hmmmpppff..... I don't get it... doesn't the whole idea of gaming is to "go forward", innovate and ADD new stuff when a NEW game is out? No offense, but this is the same game but with a 2025 layer on top, yep, spaceships, lots of shinny gadgets full of little lights and hips of explosions that don't really do nothing.
I don't want to get into the "BF3 is this and that and MW3 or CoD is that" but once we have games that you can really alter the environment, blowup building etc, this is like a step back, again with this game series, dont get me wrong, I played CoD, and MW since day 1, and loved it.....big time. But once you have a groundbreaking game out like BF3, witch I never played any of its predecessors, you know that game developers have to rethink how games are done.
When MW and CoD came out, they blow up our minds, because at that time they set the rules of FPS had to be, the sad thing is they didnt move fast enough and relayed on the vapors of eternal fame.... baaaad move.
So, to finish I guess, I see this game not as a failure but as a desperate move to I guess, convince the gamer community that "staying the same" is ok.
both games are awesome, I think the big issue here is that MW3 is more a map pack that a "NEW" game! if we start from there, people will get along! :-)
danielcliment's comments