Inferman's forum posts

Avatar image for Inferman
Inferman

140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Inferman
Member since 2007 • 140 Posts
Loading Video...

Progressives seem to be anti free speech.

Anti freedom of religion.

And they seem to care more about the color of people's skin rather than their actions.

Avatar image for Inferman
Inferman

140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Inferman
Member since 2007 • 140 Posts

@R3FURBISHED:

Loading Video...

Avatar image for Inferman
Inferman

140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Inferman
Member since 2007 • 140 Posts

@R3FURBISHED:

What about...

Between the years 1980-2003, 93% of the perpetrators of black homicide were.... *drum roll*.... other blacks.

https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/htus8008.pdf

I'm confused. You don't think black on black crime is more prevalent than white on black crime? Seriously? I thought it was common knowledge that black on black crime (and black on white crime) was much more prevalent than white on black crime? No matter. I cited a source that proves it. There are many others.

Avatar image for Inferman
Inferman

140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Inferman
Member since 2007 • 140 Posts

@Serraph105 said:

@Inferman: Way to copy/paste your last post and ignore my point.

Does anyone know if that counts as spam?

Because you're not making any point.

Geographically, the United States is finite.

The resources of the United States are also finite.

The United States has poor, diseased, and uneducated.

However, despite the aforementioned, you think the United States should grant citizenship to millions of illegals, and make it easier for more immigrants to flood into the country.

How about we get rid of the poor, diseased, and uneducated US CITIZENS before we start working on other people? Kthx

Avatar image for Inferman
Inferman

140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5  Edited By Inferman
Member since 2007 • 140 Posts

Between the years 1980-2003, 93% of the perpetrators of black homicide were.... *drum roll*.... other blacks.

https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/htus8008.pdf

Avatar image for Inferman
Inferman

140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Inferman
Member since 2007 • 140 Posts

@MonsieurX said:

You're not going to last long with your threads

Why are the mods part of the Regressive Left?

Avatar image for Inferman
Inferman

140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Inferman
Member since 2007 • 140 Posts

@perfect_blue said:

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2015/nov/23/donald-trump/trump-tweet-blacks-white-homicide-victims/

???

These statistics are from the crime statistics bureau in san fran. What's with the fake news and alternate fact?

Avatar image for Inferman
Inferman

140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8  Edited By Inferman
Member since 2007 • 140 Posts

"Since 9/11, 72 individuals from the seven mostly Muslim countries covered by President Trump's "extreme vetting" executive order have been convicted of terrorism, bolstering the administration's immigration ban."

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/report-72-terrorists-came-from-7-muslim-countries-trump-targeted/article/2614582

The Regressive Left likes putting US citizens in danger.

Avatar image for Inferman
Inferman

140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Inferman
Member since 2007 • 140 Posts

@Serraph105 said:

@Inferman: We're hurting ourselves by having a system that doesn't actually work. If people come in illegally we can't collect as much in taxes from them, and we provide them various services. This is not an argument that says let's take care of everyone, this is an argument that says we are not taking care of ourselves. Depending on the country you live in the only reasonable option they have to immigrate here is by doing so illegally, and if they do that they will get taken care of here without fully contributing to the systems that they are allowed to take advantage of.

Illegal immigrants are not US citizens.

We should take care of those poor and uneducated US citizens before we start taking care of the world's poor and uneducated.

I don't care if it's difficult to get into the United States; that difficulty is on the shoulders of non-US citizens. My main concern are US citizens.

Geographically, the United States is finite.

The resources of the United States is finite.

We have poor and uneducated US citizens.

The United States can only fit and tend to so many people.

Avatar image for Inferman
Inferman

140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10  Edited By Inferman
Member since 2007 • 140 Posts

@n64dd said:
@Inferman said:
@n64dd said:
@Inferman said:

Which premise do you reject then?

1. if a person is not inclined to break the law, then they're less likely to break the law.

2. An illegal immigrant is a person.

3. An illegal immigrant has broken the law.

Therefore,

4. It is more likely than not that an illegal immigrant is a person who is inclined to break the law.

Therefore,

5. There are more illegal immigrants who are people who are inclined to break laws than there are illegal immigrants who are people who are not inclined to break laws.

---

And if the conclusions (4) and (5) are untrue, then why does the following statistic exist: 75% of federal drug crimes were commited by illegals in 2014. And why is 1/4 of prisoners non US citizens? Isn't that strange? 90% or more of the US population are US citizens. Finally, if illegals are not inclined to crime, then why is Vanessa Pham dead?

I give it a week before you're banned.

Is that a good thing or bad thing?

How does it taste, by the way?

I'm genuinely confused. Are you talking to me or yourself? Because I don't want anyone to be banned nor am I offended. I don't think it's possible for me to be offended, actually...