Dark__Link's forum posts
fixed.[QUOTE="Rich3232"][QUOTE="coolbeans90"]
Your business is also with the waiter, whom the employer expects you to tip in accordance with how well he served, instead of paying the waiter directly. You do not seem to understand how the world works.
masiisam
Silly Americans...again the world doesn't revolve around you..so if you plan to fix something try not to look lile an idiot..
Most parts of the world doesn't require a tip..tips are appreciated...other parts like China take it as in insult to tip...
I'm pretty sure that "fix" was supposed to be insulting Laihendi's moronic views on a LOT of things, rather than saying the world works the way the US does. But nice job insulting an entire population for no reason, douchebag.Why post dribble in a thread if you aren't willing to read any of it?Anyway, why tip a waiter and not a supermarket cashier? Isn't this a huge double standard?
Khoaki
[QUOTE="Dark__Link"]Computational fluid dynamics.coolbeans90
That sounds like a really fun course.
The theory behind it was pretty hard to absorb (why I put it in this thread), but the using the actual CFD software was definitely one of the more interesting/fun things I did during my degree.Your post actully exemplifies my probem with tipping.[QUOTE="Dark__Link"]On average, you pay the same amount whether you're tipping or paying more for the meal (to pay the server a fair wage). In the tipping system, you control quality of service. Bad service? Small tip. Great service? Big tip. Server just did their job and nothing more? Regular tip (basically the amount the food prices would go up by without the tipping system). In the no-tipping system, you can't control the quality of service. Bad service? Tough sh*t, you pay full amount. Great service? Tough sh*t for the server, he gets the normal amount. So, if both systems see you paying the same amount (on average, obviously not case-by-case), then why would you pick the option that doesn't let you control the quality of the service?BuryMe
You aren't controlling the quality of the sevice. The service has already been rendered by the time you are supposed to tip.
And since a tip of 15% has become the expected norm, tipping any less generally just makes you look cheap, even if the waiter as bad.And worst, it's not uncommon for people to tip for bad service simply because they feel society compells them to.
If tipping wasn't expected the way it seems to be today, I would be more inclined to agree. But since tipping is the expected norm, it doesn't accomplish what people often credit it with (namely, improving service.)
Until that happens, I'd rather see waiters be paid a fair wage for their services, and bad employees should simply be let go.
You aren't controlling the quality right then and there, no, but you are controlling future quality. Waiter gets a big tip, he'll know he did something well, and he'll do it again. It's just conditioning, but that's how it works. As for the rest of your post... tipping really should be expected, because after all, you're paying for the service. When the bill comes, the amount stated is NOT to pay for your service. It's to pay for your food. But you're expected to pay for both the service and the food. So a basic 10-15% tip SHOULD be expected for so-so service because you're just paying for the service itself. Take some away, or add more depending on how they did beyond that.You'd see cost added to meals, why does it matter if that cost is called "tip"?I'd rather see the cost added to the cost of the meal than have it added in after you get the bill. On average, you pay the same amount whether you're tipping or paying more for the meal (to pay the server a fair wage).[QUOTE="thegerg"][QUOTE="BuryMe"]
I'm not a fan of tipping either, but Im kind of stuck since it's the expected practice.
I'd rather se waiters be paid a fair wage for their service, without adding tips to meals.
BuryMe
In the tipping system, you control quality of service. Bad service? Small tip. Great service? Big tip. Server just did their job and nothing more? Regular tip (basically the amount the food prices would go up by without the tipping system).
In the no-tipping system, you can't control the quality of service. Bad service? Tough sh*t, you pay full amount. Great service? Tough sh*t for the server, he gets the normal amount.
So, if both systems see you paying the same amount (on average, obviously not case-by-case), then why would you pick the option that doesn't let you control the quality of the service?
The ONLY person who benefits from a no-tipping system is the waiter who does the bare minimum to keep his job.
Log in to comment