@SingletreeAve: Right? That's why my new video card was $800. Unfortunately, that has left me without the money to buy Civ.

This seems like a PR oversight. Like they meant to reveal it at a certain time, but forgot that they had already cleared Nintendo to reveal it at an earlier date. Are they even aware of the trailer? The spokesperson didn't deny Skyrim; he only declined to confirm anything.

@eyebro: I see that you didn't bother to watch the video.

Only 12 GB? Naw, it'll swell up with mods. That's an unrealistically-low number.

A fourth-generation i5 at 2.5 GHz? I wonder what's special about the fourth generation. I expect that my third-generation i5 (at 4.6 GHz) will work fine.

@reavern: Perhaps his intended meaning was the less-trivial "easy for Ubisoft to use," as in "easy to develop for."

This doesn't look any better than I remember. At least the Skyrim remaster had some neat new shaders.

@mordeaniis: "Do not trespass while playing Pokemon GO." - the game itself, every single login. I would argue that players are actually discouraged from entering private property, because the game literally tells them not to. The disclaimer is given because Niantic cannot know the positions of all of the things in the game - how could they? I don't know of any game with a greater physical scale; reviewing all the land and cross-referencing with all the world's municipal records would be an impossibly daunting task, so a simple disclaimer is used instead.
In the end, this is a question of personal responsibility; Niantic is not my parent, and I am not bound to perform any action that their program's RNG might mildly suggest (because let's face it: the game has no win condition, so there is no strong encouragement; only mild).

@DEATHWlSH: Their victory, it seems to me, would set a very bad precedent. Holding product makers responsible for the actions of their users would discourage the making of new products and could result in many existing ones being discontinued.

@Bansheezs: There should be a ban on bans.