Jeff got some swag from Capcom, and posted this on GiantBomb.
ViewtifulScott's forum posts
They should really stop dragging it out.SSF4 roster to be revealed between Feb 18th - March 11th
Metamania
[QUOTE="King9999"][QUOTE="dakan45"]Reviews are done in a way to make th game sell, usually filled with lies and hype and skiping the bad parts altougether!yanbuco2712
Reviewers aren't salesmen.
he's right about the hype part though, which explains GTAIV's score Or the reviewers just liked the game more than you. I mean, it's a possibility that should be considered in an effort to be, ya know, reasonable.Ahh, okay, let me clarify. Whatever we're agreeing or disagreeing on, what I'm trying to say is that the reviews questioning the GS score were not made hours after the game's release. Some of them were, but not all.alert0It's not gamespot's fault those people are narrow minded enough to not be able to understand that not everyone will have the same opinions about a game. One man's trash, is another man's treasure. That old saying rings true to this day, sadly, some people just DON'T GET IT. They think their has to be one universal final word verdict on everything. Which is of course, naive and childish. But most people online are naive and childish, so it fits.
Then again, GS said Dante's Inferno was great fun and gave it a 6.5... I don't know what to make of the score anymore.alert06.5 means "fair". Not "flop lmao".
I can disagree with this specifically wrt ME2. All the reviews that came out within hours of the game being released were 9.5s or 10s. The 8s and 7.5s only started to creep in after a couple of days, when people had fully explored the universe. I'm not saying the 10s didn't keep coming in, but no-one was disappointed enough at the outset to give it a low score. So no, that sentiment is not valid here.
alert0
Yes, that sentiment is valid, your own post proved it beyond any reasonable doubt. Reviews coming in within an hour of most people playing the game lavishing it with praise are complete and utter BS. The more reasonable, maybe even outright low scores come in later, from people who played the game to completion first. The reviews came down with time for ME2 because the fanboys finally got it out of their system. The exact same thing will happen with Dante's Inferno. You actually validated my point while trying to disprove it.
Thank you. :)
The only difference between the ME2 fanboys and the DI fanboys is that the ME2 fanboys aren't prefacing their review with some flaccid shot at Gamespot's cred, but if ME2 scored lower, they would, like the DI fanboys are.
Log in to comment