Why does Nintendo insist on creating new home consoles?

  • 99 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for emgesp
emgesp

7848

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By emgesp
Member since 2004 • 7848 Posts

Most of you know Nintendo has seen declining home console hardware sales since the SNES, with the original Wii being an outlier. The Wii U should have been the end of their home console division if you ask me. IMHO, they should just stick to handhelds for as long as they can.

Think about it. The Wii U has been on the market for over 2.5 yrs and has only recently managed to sell 10 million units with some of the biggest Nintendo franchises already getting released on the console. There is nothing they can do to reverse the declining sales trend unless somehow they create another gimmick that will attract casuals again.

People just don't care about Nintendo home consoles anymore and I guess its gonna take another failure for them to get the message. So, if the NX doesn't sell any better than the Wii U, will you then agree that Nintendo should just stop making home consoles for good?

Sony pulled out of the handheld market after the Vita tanked, so why doesn't Nintendo do the same when it comes to their home consoles?

Avatar image for Heil68
Heil68

60713

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 Heil68
Member since 2004 • 60713 Posts

They make money. When they don't, then maybe then they'll pull out of consoles.

Avatar image for Ant_17
Ant_17

13634

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#3  Edited By Ant_17
Member since 2005 • 13634 Posts

I think the problem is that they are always first out the gate.

This is one time where coming in 1st is a bad thing.

They are starting gen 9 in maybe a year and the curent consoles are bare naked.

I say wait , see what the competion is bringing , then show us what you got.

And i know that being last is a bigger risk , but since the Gamecube , they always try to be 1st with the tech.

It worked for the DS and WII , not so much for the 3DS and WIIU.

Avatar image for emgesp
emgesp

7848

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4  Edited By emgesp
Member since 2004 • 7848 Posts

@Heil68 said:

They make money. When they don't, then maybe then they'll pull out of consoles.

So Nintendo can keep releasing consoles that only sell 10 - 15 million units and still make enough profit to keep their home console hardware division alive?

Avatar image for GameboyTroy
GameboyTroy

9729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 1

#5  Edited By GameboyTroy
Member since 2011 • 9729 Posts

Oh be quiet. You don't know what they are going to do.

http://venturebeat.com/2015/07/16/more-hints-that-amd-is-building-nintendo-nxs-processor/

We’re guessing that AMD will supply the main processor for the upcoming Nintendo machine. That’s not too much of a leap of faith, as AMD already supplies the chips for Wii U, Sony’s PlayStation 4, and Microsoft’s Xbox One. It’s an important chip project, as the processor is key to whether Nintendo’s next machine will be competitive and affordable. And for AMD, which has reported losses for a couple of quarters, it could be a safe haven for bruising competition with Intel.

Nintendo could make the leap from IBM’s PowerPC to x86-based (AMD and Intel) architecture. It would make sense for Nintendo to continue its relationship with AMD (which makes the graphics chip for the Wii U) and switch to use x86 architecture in its next-generation design, which Nintendo announced would be called the NX.

AMD classifies its game console chips as “semi-custom.” These “accelerated processing unit” (APU) chips combine a central processing unit (CPU) and graphics processing unit (GPU) on a single chip. Intel makes such chips as well, but AMD had an edge in the previous generation of consoles because it focused much more on the graphics side of the chip. AMD successfully sold custom versions of its APUs to Microsoft and Sony. AMD succeeded with the argument that it could cut out one chip from the system with its combo chip design.

Avatar image for Heil68
Heil68

60713

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 Heil68
Member since 2004 • 60713 Posts

@emgesp said:
@Heil68 said:

They make money. When they don't, then maybe then they'll pull out of consoles.

So Nintendo can keep releasing consoles that only sell 10 - 15 million units and still make enough profit to keep their home console hardware division alive?

Simply yes. Do you think they would if they were loosing money?

