This topic is locked from further discussion.
.... Nintendo could pump out photo realistic graphics and people like you would still rip them apart. It's Nintendo's first graphical ambition with the hardware, games will only look better on it as time goes on. There is the problem. They do not have anything in their catalog where those realistic graphics fit. The Zelda demo looked great but Nintendo will still have him talking like a 3 month old with a carrot stuck up his ass. Metroid will keep getting fished off to another developer. Nintendo can only do one thing. Characters like Mario and Pikmin. Little cartoon characters that they have milked for decades. And even those have been passed up. Mario cannot hold a candle to the new Rayman or Retro's Donkey Kong Country. Evev trying to play Zelda after something like Skyrim is a laugh. Nintendo had its games have been passed by.[QUOTE="Grey_Eyed_Elf"] I see... you mean when you compared Picmin 3 to Max Payne 3 and Gear's of War 3. Seems like I'm the one that wasted my time.umcommon
[QUOTE="umcommon"].... Nintendo could pump out photo realistic graphics and people like you would still rip them apart. It's Nintendo's first graphical ambition with the hardware, games will only look better on it as time goes on. People like me?... :| You mean a gamer who isn't so desperately lost in denial that he can't seem to admit that every NEW console that come out has had games that are better looking than what's already out when launched?[QUOTE="Grey_Eyed_Elf"] I see... you mean when you compared Picmin 3 to Max Payne 3 and Gear's of War 3. Seems like I'm the one that wasted my time.Grey_Eyed_Elf
Please give me actual proof of games that look noticeably better than Pikmin 3. Because Max Payne and Gears 3 don't look as good and I consider them impressive. I honestly fail to see what's so "underwelming" about Pikmin 3. Maybe it's just a matter of taste or the fact that everyone on this board is glued to their M rated-only 360 library, but I think the game looks impressive... Maybe not the best looking game I've ever seen, but it doesn't have any glaring weaknesses and looks much better than what the majority of the people in this thread cut it down to be.
I find it sad that a few of you think Pikmin 3 looks better than Viva Pinata. Have you all never played that game? The fur shading and the individual blades of grass? The animation? Way ahead of Pikmin 3. Way ahead.
People like me?... :| You mean a gamer who isn't so desperately lost in denial that he can't seem to admit that every NEW console that come out has had games that are better looking than what's already out when launched?[QUOTE="Grey_Eyed_Elf"][QUOTE="umcommon"] .... Nintendo could pump out photo realistic graphics and people like you would still rip them apart. It's Nintendo's first graphical ambition with the hardware, games will only look better on it as time goes on.
umcommon
Please give me actual proof of games that look noticeably better than Pikmin 3. Because Max Payne and Gears 3 don't look as good and I consider them impressive. I honestly fail to see what's so "underwelming" about Pikmin 3. Maybe it's just a matter of taste or the fact that everyone on this board is glued to their M rated-only 360 library, but I think the game looks impressive... Maybe not the best looking game I've ever seen, but it doesn't have any glaring weaknesses and looks much better than what the majority of the people in this thread cut it down to be.
You expect him too after you make such an ignorant statement? You think Pikmin 3 looks better than Max Payne 3 and Gears 3? You are **** stupid. There is nothing else to really say. This is perhaps the biggest fanboy war cry I have ever seen in this forum. Dumb dumb dumb dumb. Go watch todays invisible walls. They will explain to you just how worthless Nintendo's press conference was.......[QUOTE="umcommon"].... Nintendo could pump out photo realistic graphics and people like you would still rip them apart. It's Nintendo's first graphical ambition with the hardware, games will only look better on it as time goes on. There is the problem. They do not have anything in their catalog where those realistic graphics fit. The Zelda demo looked great but Nintendo will still have him talking like a 3 month old with a carrot stuck up his ass. Metroid will keep getting fished off to another developer. Nintendo can only do one thing. Characters like Mario and Pikmin. Little cartoon characters that they have milked for decades. And even those have been passed up. Mario cannot hold a candle to the new Rayman or Retro's Donkey Kong Country. Evev trying to play Zelda after something like Skyrim is a laugh. Nintendo had its games have been passed by. I have Skyrim, think its a great game and didn't think anything less of Zelda TP after playing it. I'm sorry if your too im-"mature" to try a game that's not M rated. A game doesn't have to be a blood bath to be good.[QUOTE="Grey_Eyed_Elf"] I see... you mean when you compared Picmin 3 to Max Payne 3 and Gear's of War 3. Seems like I'm the one that wasted my time.WarTornRuston
[QUOTE="umcommon"]
[QUOTE="Grey_Eyed_Elf"] People like me?... :| You mean a gamer who isn't so desperately lost in denial that he can't seem to admit that every NEW console that come out has had games that are better looking than what's already out when launched?WarTornRuston
Please give me actual proof of games that look noticeably better than Pikmin 3. Because Max Payne and Gears 3 don't look as good and I consider them impressive. I honestly fail to see what's so "underwelming" about Pikmin 3. Maybe it's just a matter of taste or the fact that everyone on this board is glued to their M rated-only 360 library, but I think the game looks impressive... Maybe not the best looking game I've ever seen, but it doesn't have any glaring weaknesses and looks much better than what the majority of the people in this thread cut it down to be.
