Zack-X-X's forum posts

Avatar image for Zack-X-X
Zack-X-X

61

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#2 Zack-X-X
Member since 2009 • 61 Posts
[QUOTE="Blue_Panda"]

this is actually really funny. i bought COD MW2 today on my 360. i booted it up, went to plug in the ethernet cable, pulled out my chair from behind my desk. "TUUKKHH" the 360 fell over and COD wouldnt work. 15 minutes between purchase and death.

in general i wouldnt buy that though. never buy warranties i always keep my things organized. ive never had problems with my games or consoles this generation. this was the first time ive had a scratched disk or broken anything.

Thats a very rare incident and 360 & PS3 Are different Consoles. Like Srs If I had 360 games I would get warranty for it. PS3 Is betta.
Avatar image for Zack-X-X
Zack-X-X

61

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#3 Zack-X-X
Member since 2009 • 61 Posts
[QUOTE="Denji"]

[QUOTE="Zack-X-X"][QUOTE="Denji"]

It's a simple answer.

It's all to milk the franchise name further.

Want a way to make a few extra mill on Tom Clancy's name? Make military games and slap his name on it.

Want to get that little "extra" with a movie release? Rush a mediocre game with marketing counting on "that impulse buy because you saw the movie". It's a lot easier with kids as well.

It doesn't matter if it's relevant to the story or not. You could have a game about German bears take a crap in a space toilet. But slap "TERMINATOR" as the title and you'll have instant buys on the title alone. Because people see "TERMINATOR".

Manipulation is quite easy...

Yeh thats true, Its about Reputation Like ' Pepsi ' its a brand name. When they drink it they think Of 'pepsi'. I make the mistake of doing that but I no longer do so as I have found Gamespot to get some extra information on what I am purchasing. SR2 was a mistake for me.

I do that every time. Especially with a new franchise. I always look around and research. Not just for the whole "brand name" thing, but also because I don't exactly have money to burn either. So I would rather make what I buy "count". I'd rather spend $60 ~ $70 elsewhere if it's going to be a bad game. Movie games are well known for being horrible since the NES days. So I avoid them like the plague:lol:

Haha, I have the money to burn so it doesnt worry me, I write some reviews for external sites so I buy to write..
Avatar image for Zack-X-X
Zack-X-X

61

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#4 Zack-X-X
Member since 2009 • 61 Posts
Realism is no subtitute for good gameplay or replay value. GTA IV is an overhyped, overrated piece of crap and it's when GTA jumped the shark. The premise of SR 2's design--fun over realism--is superior to that of GTA IV, although it wasn't executed perfectly the way Rockstar did with the PS2 GTA games. So it lacks that polish, but it's still a more fun and entertaining game than GTA IV, even though it may lack depth. BudFudlacker09
Haha No! GTA IV's realistic. SR2 Is unrealistic and just for mucking arround. GTA IV Has good story. And people complain about no one to fight in gangs when you finish. Its because they don't know were to identify the Gangs and there vechiles, I wrote this up in a Review. Read... ------- (Russians) : Broker - Cabaret Club / Diner / Russian Shop / : That is the heartland of there operations fire one bullet there will be 10 or so men on you they have cars in the area some of them have AK-47s. (WARNING!) POLICE STATION IS CLOSE!!! (Blacks) : Alderney Safe House [4 Block Radius] {Identity} - Red Cars (4WD) GOLD WHEELS and Long average red cars. AND Bohan : {Triangle Strip Club} 6 block Radius} fire a bullet they will find you. (Hispanics) : Alderney safe house (Black Cars) - HIghly noticable considering they have so many. ( Cross Road area VIA safehouse is dangerous if the lights are red meaning all 3 gangs including yourself are jamed and you fire a bullet (BAM). ------------- And once you find them, You can have fun with them. If you only concentrate on the 'fun' aspect of things you won't find it.
Avatar image for Zack-X-X
Zack-X-X

61

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#5 Zack-X-X
Member since 2009 • 61 Posts
[QUOTE="Denji"]

It's a simple answer.

