I would support this only if games took a considerable price drop, say 40 per game, and if they eliminated on disc dlc.

I love dlc that's way big like gear's single player campaign expansions, not with dlc like horse armor, those imo should be unlockables a la ps2/gc/xbox era.

I remember being able to afford 3 great games (grant you, not the newest ones) last gen for $60. Games seem to only grow way more expensive. And if they do also go all digital, steam is a way too awesome model to follow

The problem I see with MS is that its too reliant on franchises like halo and gears, both great games (I actually love gears more), however they cant turn them into a fifa-esque yearly releases. MS you need to innovate and invest in new franchises and genres.

I own all 3 consoles, and I do play my 360 more, tough I feel its just an fps machine, whereas the competition has more genres to offer. Just my opinion, could be wrong.

IMO the ps3 had the advantage, graphic wise on cod: waw, starwars. the soul calibur screens are hard to decide, the 360 version seems lighter whereas the ps3 version seems more detailed