@Celsius765 @GuillermoJP xD I can see what you're talking about here, for sure. In the case of different feel between each game, and Peach being able to take care of Bowser.
@Celsius765 Eh... Nintendo is at least trying new stuff with Harmoknights and such... But I'll agree that Mario could use another break before releasing another platformer. It might've been ten years for the first "New Super Marios Bros" to come out since the previous Mario Platformer, but the subsequent titles just look too similar.
@Solid_Chub @GuillermoJP And... you're basing this opinion upon the fact I have a pony for an avatar. Not exactly the "Wright" way to go about things...
-sighs- Seriously... people just saying things without thinking on what they're actually saying... "Oh, Nintendo makes the same game over and over again!"
But, that's only looking at one facet of things. As many have claimed before me, there is no company that isn't guilty of this. What I like about Nintendo, is that they're willing to try different things (in terms of gameplay and such), and if they have to use a familiar character to get me interested, I'm all for it I mean, Pokemon Mystery Dungeon was pretty fun, as was Paper Mario. I'll admit, that I don't like to buy new IP's willy-nilly, but because they were both familiar with me, it helped me to make that jump and spend my time and money on them, and it was well-spent.
@FAIL_TR0LL Well...G1 was Red/Blue/Yellow/GreenG2 was Gold/Silver/Crystal (which aren't really colors)G3 was Ruby/Sapphire/Emerald (precious stones)G4 was Diamond/Pearl/Platinum (...uh... expensive things)G5 was Black and White (tones)So... there's a lot they could've chosen from.In this case, X and Y are connected by the fact they are used on a graph. In this reasoning, the sequel (which there will be one, because... it's pretty much tradition by now) will be Z.Heh heh... Pokemon Z.
GuillermoJP's comments