Tommyxx516 said: "I'd say it's doing a pretty darn good job at keeping up with the latest in PC." Too bad you're wrong. If the 360 can't even play all it's games at 720p resolution (halo 3 is 640p) where as my PC - which is almost two years old now - can run these games at 1600p...and the 360's texture quality is lower than the PC version running at medium...then no, it's not keeping up. It's just limping along. They really have to cut the graphics down to put them on the 360 and PS3. The difference between PC and 360 is as wide as the divide between the 360 and the Wii. What I will give the 360 is the fact that it's doing better than the PS3 on these multi-platform games. You can't even see Niko's face on the PS3 version of GTA 4! :P

Alex055: It's linked in the article. Right where they mention enabling very high quality in XP.

I am a zombie purist in most rights but I feel that the "Headcrab Zombies" in Half-Life are in fact zombies for the simple fact that the parasite has eaten their brain. Without the brain a human is pretty much dead. While they do not go through death and then resurrection they're still human corpses moving around albeit under the control of a parasite - they're not really alive as without the parasite on their heads they will collapse instantly. The villagers in RE5 though are not zombies as their brains and bodies are intact - they are simply "infected". But yeah...zombies...I love zombies.