DemoPan7's forum posts

Avatar image for DemoPan7
DemoPan7

187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 DemoPan7
Member since 2011 • 187 Posts
those WiiU specs were from an anonymous source.... why is everyone saying they're official?
Avatar image for DemoPan7
DemoPan7

187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 DemoPan7
Member since 2011 • 187 Posts
if someone doesnt mind... please make a gif out of this!
Avatar image for DemoPan7
DemoPan7

187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 DemoPan7
Member since 2011 • 187 Posts
reading comprehension fail. This isn't a confirmation of anything, it's just Geoff going off the same info we've known about since GDC, which is that the Wii-U will be running UE3.9 This doesn't mean that Wii-U will be exclusively UE3.9.
Avatar image for DemoPan7
DemoPan7

187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 DemoPan7
Member since 2011 • 187 Posts
[QUOTE="DemoPan7"][QUOTE="Wasdie"]

Which is hilarious because that means Nintendo still wont let you at least watch your blu-rays on it.

Chris_Williams
Which is great because that means the system would be cheaper and be an actual video gaming system and not a movie watching one.

blu-rays are cheap as hell now, if the wii-u did have blu-ray it would be the same price as adding a regular dvd disc drive.

Indeed they are dirt cheap. Which is why it's pointless to put it in the console.
Avatar image for DemoPan7
DemoPan7

187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 DemoPan7
Member since 2011 • 187 Posts

[QUOTE="bonesawisready5"]It's already confirmed to use iDensity discs which have similar capacities to blu ray but it won't use blurayWasdie

Which is hilarious because that means Nintendo still wont let you at least watch your blu-rays on it.

Which is great because that means the system would be cheaper and be an actual video gaming system and not a movie watching one.
Avatar image for DemoPan7
DemoPan7

187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 DemoPan7
Member since 2011 • 187 Posts

[QUOTE="DarkOfKnight"]2 GB of RAM isn't enough.nameless12345

It's four times as much as 360 and PS3 have...

Combined with a good enough GPU and CPU, you should be looking at BF3 and Crysis 2 PC level graphics (which would be impressive for a console).

actually it's even more than four times since this is just counting the RAM. It'd be more if you factor in the VRAM which would probably be another gig
Avatar image for DemoPan7
DemoPan7

187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 DemoPan7
Member since 2011 • 187 Posts
You won't be able to upgrade the processor unless you get a whole new motherboard since the newer i7's use the LGA 1155 socket
Avatar image for DemoPan7
DemoPan7

187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 DemoPan7
Member since 2011 • 187 Posts

[QUOTE="Baranga"]

ff_unreal4_firstldkkn.jpg.

TheShadowLord07

forgot abour samaritan. make this into a video game. this looks way more awesome

Samaritan seems like a much more interesting game concept imo. But maaaaan does that look impressive O.O
Avatar image for DemoPan7
DemoPan7

187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 DemoPan7
Member since 2011 • 187 Posts

[QUOTE="DemoPan7"][QUOTE="Wasdie"]25 FPS.

Gotta love the "optimization" of the CryEngine 2.

Wasdie

Isn't that CryEngine 3?

I'm pretty sure this is CryEngine 2. This has been under development for awhile.

Yeah but I thought CE3 was the one with the yellow FPS counter
Avatar image for DemoPan7
DemoPan7

187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 DemoPan7
Member since 2011 • 187 Posts
25 FPS.

Gotta love the "optimization" of the CryEngine 2.

Wasdie
Isn't that CryEngine 3?