Avatar image for iambatman7986
iambatman7986

4575

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#7 iambatman7986
Member since 2013 • 4575 Posts

@Ant_17: I can't think of the last time they were 1st out the gate besides the Wii U.

PS2 and Dreamcast released before the Xbox and GC and I feel like the Xbox released a week earlier than the GC.

Saturn and PS1 released before the N64

360 launched before PS3 and Wii.

Genesis was out before the SNES

NES was out before the master system but Sega launched the Mark 1000 the same day as the NES in Japan so this one is up in the air.

OT, they don't stop making home consoles because they think they can still win their core fans back and who am I to say they can't. They just need to get with the times a bit and I know a bunch of people would be right back on their bandwagon. Also, you don't need to finish first to be successful.

Avatar image for a-new-guardian
A-new-Guardian

2458

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8  Edited By A-new-Guardian
Member since 2015 • 2458 Posts

While it would be more convenient for me if they went third party I still think they should make their own console. competition is good, and we the consumer get the benefit from it. they are losing though and the late Iwata had to cut from his own salary so that none would be fired last year and I respect them for that.

Maybe they should try to listen more so they could profit. listen to third party developers and to your fans Nintendo. that's all I have to say on this matter.

Avatar image for Ant_17
Ant_17

13634

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#9 Ant_17
Member since 2005 • 13634 Posts

@iambatman7986 said:

@Ant_17: I can't think of the last time they were 1st out the gate besides the Wii U.

PS2 and Dreamcast released before the Xbox and GC and I feel like the Xbox released a week earlier than the GC.

Saturn and PS1 released before the N64

360 launched before PS3 and Wii.

Genesis was out before the SNES

NES was out before the master system but Sega launched the Mark 1000 the same day as the NES in Japan so this one is up in the air.

OT, they don't stop making home consoles because they think they can still win their core fans back and who am I to say they can't. They just need to get with the times a bit and I know a bunch of people would be right back on their bandwagon. Also, you don't need to finish first to be successful.

Really , the Wii lanched after the 360?

But the DS came out before the psp , same as the 3ds and the Vita.

I guess it really is lack of interest thats killing Nintendo.

Avatar image for emgesp
emgesp

7848

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 emgesp
Member since 2004 • 7848 Posts

@GameboyTroy said:

Oh be quiet. You don't know what they are going to do.

http://venturebeat.com/2015/07/16/more-hints-that-amd-is-building-nintendo-nxs-processor/

We’re guessing that AMD will supply the main processor for the upcoming Nintendo machine. That’s not too much of a leap of faith, as AMD already supplies the chips for Wii U, Sony’s PlayStation 4, and Microsoft’s Xbox One. It’s an important chip project, as the processor is key to whether Nintendo’s next machine will be competitive and affordable. And for AMD, which has reported losses for a couple of quarters, it could be a safe haven for bruising competition with Intel.

Nintendo could make the leap from IBM’s PowerPC to x86-based (AMD and Intel) architecture. It would make sense for Nintendo to continue its relationship with AMD (which makes the graphics chip for the Wii U) and switch to use x86 architecture in its next-generation design, which Nintendo announced would be called the NX.

AMD classifies its game console chips as “semi-custom.” These “accelerated processing unit” (APU) chips combine a central processing unit (CPU) and graphics processing unit (GPU) on a single chip. Intel makes such chips as well, but AMD had an edge in the previous generation of consoles because it focused much more on the graphics side of the chip. AMD successfully sold custom versions of its APUs to Microsoft and Sony. AMD succeeded with the argument that it could cut out one chip from the system with its combo chip design.

We know the NX isn't simply one form factor. It is Nintendo's answer to Apple's IOS. Iwata basically confirmed this earlier this year.

Avatar image for emgesp
emgesp

7848

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 emgesp
Member since 2004 • 7848 Posts

@Heil68 said:
@emgesp said:
@Heil68 said:

They make money. When they don't, then maybe then they'll pull out of consoles.

