Humphreyscraig0's comments

Avatar image for Humphreyscraig0
Humphreyscraig0

54

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By Humphreyscraig0

alzetek they both have motion blur, whats your point? EDOG A Gpus performance isnt fully dependant on the speed of one of the clocks, there are soooo many factors involved in the eventual graphics processing quality and speed that to explain them while making sure all my facts were correct would take so long that I cant be bothered to do it, look it up yourself if you are interested. PS3 75 GOps/s - 360 80 GOps/s PS3 50 GB/s bandwidth - 360 260 GB/s bandwidth (though apparently it is much less effiecient with its bandwidth) Im rather surprised to find out the PSU RSX is just a downtuned 7800

Avatar image for Humphreyscraig0
Humphreyscraig0

54

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By Humphreyscraig0

FAO doomsdaydave: I have been told that the 360 looks better in most cases due to its ATI graphics proccessor being superior to the (sony IIRC) one in the PS3 and because the 360 is much easier to build post proccesing filters for. Also espoac the 360 version is sharper than the PS3 version, its most noticable in the shadows, I have to say I prefer the ps3s colour pallete however.