You expect him too after you make such an ignorant statement? You think Pikmin 3 looks better than Max Payne 3 and Gears 3? You are **** stupid. There is nothing else to really say. This is perhaps the biggest fanboy war cry I have ever seen in this forum. Dumb dumb dumb dumb. Go watch todays invisible walls. They will explain to you just how worthless Nintendo's press conference was....... The shading, lighting, geometry, and polygon count look better genius. Oh I forgot... you'd only like Pikmin if it was violent, how silly of me.Man that just makes me think about something. The Zelda demo last year. Everything they showed this year looks worse then last year's Zelda demo. What a fvcking joke.22ToothpicksTechnology demo's are NEVER indicative of real game play and also the Wii's hardware wasn't even being manufactured when they showed that at e3 last year so it was impossible that anything shown last year was running real time on the wii u because the wii u hardware wise didn't exsist,the chips i mean.
[QUOTE="WarTornRuston"]You expect him too after you make such an ignorant statement? You think Pikmin 3 looks better than Max Payne 3 and Gears 3? You are **** stupid. There is nothing else to really say. This is perhaps the biggest fanboy war cry I have ever seen in this forum. Dumb dumb dumb dumb. Go watch todays invisible walls. They will explain to you just how worthless Nintendo's press conference was....... The shading, lighting, geometry, and polygon count look better genius. Oh I forgot... you'd only like Pikmin if it was violent, how silly of me. I never said you were silly. Silly is how 11 year old girls act at sleep overs. Silly is how 4 year old kids act when they want attention. You are stupid. There is a big difference.[QUOTE="umcommon"]
Please give me actual proof of games that look noticeably better than Pikmin 3. Because Max Payne and Gears 3 don't look as good and I consider them impressive. I honestly fail to see what's so "underwelming" about Pikmin 3. Maybe it's just a matter of taste or the fact that everyone on this board is glued to their M rated-only 360 library, but I think the game looks impressive... Maybe not the best looking game I've ever seen, but it doesn't have any glaring weaknesses and looks much better than what the majority of the people in this thread cut it down to be.
umcommon
[QUOTE="22Toothpicks"]Man that just makes me think about something. The Zelda demo last year. Everything they showed this year looks worse then last year's Zelda demo. What a fvcking joke.blacktornTechnology demo's are NEVER indicative of real game play and also the Wii's hardware wasn't even being manufactured when they showed that at e3 last year so it was impossible that anything shown last year was running real time on the wii u because the wii u hardware wise didn't exsist,the chips i mean. You seem to forget Nintendo's trend of Zelda demos. The finally game usually blows the tech demos out of the water.
[QUOTE="umcommon"][QUOTE="WarTornRuston"] You expect him too after you make such an ignorant statement? You think Pikmin 3 looks better than Max Payne 3 and Gears 3? You are **** stupid. There is nothing else to really say. This is perhaps the biggest fanboy war cry I have ever seen in this forum. Dumb dumb dumb dumb. Go watch todays invisible walls. They will explain to you just how worthless Nintendo's press conference was.......WarTornRustonThe shading, lighting, geometry, and polygon count look better genius. Oh I forgot... you'd only like Pikmin if it was violent, how silly of me. I never said you were silly. Silly is how 11 year old girls act at sleep overs. Silly is how 4 year old kids act when they want attention. You are stupid. There is a big difference. In any case despite you posting a game that you think looks better it doesn't changed the fact that the wii u is more powerful than the 360 and ps3 as many devs have already said,so no point in arguing against some screenshots of different games,the wii u is more powerful.
Where I feel sorry for those who have to worry about other people's gaming tastes. :|Good Lord Sheep really are blind by the fanboy goo in their eyes. Pikmin looks like a HD N64 title at best. I really feel sorry for people who oly buy Nintendo systems.
WarTornRuston
[QUOTE="WarTornRuston"][QUOTE="umcommon"] The shading, lighting, geometry, and polygon count look better genius. Oh I forgot... you'd only like Pikmin if it was violent, how silly of me.blacktornI never said you were silly. Silly is how 11 year old girls act at sleep overs. Silly is how 4 year old kids act when they want attention. You are stupid. There is a big difference. In any case despite you posting a game that you think looks better it doesn't changed the fact that the wii u is more powerful than the 360 and ps3 as many devs have already said,so no point in arguing against some screenshots of different games,the wii u is more powerful.
