bizzy420's forum posts

Avatar image for bizzy420
bizzy420

2730

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 bizzy420
Member since 2005 • 2730 Posts
[QUOTE="MortgageMan007"]

[QUOTE="MortgageMan007"]

...No, Anything 720p and higher is considered HD, and anything below is considered sub-HD, hence the "Sub" in sub-HDjustsayin117

It's all how you look at it 480 and below is standard 480 and over is HD

8 years ago before HD becmae mainstream it was basicly said anything over 480 is HD it started out this way now becuase retail needs to sell new models they tell you omg 1080P blah blah blah. When in fact you can not tell the difference between 720p and 1080p on anything 42in and below. even though 720p looks better then 640p 640p is still in some form HD anything over 480 is considered not standard def anymore.

i thought 8 years ago anything over 480p was considered high quality, not high definition. thats why they had EDTVS.
Avatar image for bizzy420
bizzy420

2730

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 bizzy420
Member since 2005 • 2730 Posts
i had a CS (not source) gunmod that looked better than that, and that was like 7 years ago.
Avatar image for bizzy420
bizzy420

2730

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 bizzy420
Member since 2005 • 2730 Posts
ps360 & pc. currently playing nba2k11/halo reach (mostly system link with friends) on 360, UC2(sp)/gow3/sometimes mw2 on my ps3, and still playing fallout3 and civ5 on pc. been thinking about stalker for a looong time, but i hear so many different reviews on it. still undecided. also playing ff2, homerun battle, and modern combat 2 on iphone.
Avatar image for bizzy420
bizzy420

2730

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 bizzy420
Member since 2005 • 2730 Posts

Is this a decent tv for $370? Someone around where i live is selling this tv for that price.

Cloud_7
save up an extra $200 and get something better. westinghouse is crap.
Avatar image for bizzy420
bizzy420

2730

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 bizzy420
Member since 2005 • 2730 Posts
[QUOTE="Hakkai007"]

[QUOTE="bizzy420"][QUOTE="Hakkai007"]

I am sorry but facts are facts and those are direct feed screenshots.

direct feed from what source?

http://www.gamespot.com/pages/forums/show_msgs.php?topic_id=27265046&page=4

.

http://www.systemwars.com/forums/showthread.php?68870-Direct-Feed-PS3-Screenshot-Thread

the screenshots of uc2 look better in the second link. anyways maybe i have to finish reading through all the post, but i still dont see what the source is. what i mean it, is it a youtube video? a compressed video? uncompressed? both the screenshots in this thread (Gears1 and UC2) both look a lot better on my tv, than the screenshots here.
Avatar image for bizzy420
bizzy420

2730

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 bizzy420
Member since 2005 • 2730 Posts
[QUOTE="jdc6305"]

I own a PS3 and resfuse to buy Microsoft. Even if you gave every PS3 exclusive to the 360 I still wouldn't buy. But I have nothing against Bungi or Halo. I feel Halos multiplayer is superior to Killzones. I hope that one day Killzone will catch up so that I can play something as good.

Can Killzones multiplayer ever be as good as Halos?

kz will never be as popular as halo. as far as gameplay, thats all opinion. some like kz more than halo and some like halo more than kz. i dont like kz too much, and i like reach, but in some ways it feels outdated compared to other shooters. not feature wise, but mechanic wise.
Avatar image for bizzy420
bizzy420

2730

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 bizzy420
Member since 2005 • 2730 Posts
[QUOTE="Hakkai007"]

[QUOTE="oldkingallant"][QUOTE="Hakkai007"]

Nope that is how it's like in the game.

There are good areas and bad but I posted alot of pics to show, some are the multiplayer which is worse graphics and some are from single player.

:lol: Yeah... no... it looks much better than that.

I am sorry but facts are facts and those are direct feed screenshots.

direct feed from what source?
Avatar image for bizzy420
bizzy420

2730

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 bizzy420
Member since 2005 • 2730 Posts

[QUOTE="WiiRocks66"][QUOTE="snowren24"]

I got them for $200 on newegg and they are well worth it, $150 would be a steal.

snowren24

Wow, expensive. But it'll be worth it once I'm gaming on the 50" Panasonic Plasma I'm eyeing and having some amazing sound.

I'm on a 50" panny plasma as well. :)

$200 shipped to your front door for 4 quality satellites and a center channel is still a pretty good price. They may have come down a bit since i bought them, but that was the cheapest I could find at the time. I had a Sony HtiB prior that I paid a $350 for, and this system blows it away. The Sony system wasn't worth hooking up, I would argue the TV speakers sounded better.

for take 5 speakers that is a GREAT price. if i see a deal on those speakers i will NOT miss the chance to pick them up.

anyways to TC this is 299.00

http://www.amazon.com/Onkyo-HT-S3300-5-1-Channel-Theater-Receiver/product-reviews/B003BEDQR6/ref=dp_top_cm_cr_acr_txt?ie=UTF8&showViewpoints=1

Avatar image for bizzy420
bizzy420

2730

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 bizzy420
Member since 2005 • 2730 Posts

Xbox Live is honestly a better service then PSN. Yes PSN is free, but thats why some people use matches and others pay for a lighter. When I played COD MW2 on my brothers PSN i was a bit surprised at the way longer wait times and more laggy gameplay on PSN. MS charges for Xbox Live, but some of that money goes to pay for more servers which makes gameplay better online.. I loved the PS2 by the way. Im not a blind kind of fanboy. I think PS2 sort of had the perfect storm.. they launched 1.5 yrs before the underpowered Gamecube and nearly 2yrs before M$'s first console endeavor XB1 ..

Phenom-II
online play is the same dude. its p2p, so it depends on the host. laggy host = laggy game.
Avatar image for bizzy420
bizzy420

2730

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 bizzy420
Member since 2005 • 2730 Posts
[QUOTE="ATLReppa770"][QUOTE="NVIDIATI"]

Image retention still happens and burn in, thats an overly opinionated statement. You've made it obvious you own a "Pioneer Kuro Elite" so thats your experience. (its only the BEST of the BEST) Technically burn in can happen on numerous types of screens including LCDs and CRTs. So saying it doesn't happen is incorrect. On topic CRT>LCD pretty much... LCD just doesn't have the performance. Its tech wasn't built for video media to be honest.YoungSinatra25

No its not incorrect, obviously there are exceptions to the rule, but at this point you would almost have to go out of your way to have burn in occur.

You're an idiot. I just recently purchased a Panasonic P42S2, and it gets burn-in from just sitting in the lobby, waiting for a map to load on Reach. It goes away after about 2 minutes, but to say it no longer exists on plasmas released within the last 3 to 5 years is crazy.

actually thats image retention.