1q3er5's comments

Avatar image for 1q3er5
1q3er5

759

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By 1q3er5

whats the point of these articles, you already know the PC is going to spank the consoles. Amatuer writers at gamespot writing poor articles comparing shadows and lighting ...get real..

Avatar image for 1q3er5
1q3er5

759

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By 1q3er5

Suprised that the 4 COD's have virtually no improvement when all 4 run on the same console who's capabilities have never improved? Whats the point of this article really? To top it off gamespot which now clearly caters toward the console crowd, decides to use the PC version for the comparision which handles COD's with ease, even though its poorly optimized for it. Now imagine if for all the 4 COD's they made on the PC version first and THEN watered it down, gutted it, and stripped it of its bling for the consoles. Sigh...whatever...

Avatar image for 1q3er5
1q3er5

759

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By 1q3er5

Windows 7 should be compared to Windows XP not Windows Vista. I wish microsoft would stop making stuff like writing recognition and focus on the basics! A fast efficient OS. What were these clowns thinking with the bloated Vista OS! Does Microsoft have a strategy to convince everyone to finally switch over to the 64 bit OS??????? They need to focus on making a PROPER program to allow all 32 bit programs to run under a 64 bit OS if they finally want to get everyone on board. I wish more PC game developers used OpenGL instead of direct X, Linux will never get direct x but opengl is just as good and its open source

Avatar image for 1q3er5
1q3er5

759

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By 1q3er5

No true hermit would complain about not having PC screens in comparisions. It's pointless for obvious reasons....PC's are more powerful, the games they are comparing were MADE for Consoles first with the PC being an afterthought. So that actually makes it look like PC's are not that far ahead of consoles as they truely are. Why not compare one game from each of the systems like crysis for PC, msg for ps3, and say geow2 for the xbox. That'll would hush the doubters. The note about the PC costing 3 to 4 times as much disgusts me. Obviously the writer doesn't know jack about PC's because even a mid range PC would win the screens and that would cost 500 bucks and you can actually do other stuff on it too besides gaming....sigh good job writer....THIS ARTICLE IS WORTHY OF BEING INSIDE SYSTEM WARS...and should be flagged for trolling....

Avatar image for 1q3er5
1q3er5

759

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By 1q3er5

Why don't they do a 360 vs PC comparison. SHUT THESE 360 trolls right up. Roll your mouse over the picture to see the highest to lowest settings : High Medium Low and.....360

Avatar image for 1q3er5
1q3er5

759

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By 1q3er5

Sins of a solar looks like the best, but you know starcraft 2 will outsell it 10 to 1. :(