[QUOTE="GamerForca"][QUOTE="Renegade_Fury"][QUOTE="GameFreak315"][QUOTE="Renegade_Fury"]

[QUOTE="UrbanSpartan125"]24? -/+ a couple of years.Cutekitten6_18

18?

Seventeen? Obviously a guess. :P

nope

17?


:P

*goes back two years* WINNAR!!1six!!1!

[QUOTE="GameFreak315"][QUOTE="Renegade_Fury"]

[QUOTE="UrbanSpartan125"]24? -/+ a couple of years.Renegade_Fury

18?

Seventeen? Obviously a guess. :P

nope

17?


:P

Actually it makes sense, LSU didn't play in the championship game yet they went to a BCS gmae vs. ND.LSUTIGERMAN

But Florida went to the NCG, which left room for another SEC team.

Not much, I'll admit. It's an aside to an aside to an aside.

But if I'm forced to throw my 2 cents in, I'd have to agree with most of what muppet1010's been writing. The German navy was substantial, just incorrectly utilised. Hitler had most of them tucked away in well-protected harbours, which was pretty silly.

Had the Axis powers won, for whatever reason, they would have extended across the whole of Europe and Asia, and probably down to Australia too. Lord knows Africa wouldn't have stood for long, what with few standing armies and all of the German colonies there already.

That's four continents' worth of material and potential conscripts, which equals a well-equipped and manned army.

America would have been the biggest threat, and therefore be top of the list in terms of future invasions. It would have been a protracted war, but one that the States would probably lost in the end.

As for the nukes, I really can't say... Could have gone either way as far as I'm concerned.

Of course this is all conjecture, but so far everything already in this thread is too, so meh...

PhaedrusTheWolf

Yeah, if Germany could its the people in its newly acquired land (though it's doubtful) to fight for it, then I could see the US possibly losing that war. Maybe......

Btw, Germany didn't have any colonies in Africa. It took some from France and England in north Africa, and that's it. Africa didn't need to be under German control though, since Italy, Portugal, and Spain controlled chunks of it, and all were under dictatorships. The rest would've fallen.

[QUOTE="GamerForca"]

I'd go with the AK47. More reliable, and much stronger.

LJS9502_basic

It's only as accurate as the shooter....same as the AK47.;)

Exactly. And that's probably a reason why my father thought the AK47 was about equal to the M-16 in accuracy. He grew up with guns and was a great shot no matter what he used. The M-16 did have advantages though. Like being lighter and less recoil.

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]The M16's bolt seizes at any foreign matter being present. It is also a hassle to clean and assemble. The AK47 can be submerged in water, submerged in sand, run over by a Hummer and still picked up and fired. The M16 may be a tad more accurate but the AK47 with its stupendous reliability, ease of use/manufacture and 7.62mm round, it is the far superior weapon.NicktehImperial

Oh, its ALOT more accurate, you know that my dad was a MArine right???

It needs to be cleaned frequently but its not like when it first came out in Nam, that was pretty bad, but its much more reliable now.

Since when did you come a wea, oh wait your a Canadian, I heard all you guys have lots of guns!!!

My dad was a marine, and didn't think that the M-16 was much more accurate at all.

I'd go with the AK47. More reliable, and much stronger.

[QUOTE="GamerForca"]

edit: and Canada wasn't part of Britain during WWII......

PhaedrusTheWolf

Canada wasn't a part of the British Empire, you're right... but it was a part of the Commonwealth. So was South Africa and Australia. They all fought too - long before the US.

Yeah, andI still don't see what this has to do with Germany crossing the Atlantic and defeating the Americas.

actually canada was in the war way before America even concidered it. Because they were apart of the British empire and went to war with the british empire not America.... so did hundreds of thousands of other troops in the british empire... Britain had a colossal army at its command, far greater than any other powers if it so wished to force its empire to give everything it had.

muppet1010

Ok, I don't see what this has to do with Germany taking over the States, but whatever...
edit: and Canada wasn't part of Britain during WWII......

and the nukes would have finished everyone off? Germany would have nukes before america if they defeated the allies.

muppet1010

They MIGHT have had nukes, and they MIGHT have had the ability to drop one on the US. They were sabotaged anyway. By the time they had the ability to launch long-range missiles, both sides would've had them.

[QUOTE="Heil68"]Wow..A reason not to buy the Wii ;)BlazeDragon132

The only true console now is PSP! Wait....how did that happen?

Pimp My Ride. ;)