[QUOTE="dave123321"][QUOTE="SmileyJetsonxD"] Don't worry, I'll use your summary as the basis for my paper.SmileyJetsonxD

If you've written 3.5 pages on the rubbish that was written in this thread you deserve nothing more than an F and consequential expulsion.

Comic Sans is an awful, awful font.

I played through it and have now forgotten the ending (I do remember being pretty disappointed thought). Shapeshifting was an intriguing mechanic for a few hours but the story was very passable. I know that a sequel is in order though, so that should tie up any loose ends.

Have you got all the landmark orbs/hints?

King Henry VIII famously (this is factual stuff!) exploded in his coffin after years of gluttonously eating. All the fat and gasses built up inside him and a few days before his interment he blew up inside his coffin. Zombies are all based off of very deep scientific studies, you see?

You also have to have variation. Scrawny midget zombies are still zombies but it would get awfully repetitive shooting those over and over again—fat zombies liven things up.

Gah, I got to 1,020,000. I had 99% coverage and was scrambling for 100%, but screwed up. Is it worth going for the coverage, are the bonuses substantial?

I'm loving the game, by the way. Much better than Lumines. I unlocked all the levels and the music is fantastic. The level with the objective is maybe the best of the lot.

UpInFlames

Don't worry, my first score was 500, 000, second 900, 000 and scraped past the achievement without about 1, 190, 000 on the third. I passed with about 70% coverage (I'm truly awful at matching up geometry; I was bad at Tetris, I'm bad at Chime). Coverage helps at last second moments, for every ten percent extra coverage it awards you with an extra thirty seconds of time, so use it when your starting to get pretty close to the finish. Otherwise concentrate solely on getting lots of large quads. It's more of a balancing act than one facet is either substantial or futile.

And the song (For Silence) got quite a bit of stick for people who found the game a rip off because it was apparently the only good song in the game (I keep listening to it!). "Oh Yeah" was awful, but there's definitely a nice song choice here. :)

It was cancelled because of lack of funding from what I remember (or some money related issue) but I did not pay attention to that game.

how can some terrorist steal a plane with high security

where can you find a pilot terrorist

do you think one hit can effect on one of the best buildings in us

how come the building didn't hit the buildings beside it

what about the other building being exactly the same without hitting the others

---

many people say they heard eplosions in the building

many many other questions .....

so it have to be an inside job (a perfect job)

Shaggy_online

The airport security boom was created by 9/11. That is not to say that there was no security but you were certainly not walking through scanners and metal detectors every second you turned. It would be easier to hijack an aeroplane back then. Additionally, once on the aeroplane there is absolutely no security to stop you. Where do you find anyone willing to vote for a plot like this? Finding a pilot happy to crash into a building is by far one of the easier tasks when doing something like this.

Structurally the building wasn't state of the art. The integral infrastructure was the only thing stopping the building from toppling. This network of metal poles holding the entire skyscraper together answers all the questions. The heat of jet fuel will not completely destroy the metal but it will make the entire structure bend. Once the metal has bent too much the building will collapse. The reason it didn't fall onto the others is because the infrastructure collapsed downwards with the weight, so rather than the whole thing falling to one side the top floors collapsed into the rest of the building.

Of course you're going to here explosions inside a building. There's hundreds of people, extremely bright and hot fires, collapsing metal, exploding electronics, facilities getting utterly obliterated. When an aeroplane crashes into a skyscraper it is not going to be quiet: there will be a hell of a lot of explosions.

I'm 13, I get home from school, start up the computer and then stay on it until I'm feeling the need or told to get some sleep. My parents do not disapprove per se, they certainly wish I had more interactions with my family and friends but I've had a passion for gaming for years now and they are also cognizant of how much more fun I find playing video games over recreational activities outside. If you have a passion for gaming and you're planning to take your career in that direction, you've got a perfect lineup and they really shouldn't be complaining about your decisions.

I'd say 91 subjects is quite a small number of people to make any correlation between physical proportions and brain size. It may be true but it could simply be coincidental. For a scientific experiment less than one hundred people is inadequate.

EDIT: By the way, the frontal lobe is just part of the cerebral cortex, it affects decision making and how you react in certain circumstances. That does not make you stupid. It doesn't necessarily or directly control impulsiveness either but it makes you shortsighted to the consequences of actions (i.e, you don't recognise eating a lot will make you fatter and thus you continue).

[QUOTE="Kervik"]

Looking at who benefits from an instant does not instantly lead you to the person who the finger should be pointed at. It's fully possible that the Bush administration and American government set up some elaborate plan to destroy the World Trade Centre, but it would be bafflingly complex, the chances of keeping it a secret tiny. So many people would have to be part of such a scheme: the military, government officials, the emergency services, the hundreds of workers employed there, the employers and management, security guards and the families of those whom were about to be victimised. You can't compensate for a life: eventually an intimate relative of one of those killed would open their mouth and denounce the government and publicly release the information on that day.

What Truthers want is absolute access. Government files, military documents - everything - to be available to them and that is simply illogical; it will never happen. I am still ambivalent in regards to who is to blame for 9/11, I do not blame you for being in two minds, but the chances of it being the government and it still being strictly confidential and unconfirmed to this day? Very unlikely.

[QUOTE="Mr_Anderson1817"]

Bush gained from it, it set up his whole War on Terror, which is just a war to make money. Like what Lenin said, look for the one who benefits and you'll find the guilty. But just because there's an association of Bush benefiting from 9/11, doesn't mean there's a correlation. (not sure i'm using the right words here, w/e)

I've done some "research" on the JFK assassination and I don't think it was a conspiracy. There were some fishy things going on, but the actual killing was pretty straightforward, 1 guy 1 gun 3 shots (something like that)

BMD004

2 bullets. One bounced and hit both Kennedy and the man sitting in the passenger's seat (look up the Magic Bullet Theory) and then a second from the infamous Grassy Knoll that hit JFK in the head and killed him.

The first shot penetrates his lung which is why he grips hit chest. The moving back and forward is probably him writhing trying to get some air into his lungs. If the bullet hit him from behind fragments of his brain wouldn't have ended up on the boot, they would have been inside the car. His wife famously pleaded for the car to stop and she then got out to collect the brains off of the back of the car. I only researched JFK briefly so I don't have many facts to back it up with but it wouldn't make sense if the fatal shot game from behind.