It's all to milk the franchise name further.

Want a way to make a few extra mill on Tom Clancy's name? Make military games and slap his name on it.

Want to get that little "extra" with a movie release? Rush a mediocre game with marketing counting on "that impulse buy because you saw the movie". It's a lot easier with kids as well.

It doesn't matter if it's relevant to the story or not. You could have a game about German bears take a crap in a space toilet. But slap "TERMINATOR" as the title and you'll have instant buys on the title alone. Because people see "TERMINATOR".

Manipulation is quite easy...

Yeh thats true, Its about Reputation Like ' Pepsi ' its a brand name. When they drink it they think Of 'pepsi'. I make the mistake of doing that but I no longer do so as I have found Gamespot to get some extra information on what I am purchasing. SR2 was a mistake for me.
Avatar image for Zack-X-X
Zack-X-X

61

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#6 Zack-X-X
Member since 2009 • 61 Posts
I enjoyed both of them... I replayed GTA4 like 3 or 4 times and never replayed SR2, but it was always fun to try to master the planes.MethodManFTW
Yeh GTA IV Didnt have planes like San Andreas. Sucks. I did GTA IV at a friends sleepova finished the game on 360. Overall done it 8x on PS3 and 1x on 360.
Avatar image for Zack-X-X
Zack-X-X

61

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#7 Zack-X-X
Member since 2009 • 61 Posts

i like GTA better. Saints Row is an good but not as good as GTA series

hiphopballer
GTA Series Was good but I'm mainly refering to GTA [IV]
Avatar image for Zack-X-X
Zack-X-X

61

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#8 Zack-X-X
Member since 2009 • 61 Posts
[QUOTE="Scianix-Black"]

[QUOTE="Zack-X-X"][QUOTE="Scianix-Black"]

Just because something is based off another doesn't mean it's going to be the exact same. Rainbow Six is based off the book but that's all it is - they're just using the name. You shouldn't expect all adaptations to be pinpoint accurate, otherwise there would be no point to them.

Mm But I never said pinpoint, Just get the Ideas RIght.

The idea was to take the book's characters and loosely create a video game world around them based on what's written in the book, not translate each and every page into a video game.

Isn't Rainbow Six about a counter terrorist military unit? And aren't the video games based around the same group?

I guess I'm beat. kk
Avatar image for Zack-X-X
Zack-X-X

61

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#9 Zack-X-X
Member since 2009 • 61 Posts

Just because something is based off another doesn't mean it's going to be the exact same. Rainbow Six is based off the book but that's all it is - they're just using the name. You shouldn't expect all adaptations to be pinpoint accurate, otherwise there would be no point to them.

Scianix-Black
Mm But I never said pinpoint, Just get the Ideas RIght.
Avatar image for Zack-X-X
Zack-X-X

61

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#10 Zack-X-X
Member since 2009 • 61 Posts
[QUOTE="jeremiah06"][QUOTE="Zack-X-X"]

Ahh, Good old movies.. Well I have observed some things so let me enlighten you, I have baught Tom Clancys, Rainbow 6. Book & Game. As interesting as the book was, the game was suppose to be based on the book. So why was it completely different? Why do they have the same name without much relevance to each other.

Also, The Godfather II never even went to Cuba in the real movie. But in the game high ranking GF Family members get killed. Then, you are the Don called dominic of whom I HAVE never hered of in the movie. You collect racket debts of which a Don would never do in the movie. his soldiers would. I am yet to play the Bourne Ultimatum but I hope thats not the same.

So my question is, Do you think that Movies or books made into games are totally different in most cases?

Thanks

Zxx

I think a book would be better as a game than a movie because most movies are from books and they have to rush through the story else the movie would be 10-12 hours long but a game CAN and should be long like that so a book to game would be great IMO

Well It didnt Seem to work in this case did it?