Who's Happy about what they're doing to Call Of Duty 5??

Just wait for CoD6, it will be infintry ward and modern again,

I like when they make there own story line, CoD4's story line was amazing, just like a movie

[QUOTE="soufan123"]

Does anyone like it that CoD5 is goin back to a WW2 setting?? Im not, im pissed.. I mean all of the other CoD games were like stepping stones to CoD4, but now they're going back?? I would think that they would recognize how amazing CoD4 did, and create another one, with a similar setting.. I was thinking maybe like a World War 3 or somethin.

Enraged_Bannana

you are wrong. i heard on g4tv that cod5 was going to be a new setting which means no ww2 or modern

If i believed stuff i heard on XBL i would have stopped kissing my mom goodnight a long time ago.

[QUOTE="kerrman"]

Uhm.. as far as the last press release goes there is no confirmation that the game is switching to WW2 or changing hands of developers.

Anything new out that disproves that? 'cause I'm curious as all hell.

WMDfreeman99

its already been confirmed that tryarch is developing COD5.. The setting is not been confirmed through

Somebody probably already answered this, but I haven't read all the posts- it's in the pacific back in WW2 yep yep yep

Yay..

Bolt action rifles and 7 shot pistols... my favorite...

:roll:

I can't be happy with CoD5, especially since the only details we know is that Treyarch is developing it. I actually have no problem, I really enjoyed Big Red One and CoD3. CoD4 is really the first game from Infinity Ward I own (I only played a bit of CoD2).

I'll just wait until I start seeing footage of the game. Then I can say if I'm happy or not.

I can't be happy with CoD5, especially since the only details we know is that Treyarch is developing it. I actually have no problem, I really enjoyed Big Red One and CoD3. CoD4 is really the first game from Infinity Ward I own (I only played a bit of CoD2).

I'll just wait until I start seeing footage of the game. Then I can say if I'm happy or not.

ZeroWil

PPl are bashing the hell out of this game cause it's developed by Treyarch, what I wonder is what have treyarch done so diffrently than Infinity ward with the ww2 setting? COD2 - crappy acting, bad physics, zero empathy for the soldiers by your side cause they'll take a grenade to the face and stand back up, bad lines in general. Why did i love it? cause I like ww2 and the previous COD's and the fact that it feels like ur in a warzone, everything is chaos.

Cod3 - Crappy storytelling, characters, bad voice acting, sligthly less crappy physics, and I wouldn't give a crap if any of the main characters died. What's so diffrent with COD2 and COD3? it's diffrent chapters of the same game. Some critic said; I'm sick of ww2, I like Infinity Ward better than Treyarch, then all hell broke loose. Some ppl just absorbed it and passed it on like the word n00b, now it's a dam trend to hate Treyarch, I don't even hear any good reasons anymore, ppl just hate them cause everyone else does. Fanboyism at its worst, and that word is getting so old too I'll just stop now... right after saying wake up ppl! grow ur own dam opinions and a mine of your own.

Does anyone like it that CoD5 is goin back to a WW2 setting?? Im not, im pissed.. I mean all of the other CoD games were like stepping stones to CoD4, but now they're going back?? I would think that they would recognize how amazing CoD4 did, and create another one, with a similar setting.. I was thinking maybe like a World War 3 or somethin.

soufan123

Call od Duty 2 was much better than COD4, even though it was in WW2, the only problem i see with COD5, is the change of deveopers, they made that piece of crap, how was it called? oh yeah COD3.

[QUOTE="ZeroWil"]

I can't be happy with CoD5, especially since the only details we know is that Treyarch is developing it. I actually have no problem, I really enjoyed Big Red One and CoD3. CoD4 is really the first game from Infinity Ward I own (I only played a bit of CoD2).

I'll just wait until I start seeing footage of the game. Then I can say if I'm happy or not.

Keitarourashima

PPl are bashing the hell out of this game cause it's developed by Treyarch, what I wonder is what have treyarch done so diffrently than Infinity ward with the ww2 setting? COD2 - crappy acting, bad physics, zero empathy for the soldiers by your side cause they'll take a grenade to the face and stand back up, bad lines in general. Why did i love it? cause I like ww2 and the previous COD's and the fact that it feels like ur in a warzone, everything is chaos.