So Nintendo can keep releasing consoles that only sell 10 - 15 million units and still make enough profit to keep their home console hardware division alive?

Simply yes. Do you think they would if they were loosing money?

Actually I do. I think they are too proud to give up.

Avatar image for TigerSuperman
TigerSuperman

4331

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#12  Edited By TigerSuperman
Member since 2013 • 4331 Posts

@emgesp said:
@Heil68 said:

They make money. When they don't, then maybe then they'll pull out of consoles.

So Nintendo can keep releasing consoles that only sell 10 - 15 million units and still make enough profit to keep their home console hardware division alive?

If their portable division can cover the losses, which they can't. Wii U is only barely alive because they haven't dropped the price so the 10's of people buying it gives Nintendo money. Will they do a price drop this year outside of BF deals? Probably not.

Avatar image for notorious1234na
Notorious1234NA

1917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#13 Notorious1234NA
Member since 2014 • 1917 Posts

No still some value for the company

Nintendo covers 21% of the market be stupid to give that up

Avatar image for TigerSuperman
TigerSuperman

4331

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#14 TigerSuperman
Member since 2013 • 4331 Posts

@iambatman7986 said:

@Ant_17: I can't think of the last time they were 1st out the gate besides the Wii U.

PS2 and Dreamcast released before the Xbox and GC and I feel like the Xbox released a week earlier than the GC.

Saturn and PS1 released before the N64

360 launched before PS3 and Wii.

Genesis was out before the SNES

NES was out before the master system but Sega launched the Mark 1000 the same day as the NES in Japan so this one is up in the air.

OT, they don't stop making home consoles because they think they can still win their core fans back and who am I to say they can't. They just need to get with the times a bit and I know a bunch of people would be right back on their bandwagon. Also, you don't need to finish first to be successful.

This is all over the place.

If we are talking nationwide American release dates, than NES/SMS/7800 released the same day, If you're talking Japanese release date than the Master system doesn't count. Because that was 2 years after the Sg/Famicom release.

Avatar image for emgesp
emgesp

7848

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15  Edited By emgesp
Member since 2004 • 7848 Posts

@TigerSuperman said:
@emgesp said:
@Heil68 said:

They make money. When they don't, then maybe then they'll pull out of consoles.

So Nintendo can keep releasing consoles that only sell 10 - 15 million units and still make enough profit to keep their home console hardware division alive?

If their portable division can cover the losses, which they can't. Wii U is only barely alive because they haven't dropped the price so the 10's of people buying it gives Nintendo money. Will they do a price drop this year outside of BF deals? Probably not.

The fact they still haven't dropped the price significantly is a head scratcher. They have a ton of stock just sitting on store shelves and instead of dropping the price to move more units they would rather just have them be dust collectors.

Avatar image for iambatman7986
iambatman7986

4575

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#16 iambatman7986
Member since 2013 • 4575 Posts

@TigerSuperman: Yeah it's hard to say unless a region is selected, but I just don't think releasing 1st is a big issue for Nintendo, I think it is the outdated way of thinking while MS and Sony are delivering what gamers want these days. Nintendo could get it back, they just need to do something to make people say "Oh shit, Nintendo is back" and people will eat it up. Look at the PS4, there isn't really a big reason it is selling as well as it is (exclusive games wise), but hype has it moving units like crazy. Oh and Nintendo needs to stop with the idiotic names for their consoles. The Wii U was a debacle from day 1.

Avatar image for GreySeal9
GreySeal9

28247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#17 GreySeal9
Member since 2010 • 28247 Posts

They had an enormously successful console last gen, so it's pretty ridiculous to suggest that they should stop making home consoles. I know you're going to come back with "it was an outlier" or "teh casuals" but those are not good arguments.

