Alot of people here still use their PS2's, i still ocassionaly hear kids say "Wanna play San Andreas on my PS2 ?" or "Wanna play Pro Evolution Soccer 4 ?" it's amazing how popular the Playstation 2 still is to this day.

And i still didn't buy it, i tried the free trial which lasts for like 2 hours and i didn't find it all that special, it's most likely fun with friends but i can't see myself forking over 20 euros for Minecraft, maybe if it was 10 or 5 I'd consider picking it up, mainly because i got alot of friends who play it

I don't like Ubisoft all that much but I'd rather have them own THQ's IPs instead of EA and Activision.

@CaesarIIII @Sefrix Saints Row is better then GTA and Stalker is better than Fallout. THQ release amazing games and doesn't treat it's customers like shit. It's sad to see comapnies like THQ go down while anti-consumer companies like EA and Activision rise

Game looks like alot of fun, graphicly it's fine for me. As long as the game is a blast the graphics won't matter much.

@damnstraight003 I actully didn't touch the PVP at all in GW2 and i got over 100 hours in it, i'm simply not inreasted in PVP in MMORPGs. I only like PVE and GW2 did a great job with it. I always found competetive play in MMORPGs to be silly. I just play em to do fun quests and do dungeons with friends or strangers

It deserves the award imo, iv'e played the game for 110-120 hours and had a blast with it and theres still alot of stuff i didn't do in the game.

Most likely a marketing gimick, i seriously doubt you'll need a 1 GB GPU to run Crysis 3 on low settings, only if the game is extreamly poorly optimized which might happen since Crytek doesn't really care about PC gamers anymore sadly. Anyway, yeah it's a marketing gimick to make people buy more expensive hardware, same thing hapend when BF3 was coming out. Many people thought you'd need a nuclear powered PC to run the game on medium or high setings, yet you can run the game on Medium-High setings just with a normal mid range PC and get 30-60 FPS.

@Prometheus Not really, it's pretty simple. Set the game 100(or more) years after Mass Effect 3's Ending and don't show any of the original characters, this way they can create a new original story with ouz going into the past orrrr they could set it only a few years after the Ending and allow people to port over their save files from ME3.

Oh boy, another Battlefield fanboy who thinks BF is a realistick military simulator and thinks the BF franchise is the most innovative shooter ever. The same level of stupidity you get from COD fanboys. Both BF and COD haven't done anything drastickly new gameplay wise for years now, any person with half of a brain knows that, only idiotic fanboys like you keep calling these games "innovative" and "best gamez evar" . I don't hate COD or BF i even play them occassionaly, i mainly hate these stupid fanboys who only play Call Of Duty or Battlefield while theres a metric ton of better,more fun and balanced shooters on the market which actully try new things.