I assume they’ve found a way to make tabletop games online only and have micro transactions.

“Monopolies are good, especially when you’re heavily invested in the monopoly.”

Less options and less competition is NEVER a good thing for consumers, but this is exactly what I’d expect a rich CEO who stands to gain from removing competitors to say.

The greed in this industry is out of control.

I thought D4 was too “serious” and the world too “gritty” and “mature” for a secret cow level. Oh right, Blizzard are pathological liars.

That’s leaving a lot of money on the table. You realize the PlayStation install base is twice the size of Xbox, right Microsoft?

If they care about money (they do) then ES6 will eventually come to all platforms, including PS5 and Switch 2 or whatever it ends up being called.

Good luck enforcing any of that.

Giving a game a 10/10 is honestly more of a curse than a blessing at this point.

The way humans work, it’s going to garner far more negativity than positivity.

Probably should have just left it a 9, and nobody would’ve given it a second glance.

@lonewolf1044:

I agree, but just because they have the money doesn’t mean they can just buy whoever they want.

Microsoft infamously tried to buy Nintendo a while ago and they just laughed in their faces.

Glad I don’t play any of that garbage.

$40 for this is ridiculous. Of course the review doesn’t mention the price, since they get everything for free here.

There’s no way I’m paying $40. This is a single A game with a double A price.

At least it’s on PC too, where everything is free if you look hard enough. 🙃

"Online matches are effected by the same latency problems that have plagued the series for years. "

Wrong word usage there. It should be "affected" with an A. Very common mistake, almost as common as "your" and "you're." Or "then" and "than."