@majesticmc ''even at 60fps (which doesn't matter because the human eye can only see 27 fps''This is not true, it's a misconception. Yes, the eye can only see 27 fps but that definitely doesn't mean that there is no difference between 27 fps and 60. Lets say you're playing a game at 60 fps, every frame that your eye will see will be a combination of 2.22 (60/27) frames. This makes the action look a lot more smoother.To better understand the combination of frames, look at this picture: http://www.rickbucich.com/wp-content/original/2012_02/Adidas-Youth-Soccer-Blur.jpg. You see, the camera captured a combination of the kid being at more than one place at the same time.Anyways, I hope you understand now. If not, try running a game at 27 fps and then at 60 fps on your computer and tell me if you see a difference (hint: you will).
Why not just get rid of the scores? The goods and bads that GS put at the beginning of each review is usually a better indicative of the quality of the game than the scores.
Sorry but I don't give a crap about a trailer that doesn't show in-game graphic... which is why the MW2 trailer was crap and that this one is better no matter how cheesier you want to make it sound.
Joe295159's comments