Avatar image for drummerdave9099
drummerdave9099

4606

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 drummerdave9099
Member since 2010 • 4606 Posts

They still see it as a profitable business, and they still have plenty of money

Avatar image for TigerSuperman
TigerSuperman

4331

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#19 TigerSuperman
Member since 2013 • 4331 Posts

@GreySeal9 said:

They had an enormously successful console last gen, so it's pretty ridiculous to suggest that they should stop making home consoles. I know you're going to come back with "it was an outlier" or "teh casuals" but those are not good arguments.

Well casuals is a good argument for the success part of their last console. It clearly isn't working for them now. However I have no opinion on them continuing or not on making consoles.

@emgesp said:
@TigerSuperman said:
@emgesp said:
@Heil68 said:

They make money. When they don't, then maybe then they'll pull out of consoles.

So Nintendo can keep releasing consoles that only sell 10 - 15 million units and still make enough profit to keep their home console hardware division alive?

If their portable division can cover the losses, which they can't. Wii U is only barely alive because they haven't dropped the price so the 10's of people buying it gives Nintendo money. Will they do a price drop this year outside of BF deals? Probably not.

The fact they still haven't dropped the price significantly is a head scratcher. They have a ton of stock just sitting on store shelves and instead of dropping the price to move more units they would rather just have them be dust collectors.

Because they would instantly take a loss, which they won't do, but it may be necessary for a good marketshare transfer tot he new console.

Avatar image for nintendoboy16
nintendoboy16

41533

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 14

#20 nintendoboy16
Member since 2007 • 41533 Posts

"Sony pulled out of the handheld market when the Vita tanked,"

When? Because there is a difference between dropping one system and leaving a part of the market entirely. I have never heard Sony say they are done with handhelds.

Besides that, why the hell shouldn't they? God forbid they have their own areas for their game development and have a place where fans accept them. I'm SURE they will be right at home on the other systems mainly consisting of fanbases who LEFT them and/or doesn't give a flying f*** about them (and there is straight up irony in cows and herms asking them to go third party). Worth noting is that they are struggling in their relevancy, how will killing their hardware and making games for other platforms fix that?

Avatar image for osan0
osan0

17814

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#21 osan0
Member since 2004 • 17814 Posts

because they could land another wii or nes or snes. hell even N64 numbers would probably keep them ticking over. they dont have to be no.1 in the market to make it worth their time..they just have to make it profitable.

getting out of the console market is a very big decision because once your out, your out so if you can make it work then stay in.

the wiiu is a cluster*BEEP*. i know it, you know, nintendo knows it, eddie knows it (have a crack at that reference :P)....its a disaster. there is no metric anyone can use to call it a success really (yeah exclusive games...but most sell badly and they aint selling many consoles. limited appeal). it was a badly thought through, overly complicated and ill concieved mess.

nintendo will dust themselves down, wipe ther bloody nose and take another crack at it. maybe, with the NX, they will land another hit.

Avatar image for emgesp
emgesp

7848

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22  Edited By emgesp
Member since 2004 • 7848 Posts
Loading Video...

I couldn't agree more with what this guy said in this video. I think he nailed it 100%.

There is a very good chance the NX home console will fail if Nintendo continues on the same path.

Avatar image for bobrossperm
BobRossPerm

2886

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23  Edited By BobRossPerm
Member since 2015 • 2886 Posts
@GreySeal9 said:

They had an enormously successful console last gen, so it's pretty ridiculous to suggest that they should stop making home consoles. I know you're going to come back with "it was an outlier" or "teh casuals" but those are not good arguments.

So what is a good argument for the Wii's success?

Avatar image for Jag85
Jag85

19543

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 219

User Lists: 0

#24 Jag85
Member since 2005 • 19543 Posts

We can't be too sure if the NX really will be a home console. It could be some kind of handheld-console-tablet hybrid, for all we know.

