@alenth most of the review is against the tone and design choices of the game then any technical flaws...the sound effects and graphics infact are being appreciated. The reason i feel disappointed after these kinds of reviews is because there was a time when i actually trusted GS more than any site for reviews mostly because they were consistent. As far as being truthful is concerned, i appreciate nothing more than honest truth like jeff gratsmann did with kane and lynch. Kevin on the othre hand is inconsistent not honest. I once again would mention his review of Ninja Blade, which he gave 7.5 and wasnt bothered by enormous QTEs in that game much at all.
@Fishbone_DW @jediknight52501 the reviewer is a professional...his opinion must not be personal, it should be professional, he should take all kinds of interested gamers in consideration while rating a game.its not Kevin's personal blog, we dont come here for his personal opinions
@jediknight52501 @nyran125 tht is my point...nyran hated RE5 but you loved it....Kevin hated RE 5 too and he didnt care about you as a gamer....he gave a personal and emotional review instead of taking those in mind who liked RE 5
@nyran125 'If you were left wanting in RE5 there's a good chance RE6 will satisfy you. There's a reason you're being fired at, there are plenty of tense moments and stress, the storytelling is superb, and "zombies" make a return.' NZgamer
@nyran125 @jediknight52501 the guy who reviewed RE5 5 gave it 8.5. what if, by chance, that guy reviewed RE 6 as well, he wouldve given it a much better rating then. what does this say about the credibility of GS and the worth of its reviews.
azwer's comments