DeltaScremer's comments

Avatar image for DeltaScremer
DeltaScremer

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By DeltaScremer

this game is great. not that hey're exactly the most comparable, Ghost Recon: Future Soldier should have gotten a better review based off of this. both added individuality to cover-based shooters and had a lot of depth. Ghost Recon had bad graphics, but a great teamwork-based multiplayer. better than Max Payne's. Max Payne had a great campaign, so Ghost Recon should have gotten an 8.5. i'm getting both this summer.

Avatar image for DeltaScremer
DeltaScremer

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By DeltaScremer

@vsnake48 the campaign is really only like 5-hours, and even the lame one-on-one ship battles they put you in are just tedious and lacking of strategy. the ships are so easy to beat that you just mash buttons and win. DON'T BUY THIS GAME! TRUST ME, I only wish to help you.

Avatar image for DeltaScremer
DeltaScremer

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By DeltaScremer

how much more fucking remarkable can the gunplay be? what do other games like call of duty have that this game doesn't? nothing. i would get it if they said this about a game in a setting like Halo, but come on. give this game some slack. it's actually pretty badass.