Xbox 360 couldn't handle Killzone 2...LoL

http://www.next-gen.biz/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=7031&Itemid=2

...and yet lemms still praying that MGS4 would go to the 360.....pffffffffffffffffffff.

ps: check out the comments at the bottom of the page from the haters...

Factor 5 said the same thing about Lair :lol: Guess how much we want that game :lol:

Sorry to tell you but "lemms" are not worried about KZ2 and MGS4.I always see them talking about the positives in their forum like Halo 3, Mass Effect, COD4, AC, GTA IV, and so on.The 360 hasn't had many flops yet and the PS3 has already had Motorstorm, Lair, and by the looks of other reviews so far Heavenly Sword.

every sony first party said so, sth new?:D

yeah I know how desperate sony wonna promot their tech cell and blueray.

They did mention about going multiflat but...

"If you're developing a game on multiple platforms there are restrictions you always have to take into consideration."

the first stage already took them 2Gb so just think how all the stages would fit on a DVD?

Hideo K. even mentioned that MGS4 wouldn't fit on a blue-ray itself so how is it going to fit and play on the 360?

even if these games are compressed, it still won't fit on aDVD.

that's just my opinion.

Yeah... poor cows, they'll be getting the best games for the next few years, oh well...

wish i could post more but it's time for more WARHAWK and T5DR:Online.

Yeah... poor cows, they'll be getting the best games for the next few years, oh well...

wish i could post more but it's time for more WARHAWK and T5DR:Online.

AKuMA_G0

factor 5: "it can only be done on the ps3"

lair - 4.5 :lol:

and now more 1st party devs are saying the same thing. do you cows lack logic, intelligence, ability to learn, or just plain common sense. didn't you learn anything from that flop?

Yeah... poor cows, they'll be getting the best games for the next few years, oh well...

wish i could post more but it's time for more WARHAWK and T5DR:Online.

AKuMA_G0

Is it actually possible to play Warhawk online- from what ive been hearing due to Sony online being so amazing u cant lol

its just more sony lies..im afraid.

Factor 5 said the same thing about Lair :lol: Guess how much we want that game :lol:

SgtWhiskeyjack

Once again another irrelavent post. What the hell does the game being crap have to do with the fact that it is technically impressive. It plays like crap but it looks great. So maybe factor 5 was right, the game cant be done on the X360 from a technical standpoint, even if the game sucked. And what does you wanting or not wanting it have to do with the game not being possible on the X360? people are so random these days...

[QUOTE="SgtWhiskeyjack"]

Factor 5 said the same thing about Lair :lol: Guess how much we want that game :lol:

Viviath

Once again another irrelavent post. What the hell does the game being crap have to do with the fact that it is technically impressive. It plays like crap but it looks great. So maybe factor 5 was right, the game cant be done on the X360 from a technical standpoint, even if the game sucked. And what does you wanting or not wanting it have to do with the game not being possible on the X360? people are so random these days...

[QUOTE="CrazyCarter"]

factor 5: "it can only be done on the ps3"

lair - 4.5 :lol:

and now more 1st party devs are saying the same thing. do you cows lack logic, intelligence, ability to learn, or just plain common sense. didn't you learn anything from that flop?

VACASCULIADAS

wow. thats sad. i bet this is what the devs of sony are thinking "s***, other ps3 games are flopping so what will happen to ours. oh i know. lets make ridiclous claims about the ps3 and our game and cows will be stupid enough to believe us." :lol: looks like sony and their 1st party devs are becoming desperate and make the gaming industry look bad.

[QUOTE="VACASCULIADAS"][QUOTE="CrazyCarter"]

factor 5: "it can only be done on the ps3"

lair - 4.5 :lol:

and now more 1st party devs are saying the same thing. do you cows lack logic, intelligence, ability to learn, or just plain common sense. didn't you learn anything from that flop?

CrazyCarter

wow. thats sad. i bet this is what the devs of sony are thinking "s***, other ps3 games are flopping so what will happen to ours. oh i know. lets make ridiclous claims about the ps3 and our game and cows will be stupid enough to believe us." :lol: looks like sony and their 1st party devs are becoming desperate and make the gaming industry look bad.

[QUOTE="Viviath"][QUOTE="SgtWhiskeyjack"]

Factor 5 said the same thing about Lair :lol: Guess how much we want that game :lol:

VACASCULIADAS

Once again another irrelavent post. What the hell does the game being crap have to do with the fact that it is technically impressive. It plays like crap but it looks great. So maybe factor 5 was right, the game cant be done on the X360 from a technical standpoint, even if the game sucked. And what does you wanting or not wanting it have to do with the game not being possible on the X360? people are so random these days...

maybe so but im not arguing about whether Factor 5's statements are correct or not. The fact that Lair as frame problems doesnt mean it could be done on X360. If Crysis had framerate problems, it wouldnt mean its possible on X360/PS3. All I'm trying to say is that respond to what the TC is saying, not what you THINK he is saying. Its like those threads where people say "Can't wait for Crysis Demo! Its gonna be so hot!" then fanboys jump in and say "Well, Halo3 is gonna outsell it 5 to 1" like thats even a relavent comment.

