[QUOTE="Vaasman"]

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"] Not even out yet, kiddo.princeofshapeir

Maybe if you had said fastest selling game this year so far, I could let it slide.

[QUOTE="Aceback"]

[QUOTE="argetlam00"]

You're a moron. Vivendi and Activision merged, but Blizzard Entertainment is still separate from Activision and retains its original design teams. This myth that Blizzard has been destroyed by Activision the same way Bioware was ruined by EA is patently absurd.princeofshapeir

[QUOTE="Aceback"][QUOTE="argetlam00"]

Blizzard Entertainment and Activision are separate entities. Why is this hard for people to understand?argetlam00

[QUOTE="OB-47"]

[QUOTE="argetlam00"]

People care what Gamespot scores a Blizzard game?

argetlam00

Why not?

Because its like caring what a kindergardener rated SC2. Gamespot shouldn't even review PC games IMO. We have our own communities. For instance, the ONLY opinion that matters about SC2 is teamliquid. If teamliquid didnt like SC2 then it wouldn't matter one bit if every critic on the planet gave the game 10/10 and game of the generation awards. Wouldn't change the fact that the game is **** Same thing with Diablo 3. Doesn't matter at all what gamespot gives it.

Didn't play its full version, but the demo was very good, I also liked its mocking reference towards corrupt leftist banana republic regimes, very nice. Graphics wise it was good too. Didn't play Tropico 4.

[QUOTE="ZombieKiller7"]

[QUOTE="GioVela2010"] PC is perfect for poor people mitu123

Seriously I don't understand why everyone says consoles are for peasants, it's more expensive, PC is the cheapest form of gaming and doubles as an office.

I'm rich so I can afford to indulge my preferences.

If I was poor I'd only have a PC.

[QUOTE="jwsoul"][QUOTE="Wasdie"]

Aritificaldifficulty. Aritifical difficulty everywhere.

Wasdie

Bad, bad bad bad.

Modifying the accuracy of weapons to make them useless, giving the enemy a massive line of sight and a lot of health, and giving you barely any supplies isn't difficulty, it's pure bs.

[QUOTE="Deevoshun"]

[QUOTE="Frozzik"]Blizzard is simply moving with the times. Their games are designed to appeal to the wider audience. I'm all for it, I loved Starcraft 2, I enjoy WoW and played it at launch. I love Diablo 3. I think they have done a great job. At the end of the Day they can't please everyone, looking at the sales, 6.5 million in a week, there is bound to be many who are disappointed. If they kept it like 1 and 2 thousands would complain it hasn't changed enough, just like with Starcraft 2. They change it and the fans all kick off its not like the good old days. Seems to me Blizzard are a victim of their own success. So they do what they can to appeal to as many as they can. The result is a vast majority of happy gamers. Or maybe I'm just talking **** lolprinceofshapeir

Blizzard always changed with the times, Diablo 1 was a hack-n-slash innovation that spawned a lot of copy-cats. World of Warcraft at the time was a refreshing and well executed MMO that put together the best features of all other MMOs at the time and made them better. These were games made by gamers for gamers, now everything feels dumbed down to the lowest common denominator. Now they are just cashing in on what ever they can, Blizzard-Activition is turning all their franchises into Call of Duty's.

[QUOTE="Aceback"]

So, what everyone cares about is graphics. Why not go watch movies instead?

freedomfreak