[QUOTE="RobNBanks"]
[QUOTE="slvrraven9"] bae games dont get nominated for game of the year. now do they sell 5 mill copies in a day. regardless of what YOUR personal feeling of the game is. its a good game. and no i dont feel theres a balancing issue...thats why they have the skill perk system and difference weapons. if you dont like the game thats fine, obviously nothing im gonna say will sell u on a different idea but thats not my idea anyway. glitches or not...at least the developers take the time to correct the problems they see in theire product....thats called being a good developer. its also pretty obvious COD is meant to be a competitive games which is why you have a ranking system and also leaderboards. Money doesnt define what is or isnt a good time or fair gameplay...nor does it mean things need to me all screwed up messed up because theres none in the equation..... how bout, because i paid my 60 dollars i expect to have fair and equal gameplay which is why IW has taken the time to correct their mistakes, because they use the same logic. your logic for needing it to be a fair game or competitive games is sooo stupid its not even funny...but everyones entitled to their own opinonDark5tar1
Difference in weapons, yet only 5 of them are useful. Wanna know what they are? M16, ACR, SCAR, Akimbo Rangers, Akimbo Model 1887. Perks in no way should even be associated with the word skill as all they do is casualize gameplay.
It takes two or more headshots with nearly every other weapon, POINT BLANK range in MW2 to kill someone. I tested it out with my friend on MY host and it took 3 shots with an M4. That's you're idea of a good game? Ok, that's nice.
By the way, one M4 shot to the toe killed him. Oh yeah, what a great game. :roll:
I also never said that things need to be screwed up because there's no money involved, don't know where ou pulled that out of but ok. All I said was the game is actually more fair and balanced now with everything screwed up than it was prior.
Being a good developer is releasing a beta for your game to make sure there are as little bugs and glitches as possible. It's also to make sure the game is balanced, not needing an update every two weeks to try and fix the game. StarCraft 2 is going to sell millions, but guess what, Blizzard is still doing a very thorough beta to make sure when the game is released, people get to enjoy it.
Halo 3 was guaranteed 5 million sales easily, but guess what? Bungie still did a beta because they wanted to make sure the fans could play the game on release.
THOSE are good developers.
Bad developers, Infinity Ward. They did good with COD4, even though their beta was useless because it was more of a multiplayer demo, as the game was still flawed when released. People like you then hyped them up to be the greatest developers ever, COD4 was the king of all shooters so they figured, hey, no need for a beta because everyones going to buy the game anyway. Now look at what we have, a complete mess of a game less than a month into release.
The game won't be playable for months because they decided to cut corners, and yet ignorant little kids like you and everyone else in this thread will just openly accept it and continue to praise IW on doing nothing but taking your money. Good job kids, thanks for helping kill gaming.
Bungie had a lot of bugs when Halo 3 released but Infinity Ward are good developers if they make a game that beats Halo 3 in sales at the first day it was released, plus Bungie had a mediocre campaign especially when it comes to ODST, MW2's story is Generic but the multiplayer is classic and can trump over Bungie anyday. All Bungie did for ODST was repackage Halo 3 with firefight, campaign, and 3 new MP maps, no gamechangers to the already boring mp. Plus Infinity Ward is a critically aclaimed studio that has proven their product with time and great multiplayer. Bungie disappointed with ODST but hopefully bring back the series in Reach.
Nice, attack the Halo franchise which is more critically acclaimed than COD.
Of course it was going to beat it in sales, it's multiplatform.
Good job dogding EVERY ONE of my points and challenges, only resorting to personal attacks and insults. I'm going back to SW, at least people there actually attempt to counter points, not just use personal attacks and insults to "win" an argument.
Log in to comment