Avatar image for nintendoboy16
nintendoboy16

41533

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 14

#25 nintendoboy16
Member since 2007 • 41533 Posts

You're using a video of one of the most infamous cows, who cares about as much about Nintendo as DSP does, and was driven out of System Wars... just saying.

Avatar image for bunchanumbers
bunchanumbers

5709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#26 bunchanumbers
Member since 2013 • 5709 Posts

Sony has confirmed that they will never make a handheld again?

Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#27 Bread_or_Decide
Member since 2007 • 29761 Posts

If I don't like something no one else is allowed to like it. It should die and be unavailable to others.

Because only what I enjoy is important.

Avatar image for Demonjoe93
Demonjoe93

9869

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 107

User Lists: 0

#28 Demonjoe93
Member since 2009 • 9869 Posts

@nintendoboy16 said:

You're using a video of one of the most infamous cows, who cares about as much about Nintendo as DSP does, and was driven out of System Wars... just saying.

I like how I didn't even had to check the user name to know who you're talking about.

Arbitor365's montage thread will never be removed from SW's history.

Avatar image for Shinobishyguy
Shinobishyguy

22928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#29 Shinobishyguy
Member since 2006 • 22928 Posts

@nintendoboy16: holy shit is that really the same arbitor?

Avatar image for emgesp
emgesp

7848

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30  Edited By emgesp
Member since 2004 • 7848 Posts

@Jag85 said:

We can't be too sure if the NX really will be a home console. It could be some kind of handheld-console-tablet hybrid, for all we know.

Iwata confirmed it wasn't a hybrid. It will be a range of products from home consoles, handhelds and possibly other form factors.

Avatar image for emgesp
emgesp

7848

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 emgesp
Member since 2004 • 7848 Posts

@nintendoboy16 said:

You're using a video of one of the most infamous cows, who cares about as much about Nintendo as DSP does, and was driven out of System Wars... just saying.

Doesn't change the fact that what he said in the video is reasonable. He made good points that I think most would agree with. If Nintendo fails to change then they will eventually become utterly irrelevant.

Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#32 Bread_or_Decide
Member since 2007 • 29761 Posts

@emgesp said:
@nintendoboy16 said:

You're using a video of one of the most infamous cows, who cares about as much about Nintendo as DSP does, and was driven out of System Wars... just saying.

Doesn't change the fact that what he said in the video is reasonable. He made good points that I think most would agree with. If Nintendo fails to change then they will eventually become utterly irrelevant.

Gamers and fanboys don't know jack shit about anything. Telling Nintendo how to run their business is laughable.

Avatar image for Jag85
Jag85

19543

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 219

User Lists: 0

#33 Jag85
Member since 2005 • 19543 Posts

@emgesp said:

Iwata confirmed it wasn't a hybrid. It will be a range of products from home consoles, handhelds and possibly other form factors.

So basically, a unified architecture of some kind.

Avatar image for nintendoboy16
nintendoboy16

41533

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 14

#34 nintendoboy16
Member since 2007 • 41533 Posts

@Shinobishyguy said:

@nintendoboy16: holy shit is that really the same arbitor?

Yep, found that out a while ago when Blab posted a video of him in a lounge.

Avatar image for emgesp
emgesp

7848

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 emgesp
Member since 2004 • 7848 Posts

@Jag85 said:
@emgesp said:

Iwata confirmed it wasn't a hybrid. It will be a range of products from home consoles, handhelds and possibly other form factors.

So basically, a unified architecture of some kind.

It is Nintendo's answer to Apple's iOS.

Avatar image for emgesp
emgesp

7848

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36  Edited By emgesp
Member since 2004 • 7848 Posts

@Bread_or_Decide said:
@emgesp said:
@nintendoboy16 said:

You're using a video of one of the most infamous cows, who cares about as much about Nintendo as DSP does, and was driven out of System Wars... just saying.

Doesn't change the fact that what he said in the video is reasonable. He made good points that I think most would agree with. If Nintendo fails to change then they will eventually become utterly irrelevant.