"One of the developers on-hand told me theWii Uhardware appears to be "better in some areas" compared toXbox 360andPlayStation 3"
"The developer did not expect the final version to be much different, and silencing any discussion about the game having a faster frame rate on Wii U."
In any case despite you posting a game that you think looks better it doesn't changed the fact that the wii u is more powerful than the 360 and ps3 as many devs have already said,so no point in arguing against some screenshots of different games,the wii u is more powerful.[QUOTE="blacktorn"][QUOTE="WarTornRuston"] I never said you were silly. Silly is how 11 year old girls act at sleep overs. Silly is how 4 year old kids act when they want attention. You are stupid. There is a big difference. Grey_Eyed_Elf
"One of the developers on-hand told me theWii Uhardware appears to be "better in some areas" compared toXbox 360andPlayStation 3"
"The developer did not expect the final version to be much different, and silencing any discussion about the game having a faster frame rate on Wii U."
I wasn't aware that Pikmin was striving for the same art style as that zelda demo :?Not seeing anything shown that looks like or even close to that zelda demo.
Nintendo pulling a sony?
MFDOOM1983
Nah bro, teh geometry, tessellation, texture filtering, lighting, skyboxes etc. are all better.What we have already and what has been out before... looks better.
From Banjo and Kazooie, to Little Big Planet, to Rayman and Rachet and Clank... etcg0ddyX
Sheep are now experts on graphics.:P
[QUOTE="Voyant"]I will say this...its looks MUCH better than any of the launch titles the 360 and the PS3 had.....I will give it that.topgunmv
Kameo.
Don't forget PGR3, Quake 4, Need for Speed Most Wanted and Call of Duty 2. Whats more important is that those games looked better than PS2,XBOX and NGC games... the WIiU tittles do not look better than 360 and PS3 games. Just the Wii's.I don't know why anyone thinks pikmin 3 is mind blowing graphically. Its not bad, but it is nothing spectacular. Spectacular is The Last of Us, Assassins Creed 3, and Watch Dogs.
[QUOTE="MFDOOM1983"]Not seeing anything shown that looks like or even close to that zelda demo.I wasn't aware that Pikmin was striving for the same art style as that zelda demo :?art style =/= graphical fidelityNintendo pulling a sony?
Shinobishyguy
That zelda demo looks on par with some of the top looking games on consoles this gen. Everything shown running on wii-u at this e3 looks 2-3 years old at best.
[QUOTE="topgunmv"][QUOTE="Voyant"]I will say this...its looks MUCH better than any of the launch titles the 360 and the PS3 had.....I will give it that.Grey_Eyed_Elf
Kameo.
Don't forget PGR3, Quake 4, Need for Speed Most Wanted and Call of Duty 2. Whats more important is that those games looked better than PS2,XBOX and NGC games... the WIiU tittles do not look better than 360 and PS3 games. Just the Wii's. I'd put pgr3 and dead or alive 4 up there as well.By the time Wii U games start looking better than the top current Gen games
PS4 and the next Xbox would be out ( True next gen consoles) and will blow out the Wii u.
sheep are so use to crappy graphics that they are gawking over these hahahahastereointegrityAnother perk of being a sheep is that I'm used to games that, even if they aren't overly beautiful, play like a dream and are a ton of fun. Which, by the way, is what gaming is about.
People really dont get just how awesome Pikmin 3 looks The photorealistic style is VERY well done, i cant believe how many people actually think its the same from Pikmin 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WxWIvaD2XQI
you guys say you "seen better" but the gaming realistic graphics today fall short compared REAL LIFE, which is what this game is implying with the Photorealistic style(its not being the colorful realistic style of Viva Pinata, its a REAL LIFE simulator, seriously LOOK at the trailer and tell me it doesnt look like your looking at nature with a Magnifying glass). I hope you guys KNOW what Photorealistic means, Realistic has its own way in gaming but this is different, its not the gaming realistic you guys come to know and love to always see.
There's ALLOT of graphical styles and it saddens me how you dont realize the photorealistic type. I do admit some parts came from Wii but it still looks great, miyamoto still got time, im already sold on the visuals, MUCH better than Pikmin 2. I guess its getting so much backlash because Nintendo likes mixing Realistic with Cartoonish and well, there's you guys who dont think Cartoonish graphics can evolve -_-
And that pic, holy sh*t i thought the Pikmin were shiny and looked like real fruit in the concept art but DAMN they still keep that shiny look 0_0
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment