Ichigo_Uchiha's forum posts
I am not biased on games, it's just that the old games seem a lot better to me, they have original stories, unlike the games of today where we have Saints Row, just a rip-off of GTA, with a little different features, even the new Sonic games, they mess up the aspect of what Sonic was all about way back when by adding all these new characters, then there's Turok, for example, it's just Jurassic Park all over, video-game style, Dead Rising, just how many zombie/"Psychopath" games are there now? Sorry, but I'm just sticking with the games I used to play, and their sequels/prequels until someone can prove to me not all games are copies anymore, or have an original storyline
Which type of game would you rather play/choose?
Choice A:
A game with a good/great storyline, with a little downgraded graphics, limited attacks, maybe even travel from place to place on some sort of world but it has the potential for a remake cause it sold so well, or that they may even make sequels or prequels cause it sold so well
Or
Choice B:
A game with a very sucky storyline to almost no story, the best graphics with so many attacks that look so cool, with no potential for a remake, cause it only sold so well due to graphics and attacks
Personally, I would choose Choice A because I'm the type of gamer that actually likes a game for the storyline, not the graphics, heck, it could be the best game in the entire universe, due just to graphics and attacks, and yet I would probably be playing something like Legend of Legaia or Tomba!
Log in to comment