It seems everyone here cares so much about something I could give so little sh*t about; graphics. If you're playing games for graphics, go watch a big dumb Hollywood movie. Games are about pulling you into an environment, and don't have to look photo-realistic. I play StarFox, I don't care that I'm not really a fox. I don't care that the world they're in is void of curved lines. If the gameplay is solid, I become emerged, regardless of the art style. Not every game has to meet your expectations on how it should look, and if they did, you'd be disappointed by every title that isn't A++. If you don't like the look of of, don't play it. I'll probably be picking this up.

@mrboone01 It's called journalistic integrity. A journalist can't say definitely the reasons for the name change, and can only speculate if they make it clear it's an opinion. So, if I were a journalist, I might say that it's possible you're a snobby kid with to much time on his hands.

I grew up playing this game non-stop. I loved it's atmosphere and creepy visuals. The soundtrack is one of my all-time favorites from the NES. Can't wait for this! :)

Richard - The trees are just one thing to look at. Look at the buildings in GTA4 (Not to mention the trees my gawddd! Look at the comparisons, seriously). Look at the rocks. Look at everything. TEXXTTUURREE ELLLIIIAAAHHH! The character models aren't going to change. The shape of the buildings aren't going to change, and neither is the rock. You have to inspect the texture, the 'surface'. The fact of the matter is, the PS3 doesn't have a great processor for textures, so they take it down. And the 360 is okay, but is limited. A super PC womps the hell out of the consoles, IN TERMS OF GRAPHICS. I would much rather have GTA4 on 360 though, because then I could ACTUALLY PLAY IT! You have to have a god-built computer to run GTA4.

If you want to see the true difference, look at the trees. It's quite obvious the winner is PC. It's clear, and has been for the longest. Systems are only as good as they are built when they are first released, and with limited capacity based on equipment costs and size... So a PC will always look better. But PC games also have the problem of being non-casual. 360 has better graphics over the PS3. I never would've believed it in the era of PS2 and XBOX, that it would be that way today. PS3 has a better physics engine though, IMO, and overall, a better single-player experience. Each platform has it's pluses and minuses, and we should reccognize them, and stop blindly loving our system. Love them all. Plain and simple. I play PC, 360, PS3 and Wii. But if I were a strict Wii owner, I would sound retarded if I said the Wii has the best graphics. You're just fooling yourself! Graphics go; PC, 360, PS3, Wii. Casual goes; Wii, PS3, 360, PC Did you notice it's switched. So chill out everyone. For console, if graphics is all you care about, go 360. For the best physics and selection of 'weekend' type games, go PS3. For easiest to pick up and just play, Wii. For the best RTSs, and FPSs, and if you have a ton of money, go PC.