Gamers and fanboys don't know jack shit about anything. Telling Nintendo how to run their business is laughable.

More like giving constructive criticism. Sorry, but some of us want to see Nintendo actually improve as a company. If you don't see an issue with how Nintendo is being run currently then you are part of the problem.

Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#37  Edited By Bread_or_Decide
Member since 2007 • 29761 Posts

@emgesp said:
@Bread_or_Decide said:
@emgesp said:
@nintendoboy16 said:

You're using a video of one of the most infamous cows, who cares about as much about Nintendo as DSP does, and was driven out of System Wars... just saying.

Doesn't change the fact that what he said in the video is reasonable. He made good points that I think most would agree with. If Nintendo fails to change then they will eventually become utterly irrelevant.

Gamers and fanboys don't know jack shit about anything. Telling Nintendo how to run their business is laughable.

More like giving constructive criticism. Sorry, but some of us want to see Nintendo actually improve as a company. If you don't see an issue with how Nintendo is being run currently then you are part of the problem.

Because Nintendo watches youtube and reads forum comments. OKAY. Real constructive. I hope those who care so much are writing letters to Nintendo because the internet hole they're yelling into is not doing any good.

Avatar image for emgesp
emgesp

7848

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38  Edited By emgesp
Member since 2004 • 7848 Posts

@Bread_or_Decide said:
@emgesp said:
@Bread_or_Decide said:
@emgesp said:
@nintendoboy16 said:

You're using a video of one of the most infamous cows, who cares about as much about Nintendo as DSP does, and was driven out of System Wars... just saying.

Doesn't change the fact that what he said in the video is reasonable. He made good points that I think most would agree with. If Nintendo fails to change then they will eventually become utterly irrelevant.

Gamers and fanboys don't know jack shit about anything. Telling Nintendo how to run their business is laughable.

More like giving constructive criticism. Sorry, but some of us want to see Nintendo actually improve as a company. If you don't see an issue with how Nintendo is being run currently then you are part of the problem.

Because Nintendo watches youtube and reads forum comments. OKAY. Real constructive. I hope those who care so much are writing letters to Nintendo because the internet hole they're yelling into is not doing any good.

They are well aware of whenever a product of theirs gets an overwhelmingly negative reaction. Metroid Prime: Federation Force is one obvious example.

http://www.vg247.com/2015/07/01/reggie-no-sugar-coating-negative-reactions-to-metroid-prime-federation-force/

Avatar image for ladyblue
LadyBlue

4943

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 LadyBlue
Member since 2012 • 4943 Posts
@emgesp said:
@Jag85 said:
@emgesp said:

Iwata confirmed it wasn't a hybrid. It will be a range of products from home consoles, handhelds and possibly other form factors.

So basically, a unified architecture of some kind.

It is Nintendo's answer to Apple's iOS.

You mean attempt. No way they get near to ios level of cohesiveness, and functionality. Well, at least not on their first try.

Avatar image for deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
deactivated-57ad0e5285d73

21398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
Member since 2009 • 21398 Posts

@emgesp said:
@Heil68 said:

They make money. When they don't, then maybe then they'll pull out of consoles.

So Nintendo can keep releasing consoles that only sell 10 - 15 million units and still make enough profit to keep their home console hardware division alive?

Hardware division? You have access to where X and Y funds go? I'd bet its all interconnected.

Avatar image for emgesp
emgesp

7848

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 emgesp
Member since 2004 • 7848 Posts

@ladyblue said:
@emgesp said:
@Jag85 said:
@emgesp said:

Iwata confirmed it wasn't a hybrid. It will be a range of products from home consoles, handhelds and possibly other form factors.

So basically, a unified architecture of some kind.

It is Nintendo's answer to Apple's iOS.

You mean attempt. No way they get near to ios level of cohesiveness, and functionality. Well, at least not on their first try.

