ViewtifulScott's forum posts

Avatar image for ViewtifulScott
ViewtifulScott

878

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

5

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 ViewtifulScott
Member since 2005 • 878 Posts

Jeff got some swag from Capcom, and posted this on GiantBomb.

Avatar image for ViewtifulScott
ViewtifulScott

878

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

5

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 ViewtifulScott
Member since 2005 • 878 Posts

SSF4 roster to be revealed between Feb 18th - March 11th

Metamania
They should really stop dragging it out.
Avatar image for ViewtifulScott
ViewtifulScott

878

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

5

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 ViewtifulScott
Member since 2005 • 878 Posts
His hypocritical rant where he gave Robert Gates and Mike Mullen hell for wanting to do away with "don't ask, don't tell", when he is on record during the campaign saying he would defer to military leadership on that and would support abolishing it if they did, pretty much made him a complete bloody joke.
Avatar image for ViewtifulScott
ViewtifulScott

878

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

5

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 ViewtifulScott
Member since 2005 • 878 Posts
I actually thought that article was completely mediocre.
Avatar image for ViewtifulScott
ViewtifulScott

878

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

5

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 ViewtifulScott
Member since 2005 • 878 Posts
In the time Jeff Gerstmann was here, (someone obviously overweight) he was noted by his coworkers as a "DDR machine". He reviewed some of those games, and was as partial as anyone.
Avatar image for ViewtifulScott
ViewtifulScott

878

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

5

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 ViewtifulScott
Member since 2005 • 878 Posts
[QUOTE="King9999"]

[QUOTE="dakan45"]Reviews are done in a way to make th game sell, usually filled with lies and hype and skiping the bad parts altougether!yanbuco2712

Reviewers aren't salesmen.

he's right about the hype part though, which explains GTAIV's score

Or the reviewers just liked the game more than you. I mean, it's a possibility that should be considered in an effort to be, ya know, reasonable.
Avatar image for ViewtifulScott
ViewtifulScott

878

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

5

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 ViewtifulScott
Member since 2005 • 878 Posts

Ahh, okay, let me clarify. Whatever we're agreeing or disagreeing on, what I'm trying to say is that the reviews questioning the GS score were not made hours after the game's release. Some of them were, but not all.alert0
It's not gamespot's fault those people are narrow minded enough to not be able to understand that not everyone will have the same opinions about a game. One man's trash, is another man's treasure. That old saying rings true to this day, sadly, some people just DON'T GET IT. They think their has to be one universal final word verdict on everything. Which is of course, naive and childish. But most people online are naive and childish, so it fits.

Avatar image for ViewtifulScott
ViewtifulScott

878

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

5

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 ViewtifulScott
Member since 2005 • 878 Posts
Then again, GS said Dante's Inferno was great fun and gave it a 6.5... I don't know what to make of the score anymore.alert0
6.5 means "fair". Not "flop lmao".
Avatar image for ViewtifulScott
ViewtifulScott

878

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

5

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 ViewtifulScott
Member since 2005 • 878 Posts

You cant screw up an opinion.

rzepak
IMO, the sky is purple.
Avatar image for ViewtifulScott
ViewtifulScott

878

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

5

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 ViewtifulScott
Member since 2005 • 878 Posts

I can disagree with this specifically wrt ME2. All the reviews that came out within hours of the game being released were 9.5s or 10s. The 8s and 7.5s only started to creep in after a couple of days, when people had fully explored the universe. I'm not saying the 10s didn't keep coming in, but no-one was disappointed enough at the outset to give it a low score. So no, that sentiment is not valid here.

alert0

Yes, that sentiment is valid, your own post proved it beyond any reasonable doubt. Reviews coming in within an hour of most people playing the game lavishing it with praise are complete and utter BS. The more reasonable, maybe even outright low scores come in later, from people who played the game to completion first. The reviews came down with time for ME2 because the fanboys finally got it out of their system. The exact same thing will happen with Dante's Inferno. You actually validated my point while trying to disprove it.

Thank you. :)

The only difference between the ME2 fanboys and the DI fanboys is that the ME2 fanboys aren't prefacing their review with some flaccid shot at Gamespot's cred, but if ME2 scored lower, they would, like the DI fanboys are.