ornate, detailed carvings. These depict familiar animals like monkeys, deer, water buffalo, parrots, and lizards. However, one column contains an intricate carving of a stegosaur-like creature. But how could artisans decorating an 800 year old Buddhist temple know what a dinosaur looked like? Western science only began assembling dinosaurs skeletons in the past two centuries.

dino15

____________________________________________

I've got more examples if you'd like but I think that gets my point across. I'm not trying to create a debate but just show evidence that dinosaurs might not have died off millions of years ago as is taught.

mindstorm
how do you find fossils? you dig. are the ancient sumaratons too stupid to dig?
Avatar image for fanofazrienoch
fanofazrienoch

1573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 fanofazrienoch
Member since 2008 • 1573 Posts
[QUOTE="whipassmt"][QUOTE="hokies1313"]

Predator Drones can't shoot down missiles....

A missile shield in the Middle East would be a good idea though. I think it would be nice if the US counter demostrated with a few ICBM test missiles of it's own.

hokies1313

we should test fire one a missile in Iraq by firing it at a Taliban target in Afghanistan (thus having it go right over Iran), i would warn the Iranians about it though, so they don't think it's an attack.

We also don't have any missiles like that in Iraq either.... The US really doesn't need to test fire any medium ranged missiles because we have missiles that can hit anywhere on the planet. Although I wouldn't mind seeing the Pershing Missiles come back into service. That would give Iran something to worry about.

don't we still have those in Europe or were they decomissioned?
Avatar image for fanofazrienoch
fanofazrienoch

1573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 fanofazrienoch
Member since 2008 • 1573 Posts
We should just hope that they wont make a missile that can make it to the US.GrammarKills
there's no way they would. if they did use such a missile by the time such a weapon were deployable, we'd be able to shoot it down with the airborne laser, and Iran's complete destruction would be assured.
Avatar image for fanofazrienoch
fanofazrienoch

1573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 fanofazrienoch
Member since 2008 • 1573 Posts
[QUOTE="fanofazrienoch"][QUOTE="ElectronicMagic"]

You can't prove that Jesus was resurrected, so this discussion you made was pointless from the beginning. If I was given evidence that Jesus existed, I would accept it. But there just isn't any. Since there isn't any proof for or against the existence of Jesus, you have the right to believe he existed and I have the right to disagree.

ElectronicMagic

1: YEs, there IS evidence that Jesus was resurrected, 2nd, what would you consider as evidence that jesus existed?

No, there's isn't proof that Jesus existed or was resurrected. Anything from a unbias third-party. Not people who worshiped said individual or people who came way after said individual was suppose to have existed.

almost NONE of history has this "unbias 3rd party". your methodology is quite frankly completely ****ing insane. you would have us abandon our absolute BEST sources on the life of Jesus JUST because they happen to like him. there is absolutely no historian or scholar of the new testament, atheist or christian, who would EVER in a million years endorse your methods.
Avatar image for fanofazrienoch
fanofazrienoch

1573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 fanofazrienoch
Member since 2008 • 1573 Posts
Hey, I wasn't attacking the bible, just some of the pretend science. I have read the bible actually. The whole organised religion thing just doesn't work for me.
Mr_sprinkles
you don't actually have to be part of an organized religion to be a christian. non-denominational christianity is the fastest growing religion (faster than secular humanism To my knowledge) in America.
Avatar image for fanofazrienoch
fanofazrienoch

1573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 fanofazrienoch
Member since 2008 • 1573 Posts

You can't prove that Jesus was resurrected, so this discussion you made was pointless from the beginning. If I was given evidence that Jesus existed, I would accept it. But there just isn't any. Since there isn't any proof for or against the existence of Jesus, you have the right to believe he existed and I have the right to disagree.

ElectronicMagic
1: YEs, there IS evidence that Jesus was resurrected, 2nd, what would you consider as evidence that jesus existed?
Avatar image for fanofazrienoch
fanofazrienoch

1573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 fanofazrienoch
Member since 2008 • 1573 Posts

Are you saying "prove" isn't a word? ElectronicMagic

no, im saying that "proof" is a concept that does not belong inside science.

That evidence isn't "indisputable". It's only that way because it's something you believe. ElectronicMagic

no, actually its because the evidence strongly indicates that the authors of these books were very close to Jesus during his ministry.

You were the one that started this discussion about whether or not Jesus existed and all you have done is repeated yourself, forcing me to repeat myself. ElectronicMagic

i've started this discussion because its a starting point in "proving" that Jesus was resurrected.

If you believe that, fine. But it doesn't make it in anyway fact.

ElectronicMagic
it (the evidence from the new testament for the existence of Jesus) is taken as fact by nearly all historians and scholars of the new testament.