Cod3 - Crappy storytelling, characters, bad voice acting, sligthly less crappy physics, and I wouldn't give a crap if any of the main characters died. What's so diffrent with COD2 and COD3? it's diffrent chapters of the same game. Some critic said; I'm sick of ww2, I like Infinity Ward better than Treyarch, then all hell broke loose. Some ppl just absorbed it and passed it on like the word n00b, now it's a dam trend to hate Treyarch, I don't even hear any good reasons anymore, ppl just hate them cause everyone else does. Fanboyism at its worst, and that word is getting so old too I'll just stop now... right after saying wake up ppl! grow ur own dam opinions and a mine of your own.

Says the guy who bought GoW, Assasin's Creed and GTAIV, the most hyped overated pieces of crap in history.

Personally, I do not care about what happens to the Call of Duty series anymore. Personally I think WW2 is a lot better and the only game who is going to bring back WW2 generation is Brothers in Arms: Hells Highway. Call of Duty is a dead series to me. Fanboys don't spaz on me.

Why is everybody so upset about the switch in developers? Infinity Ward and Trechyarch have been going back and forth in creating the CoD franchise and the reason for that is right after you play one CoD the next one comes out about a year later. So it just gives each developer more time to create each CoD, so that way Infinity Ward is not in a rush to meet each deadline. And not to mention CoD3 was not that bad and CoD4's multiplayer was based off the multiplayer of CoD3. It was just an upgraded version of it. Just be happy that Spark Unlimited isn't creating this CoD (Spark Unlimited did CoD Finest Hour). Before CoD4 was even announced gamers were asking if they could make a WWII game that took place in Japan, so they just let Trechyarch do it so they can work on the next CoD: Modern Warfare game which will be CoD6. So yes I cannot wait for Call of Duty 5. And a couple of months after CoD5 comes out I guarantee you that CoD6 will be announced and that will be made by Infinity Ward and will be modern combat.

Ya when i first started playing cod4 i felt like i was playing and older cod. once you unlock the mp44 there is nothing stopping you from thinking its still WWII. The environments look anything but modern. I guess because its not in the U.S or Canada but there is no reason why something set in the time period should look like something set in the 40's.

If you looks at other parts of the world besides U.S and other rich countries like Britain you'll understand that not all architecture in the world have shiny glass buildings and such. If you ever saw any videos of our soldiers fighting in urban Iraq cities today it resembles a lot of what you see in COD4's enviroment. The clostest enviroment that the game has to our architecture is the "All Ghilli up" level.

Anyways I don't mind Treyarch making another WWII game because that mean Infinity Wards will have more time to work on their next COD games. Besides that reason I'm also interested in what setting Treyarch is planning on doing COD5 in. Lets just say I'm not bored of WWII yet because I do believe there is still room to make great WWII games besides crappy WWII games that was made over the past years. For example look at what Brother in Arms Hell's Highway is shaping into.

it has been confirmed that treyarch is developing a new call of duty game in a different time period than modern warfare was, but ww2 wasn't specified. i'm hoping for 'nam, cause it's never had a game that could do it justice.luigismansion101

now THATS an idea. vietnam gaming (which has been abysmal to date) meets the awesome quality of cod4. although maybe in an altered reality, i'm thinking 80's, more futuristic weapons... and why not throw the good old soviet union in while your at it. makes for a more fictional setting = more epic moments, cod4 nuke anyone?? great idea anyway

[QUOTE="soufan123"]

Does anyone like it that CoD5 is goin back to a WW2 setting?? Im not, im pissed.. I mean all of the other CoD games were like stepping stones to CoD4, but now they're going back?? I would think that they would recognize how amazing CoD4 did, and create another one, with a similar setting.. I was thinking maybe like a World War 3 or somethin.

Enraged_Bannana

you are wrong. i heard on g4tv that cod5 was going to be a new setting which means no ww2 or modern

I never played a Call of Duty game until Modern Warfare was released. I absolutely loved it. It got things right on so many levels with the FPS genre, especially the multiplayer. If COD5 is going back to WWII I think they are making a big mistake that they will end up regretting.Rat-Bastard