Most likely......but who knows.

Personally didn't like the Fallout 3. The gunplay and the way you had to walk around the entire world got boring. Wish the gameplay was more like Borderlands. I love the way Fallout did the expierence though and the VATS was pretty cool

Sucked at the first one. I'll have to pass even though I know it will be Great.

Buy a headset

Ok...... I know this is a new game but it will most likely be just like Fallout 3, just withanother story line. I personally didn't like Fallout 3's Gunplay or way of traveling around. I know a lot of people love Fallout 3 but it was boring to me. I think Borderlands took what was a great idea and made it better. The Gunplay in Borderlands is fun plus it was Co-op. Now a Thumb up to Fallout for the RPG Elements, the VATS was cool and theway theexpierence worked was cool.

I Guess my question is would you prefer the same gunplay from the Fallout 3 game or something similar to Borderlands?

*I respect everyone reason for liking Fallout 3 but I am just wondering if I was the only that thought the Gunplay sucked.

I might check it out.

Owning 4 higher rated guys in socom. It was round 7 my whole team was dead and it was 4 left on the other team. They planted the bomb and I came in behind them and defused and we Won. It was funny.

Fun to get.... adds Replay value. And I like to brag about some of the trophies.

Haven't played it yet but The ones on the first two game are hard. I'm kind of glad it's a little easier.

I love the Splinter Cell series but the IGN review says it's only 5 hours single player. Yea, I know there is a fairly lengthy co-op campaign - 4hours, but after how long that game has been in development, that is just unacceptable for a mainly single player game. It should at least be 8, preferably 10 hours.

Sorry about the little rant - back on topic - no I do not think it is coming to PS3, but maybe. I guess we'll see.

xboxfreak1

Agreed I saw that review and only 5hours just isn't cutting it.