[QUOTE="VACASCULIADAS"][QUOTE="Viviath"][QUOTE="SgtWhiskeyjack"]

Factor 5 said the same thing about Lair :lol: Guess how much we want that game :lol:

Viviath

Once again another irrelavent post. What the hell does the game being crap have to do with the fact that it is technically impressive. It plays like crap but it looks great. So maybe factor 5 was right, the game cant be done on the X360 from a technical standpoint, even if the game sucked. And what does you wanting or not wanting it have to do with the game not being possible on the X360? people are so random these days...

maybe so but im not arguing about whether Factor 5's statements are correct or not. The fact that Lair as frame problems doesnt mean it could be done on X360. If Crysis had framerate problems, it wouldnt mean its possible on X360/PS3. All I'm trying to say is that respond to what the TC is saying, not what you THINK he is saying. Its like those threads where people say "Can't wait for Crysis Demo! Its gonna be so hot!" then fanboys jump in and say "Well, Halo3 is gonna outsell it 5 to 1" like thats even a relavent comment.

http://www.next-gen.biz/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=7031&Itemid=2

...and yet lemms still praying that MGS4 would go to the 360.....pffffffffffffffffffff.

ps: check out the comments at the bottom of the page from the haters...

AKuMA_G0

And Epic said Ps3 can't handle Gears and as of right now, I'm seeing games on the Ps3 that already look better than Gears. :| I hate it when developers say "console X is better than console Y". :(

[QUOTE="AKuMA_G0"]

http://www.next-gen.biz/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=7031&Itemid=2

...and yet lemms still praying that MGS4 would go to the 360.....pffffffffffffffffffff.

ps: check out the comments at the bottom of the page from the haters...

leviathan91

And Epic said Ps3 can't handle Gears and as of right now, I'm seeing games on the Ps3 that already look better than Gears. :| I hate it when developers say "console X is better than console Y". :(

Most likely they said this is because of the memory. If they are utilizing clost to 100% of the 360's memory, then it wouldn't be able to run on the PS3 in its current form. So code/textures would have to be optimized and changed to work on it. Having said that, it's probably possible on the PS3 if they went back and recoded, in it's current form, it's very likely it can't run on the PS3 if they are maxing out the memory. Just like any PS3 game that was strictly built for it, it's a false claim as far as I'm concerned, they are just trying to push people away from wanting them to port it as far as I'm concerned.

[QUOTE="Viviath"][QUOTE="VACASCULIADAS"][QUOTE="Viviath"][QUOTE="SgtWhiskeyjack"]

Factor 5 said the same thing about Lair :lol: Guess how much we want that game :lol:

VACASCULIADAS

Once again another irrelavent post. What the hell does the game being crap have to do with the fact that it is technically impressive. It plays like crap but it looks great. So maybe factor 5 was right, the game cant be done on the X360 from a technical standpoint, even if the game sucked. And what does you wanting or not wanting it have to do with the game not being possible on the X360? people are so random these days...

maybe so but im not arguing about whether Factor 5's statements are correct or not. The fact that Lair as frame problems doesnt mean it could be done on X360. If Crysis had framerate problems, it wouldnt mean its possible on X360/PS3. All I'm trying to say is that respond to what the TC is saying, not what you THINK he is saying. Its like those threads where people say "Can't wait for Crysis Demo! Its gonna be so hot!" then fanboys jump in and say "Well, Halo3 is gonna outsell it 5 to 1" like thats even a relavent comment.

I agree with u 100% but im just saying people shouldnt make comments that have no bearing on what the TC is trying to say.

[QUOTE="AKuMA_G0"]

Yeah... poor cows, they'll be getting the best games for the next few years, oh well...

wish i could post more but it's time for more WARHAWK and T5DR:Online.

CwlHeddwyn

Is it actually possible to play Warhawk online- from what ive been hearing due to Sony online being so amazing u cant lol

how many 360 games have they developed again??

[QUOTE="VACASCULIADAS"][QUOTE="Viviath"][QUOTE="SgtWhiskeyjack"]

Factor 5 said the same thing about Lair :lol: Guess how much we want that game :lol:

Viviath

Once again another irrelavent post. What the hell does the game being crap have to do with the fact that it is technically impressive. It plays like crap but it looks great. So maybe factor 5 was right, the game cant be done on the X360 from a technical standpoint, even if the game sucked. And what does you wanting or not wanting it have to do with the game not being possible on the X360? people are so random these days...

maybe so but im not arguing about whether Factor 5's statements are correct or not. The fact that Lair as frame problems doesnt mean it could be done on X360. If Crysis had framerate problems, it wouldnt mean its possible on X360/PS3. All I'm trying to say is that respond to what the TC is saying, not what you THINK he is saying. Its like those threads where people say "Can't wait for Crysis Demo! Its gonna be so hot!" then fanboys jump in and say "Well, Halo3 is gonna outsell it 5 to 1" like thats even a relavent comment.

