[QUOTE="Shame-usBlackley"]
[QUOTE="brucecambell"]
They are complaining because they didn't like the last 15 minutes. It is widley agreed upon that entire game up to that point as amazing. If they weren't happy the majority of the way through that would be something to complain about.
But to enjoy all 30 hrs of a game & then claim that 30 hrs is not worth your money all because they disagreed with the last 15 mintues is ridiculous. Lets be honest, how many endings suck these days? A sh** load!
This doesnt mean you demand your money back because you didn't agree with the ending. The complaining has gone too far. Period.
Gemini_Red
I agree with you to a degree, because a lot of games DO end shi*ty and no one says a thing, but who am I (or you, or anyone) to tell them that they have to be happy about it? Here is an important couple of facts though about RPGs:
RPGs are typically HEAVILY STORY-ORIENTED. As such, the ending in an RPG carries more weight than it does in, say, Contra, because the player has invested time and emotional interest in the development of the characters. This is exacerbated when it spans multiple titles. I'm no expert on Mass Effect (I stopped playing after the first game was released broken and unfinished), but I have friends who ARE, and those friends did not play through three games because Mass Effect was a kickass shooter or had amazing animation -- they played it to see how it ended. Anecdotal, sure, but I think it fair to suppose that there were MANY who felt this way.
RPGs have, in the past, offered players several different possible outcomes. Releasing a second (alternate) ending would not hurt the artistic merit of the medium at all. It's been done a number of times in many different genres. Some movies have different endings made when the originally planned one doesn't screen well. One of my favorite series (The Dark Tower) came with an alt ending, which is typically NOT something found in a novel. It irked me at first, but if its inclusion meant it made the fans happy, I came to be fine with it. I just chose to go with the ending I felt suited the story best.
Bottom line? I'm not going to sit here and tell someone who paid way too much time and money on three different games to drink a cup of shut the fuc* up and "quit whining" or any of the other nonsense I'm hearing. If they are unhappy, let them BITC*, they paid plenty to have that right in my opinion, and their beef (at least based on face value) has some merit. Not liking the ending to a series does not seem unreasonable to me, at all. Baking cupcakes? Sure, it's snotty. But who cares? Why would I care if they send Bioware cupcakes? It has no effect on me, and if it gets them an alternate ending, how is that going to hurt you or anyone else in this thread?
I have nothing against people complaining, but when people are demanding something that's when things rub me the wrong way. Don't get me wrong some things that are demanded I condone and even encourage, like glitches and framerate issues so bad they make the game unplayable(looks at Bethesda). Demanding a change to the ending because you didn't like it? Bull****
Even worse Bioware is apparently caving, and frankly I think that's bad for the industry. Where does it stop after that? "We don't like this level. Change it!!" "We hate this character, remove him!" and so on. Over the past couple of years, and I'm sure people are tired of hearing the term, some gamers really feel they are entitled to certain things they should have no say of at all. Again, spending 60+ bucks on a game you can't play due to technical issues? Have at it. Spending money on a series that has given people 80+ hours of solid gameplay and complaining to the point of demanding a change of the last 15 minutes? Bull****.
If you would have played the game and cared for the storyline, then you should understand. In any case Bioware suggested that they have many and different endings, which was hardly the case. Furthermore your argument 'where does it stop' is completely out of place, wether you like it our not, Mass Effect is a product and as a result depends on the demands of consumers.
It keeps on annoying me that people make up this entitled nonsense, it's a businesses and satisfying the market is the most important aspect of maintaining a durable franchise. If there is any hype or cool thing going on, then it's protecting developers and publishers for reasons that are beyond logic sense.
Log in to comment