I've played the first Borderlands this September when it was free on PS Plus, and I enjoyed it. Most people who were playing online at the time were at much higher levels than me, so I mostly played alone and it was still fun to me. I've heard a lot of people say it's only fun when you're playing co-op but I didn't mind too much. Getting new loot was addicting, and the guns were pretty fun to use. The story was pretty uninspired but I heard Borderlands 2 fixes this and adds more loot. Another complaint I had about Borderlands 1 was that there were too little enemy types, especially in the beginning (fighting skags got tedious very quickly). Does the second game have a lot more variety in terms of enemies?
As for Far Cry 3, I've never played a previous Far Cry game. I've watched some videos and I'm on the fence. On one hand, the weapons and shooting look pretty generic. There's nothing that looks new or stands out to me. Despite this, I've still heard good things about the gameplay. On the other hand, the story and characters seem pretty cool and the world looks pretty expansive. I know the Borderlands games are also open-world but are split up into different zones.Both games got good reviews, so could you guys help me decide which one to get?
I like large open worlds with stuff to do outside of the main quest, and I'm an RPG fan so I like customization. I also believe in fun over realism. Hopefully this is enough to help you guys help me. Thanks.
Log in to comment