Killzones devs and Factor 5 develope soley for Sony. What I'm saying is that they are making comments just like Factor 5 did believing that it would back up Sony's claims that the PS3 has double the power of the 360. Everyone on GS now knows that that isn't the case, but the uninformed will believe what they read even though such a statement is as if Sony had said it themselves.

http://www.next-gen.biz/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=7031&Itemid=2

...and yet lemms still praying that MGS4 would go to the 360.....pffffffffffffffffffff.

ps: check out the comments at the bottom of the page from the haters...

AKuMA_G0

This is the same "Cell" processor that on paper.....can stop world hunger? :shock:

[QUOTE="CrazyCarter"]

factor 5: "it can only be done on the ps3"

lair - 4.5 :lol:

and now more 1st party devs are saying the same thing. do you cows lack logic, intelligence, ability to learn, or just plain common sense. didn't you learn anything from that flop?

VACASCULIADAS

Shows how much they know...

Roflol, when will the lies stop...

Looking at Killzone 2 textures, I'm preeeetty sure it won't take so much space. unless it's a new type of uncompressed-high-res -low-res-textures that I'm unaware of...

Roflol, when will the lies stop...

Looking at Killzone 2 textures, I'm preeeetty sure it won't take so much space. unless it's a new type of uncompressed-high-res -low-res-textures that I'm unaware of...

T3H_1337_N1NJ4

Man i wish i was like you guys. I just dont know how you can stand yourself making idiotic comments on purpose or not.

[QUOTE="CrazyCarter"]

factor 5: "it can only be done on the ps3"

lair - 4.5 :lol:

and now more 1st party devs are saying the same thing. do you cows lack logic, intelligence, ability to learn, or just plain common sense. didn't you learn anything from that flop?

VACASCULIADAS

No...no...no

Haven't you learned yet? According to cows, only when a PC has TEH CELL, TEH RSX, and TEH BLU-RAY will it be capable of running PS3 games.

Cows said it, so it must be true

[QUOTE="VACASCULIADAS"][QUOTE="CrazyCarter"]

factor 5: "it can only be done on the ps3"

lair - 4.5 :lol:

and now more 1st party devs are saying the same thing. do you cows lack logic, intelligence, ability to learn, or just plain common sense. didn't you learn anything from that flop?

LosDaddie

No...no...no

Haven't you learned yet? According to cows, only when a PC has TEH CELL, TEH RSX, and TEH BLU-RAY will it be capable of running PS3 games.

Cows said it, so it must be true

Yes, it is true. TEH CELL nothing on planet earth can compete with it. Even the military wants it!! :shock:

Yes, it is true. TEH CELL nothing on planet earth can compete with it. Even the military wants it!! :shock:

Magical_Zebra

Makes sense.

Folding @ Home has already proved the PS3 can cure cancer.

So the Cell is more powerful than the latest Core 2 Duo Quads??? ......

And the RSX can beat an 8800GTX Ultra???......

and the PS3s 256mb (dont know what speed ps3 ram is..)of ram can beat 2GB of DDR2 PC-800mhz???...

So the Cell is more powerful than the latest Core 2 Duo Quads??? ......

And the RSX can beat an 8800GTX Ultra???......

and the PS3s 256mb (dont know what speed ps3 ram is..)of ram can beat 2GB of DDR2 PC-800mhz???...

DAZZER7

I thought that much was obvious. Even if you overclock them.

So the Cell is more powerful than the latest Core 2 Duo Quads??? ......

And the RSX can beat an 8800GTX Ultra???......

and the PS3s 256mb (dont know what speed ps3 ram is..)of ram can beat 2GB of DDR2 PC-800mhz???...

DAZZER7

According to cows, no PC can touch the PS3's performance.

Wow...exclusive developers are saying that there game is not possible on another system.

This has happened about 20 times so far this gen.

What a joke.

Factor 5 said the same thing about Lair :lol: Guess how much we want that game :lol:

SgtWhiskeyjack

What do Lairs controls have to do with console power? Ignorant statment.

So the Cell is more powerful than the latest Core 2 Duo Quads??? ......

And the RSX can beat an 8800GTX Ultra???......

and the PS3s 256mb (dont know what speed ps3 ram is..)of ram can beat 2GB of DDR2 PC-800mhz???...

DAZZER7

The Cow said so, so it must be true :o

Remeber guys when Killflop 2 bomb's it CAN ONLY BE DONE ON THE PS3

Just like that Fantastic AAA game Lair :wink:

So the Cell is more powerful than the latest Core 2 Duo Quads??? ......

And the RSX can beat an 8800GTX Ultra???......

and the PS3s 256mb (dont know what speed ps3 ram is..)of ram can beat 2GB of DDR2 PC-800mhz???...

DAZZER7

as for RAM subtract 256 to 500 to run your OS. another 256 to 500 to run whatever is going on in your back ground and its really like 500 - 1.5GBs which is still greater than whats on the PS3.:p