Not gonna lie, this has got me excited to dust off my copy of ME3 next week. Very Lovecraftian. Well, the whole series employs Cosmicism for the inspiration of the reapers, but this is what I wanted to know playing through the series. Where the ess did the reapers originate?
Are they really trying to legitimize this series? It's always been about boobs. Yet not a single jiggle in the entire video. At least Itagaki knew what his "fans" wanted.
These guys were under the EA umbrella, had a tie-in with Mass Effect 3 and put together a promising first effort under a tight schedule. This is uncalled for. If budding developers are going through so much trouble, it's going to lead to strains in innovation from anyone trying to accomplish something new and exciting. A talented team who built a fun and sprawling game like this should be commended for their efforts, not shat on.
I may, MAY be more excited for this than any other game this year. I spent the better part of 1996 trudging through the Playstation version. Loading and framerate issues aside, one of best gaming experiences I've ever had.
Anyone who wants a happy ending missed the whole point of the series, apparently. Do you know how cheated I would feel to play through this entire game and fight these "unbeatable" foes only to have an ending where everyone lives and things go back to normal like nothing ever happened. "And they lived happily ever after" is a cop out ending that too many American audiences have gotten used to because they can't accept the fact that life doesn't always go the way you want it. I was wholly satisfied with the ending and if Shepard came out alive in my playthrough, I would have felt cheated. I guess there aren't a lot of Dark Tower fans who played this game. I just...this whole petition to change the ending is the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard. The entire plot of the game is about living with the choices you make, regardless of the outcome, Bioware made a choice, live with it.
What the hell are you trolls talking about, the ending was great, the game was great, beat it and move on with your life. Jesus, what a bunch of fu**ing babies.
Mobile gaming is great for wasting time and that's about it. Personally, I don't get the whole Angry Birds fascination. It's a watered down version of Worms, but the 100 million people who downloaded it probably don't know that. Is it better for gaming? I think it makes little difference. These simple touch-screen games are gaining market share, sure, but when you compare the experience you get from an Infinity Blade with a Dragon Quest it's apples and oranges. I've never been immersed in a mobile game, unless, of course it's a port of a console or DS game (Civ Revolution has taken a few days of my life and rightfully so), but the experience has many caveats. Unless you put your phone in airplane mode, there are constant interruptions from texts, calls and emails. And as a hardcore gamer for my entire memorable life, mobile gaming is fun for a few minutes, but it's not for me. We all have our preferences as gamers -- the same is true for developers. As long as there are talented game-makers yearning to create something amazing, I think there will still be this separation. And that's a good thing for all of us.
LeviHarris' comments