Interesting; I used to get angry when reading about the activities of Fox towards electronic-games, yet now - I just roll my eyes. I find it strange that they fail to notice how few ladies are the bad guys in games in comparison to guys. If the amounts were switched...then suddenly oh my god! It's sexist!

I think that 3D has a place and a time in electronic-gaming; for certain titles. But as a gereral direction for gaming's future? No way, in that sense I agree with Emil. If game-devs focuse too much on that, they will start to lose a sense gameplay-direction; and some may believe that it's they can get away with bad gameplay [lack of innovation] by just having fancy graphics. Graphics aren't everything, but they do have a big place in the industry. [Just remember that Emil was also the guy who talked about killing old people so vibrantly on the Fallout 3 bad karma documentary].

Some days I play games for 4 hours - sometimes when a new one like Halo 3 came out, I'll play for 8 just to finish it. But normally? Some days I don't play electronic-games at all... People blame gaming for wayyyyyyy to much. Just like they did with comics in the 1950's...I mean as soon as there's a shooting SUDDENLY: OMG, ban gaming ban gaming ba- There have always been shootings, and crime etc. In fact, as games have gotten bigger - shooting have lessened in percentage apparently. That statement about heroin - NOT true. If you go up to someone and they say: I play electronic-games sometimes - you'll most likely reply: "oh cool, what kinds do you play" - if they say: I do heroin sometimes - you'll go: "You should get some help before it gets bad - that stuff is not good for you. In other words doing a lot of heroin is not like playing a lot of games. Just saying.

I am not seeing any difference other than higher contrast on one, and less on the other - it's not really fair because it isn't really different at all without this change of monitor setting.