[QUOTE="AcidTWister"]I dunno. How are you enjoying your graphically inferior, longer loading time version? Each version has its merits. Thanks for bringing up an old and beaten-to-death argument. Dismissed. Pardon? What are you talking about? Read the review here on GameSpot. The PS3 version has better graphics, as well as better framerates, and faster load times. But wait : I'll save you the typical response : "Well, they had an extra year to work on it! Of course the PS3 version will be better!" I know that... A year work for a marginal improvement, and the console only costs $200 more, with me having already beaten its only AAA game a year ago on a cheaper console.. But what I was asking about was the "beaten to death argument"? What is it? Marginal improvement? Have you PLAYED the PS3 game? There's a video version of Oblivion 360 vs PS3 running around the internet right now, you should check it out. They show the 360 version hitting a load time, while the PS3 runs across the same area, and never stops. It's not really "smaller" load times. Try fewer, and almost nonexistent.[QUOTE="AfterShafter"][QUOTE="flazzle"][QUOTE="AfterShafter"][QUOTE="asmallchild"][QUOTE="AfterShafter"]... how are all of you PS3 Oblivion owners enjoying Shivering Isles?AfterShafter
For example:
http://www.gametrailers.com/player.php?id=18084&type=wmv&pl=game
Good comparison between 360's load times vs. PS3's. "But... but.. teh blu ray's slower read times!"
Oh WOW - that's a huge improvement for only a year development time and a $200 more expensive system! Though, I wonder why I can't even remember seeing those stutters in the 360 version... Yes and Ps3 is more powerfull :roll: if ps3 is even more powerfull than today pcs and xbox360, why the game doesnt look like CGI quality ? it got a year of development time. c'mon its the Cell and RSX :roll:
Log in to comment