Guys, you can bash the reviewer for their opinion of the gameplay, but you can't criticize them for deducting points for the numerous bugs it has. This game was delayed three times, and it's still full of bugs & crashes. That's not acceptable for a AAA company.
CDPR should've delayed the game until it was fully stable. They rushed it just to make sales during the holiday season.
@dinamo4ever: I'm criticizing it based on the review I've read. You're defending it just because you expect it to be good based on the hype. That's the difference...
@Gaming-Planet: Based on the gameplay footage I've seen of this game, it seems very liberal. So a liberal site like Gamespot should've given it a 9 or a 10 based on that.
Still, I'm not gonna bash the game too much until I've played it for myself. Even at it's worse, it should be a above-average game.
HAHAHAHAHA! I had an inkling this game is gonna be a major buzzkill, and I was right. Games that get overhyped have a tendency to disappoint in the end.
I'm still gonna play it though. Not much else to play this December.
Oh, and i bet the fanboys are already defending this game as if they've played it already. Fanboys are the worst kind of gamers.
I think Ubisoft should've just made a new A-RPG series with games like Odyssey & Valhalla.
These games have very little to do with Assassin's Creed, and their traditional Action-Adventure gameplay with a heavy emphasis on stealth & spying. They could've taken a year or two to figure out how they want to proceed the Assassin's Creed series without killing it's gameplay structure.
If they have brains, they will make it like the original trilogy & not at all like the trash known as Andromeda. I'm fine with new characters & all, as long as they're not cringeworthy.
PurpleWarden's comments