Not saying it will be a direct competitor, but a unified architecture/platform is what Nintendo clearly wants to pursue.

Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#42 Bread_or_Decide
Member since 2007 • 29761 Posts

@emgesp said:
@Bread_or_Decide said:
@emgesp said:
@Bread_or_Decide said:
@emgesp said:
@nintendoboy16 said:

You're using a video of one of the most infamous cows, who cares about as much about Nintendo as DSP does, and was driven out of System Wars... just saying.

Doesn't change the fact that what he said in the video is reasonable. He made good points that I think most would agree with. If Nintendo fails to change then they will eventually become utterly irrelevant.

Gamers and fanboys don't know jack shit about anything. Telling Nintendo how to run their business is laughable.

More like giving constructive criticism. Sorry, but some of us want to see Nintendo actually improve as a company. If you don't see an issue with how Nintendo is being run currently then you are part of the problem.

Because Nintendo watches youtube and reads forum comments. OKAY. Real constructive. I hope those who care so much are writing letters to Nintendo because the internet hole they're yelling into is not doing any good.

They are well aware of whenever a product of theirs gets an overwhelmingly negative reaction. Metroid Prime: Federation Force is one obvious example.

http://www.vg247.com/2015/07/01/reggie-no-sugar-coating-negative-reactions-to-metroid-prime-federation-force/

And Nintendo turned around, cancelled the game, and got started right away on that metroid game everyone's been asking for.

That happened, right?

Right?

Nope, they said wait and play it, you're overreacting you cry baby internet whiners who don't know what the hell you want anymore. We wouldn't have sold 100 million Wii's if we listened to your dumb asses trying to tell us what to make.

Avatar image for emgesp
emgesp

7848

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 emgesp
Member since 2004 • 7848 Posts

@Heirren said:
@emgesp said:
@Heil68 said:

They make money. When they don't, then maybe then they'll pull out of consoles.

So Nintendo can keep releasing consoles that only sell 10 - 15 million units and still make enough profit to keep their home console hardware division alive?

Hardware division? You have access to where X and Y funds go? I'd bet its all interconnected.

There has to be a point where they would make more money just releasing their games on as many platforms as possible. Sure, the NX is their first attempt at achieving that by having all their future hardware be able to play the same games, but if the hardware fails to sell well then what's the point?

Avatar image for deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
deactivated-57ad0e5285d73

21398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
Member since 2009 • 21398 Posts

@emgesp said:
@Heirren said:
@emgesp said:
@Heil68 said:

They make money. When they don't, then maybe then they'll pull out of consoles.

So Nintendo can keep releasing consoles that only sell 10 - 15 million units and still make enough profit to keep their home console hardware division alive?

Hardware division? You have access to where X and Y funds go? I'd bet its all interconnected.

There has to be a point where they would make more money just releasing their games on as many platforms as possible. Sure, the NX is their first attempt at achieving that by having all their future hardware be able to play the same games, but if the hardware fails to sell well then what's the point?

They're business doesn't work like that. The hardware and the way they price things gives them more R&D freedom, with schedules that don't pertain to other another party. Nintendo wouldn't work as a 3rd party. Too many schedules to hit, etc. What happens when a publisher asks them the time frame on X game and Nintendo says, "it has been put on hold, we're moving x and y ideas to this new concept". That sort of thing wouldn't fly between two partners. And you can't say "well nintendo could publish all their games" either. They could feasibly do so for a minute but every release would put the company at risk.

Avatar image for emgesp
emgesp

7848

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 emgesp
Member since 2004 • 7848 Posts

@Bread_or_Decide said:
@emgesp said:
@Bread_or_Decide said:
@emgesp said:
@Bread_or_Decide said:
@emgesp said:
@nintendoboy16 said:

You're using a video of one of the most infamous cows, who cares about as much about Nintendo as DSP does, and was driven out of System Wars... just saying.

Doesn't change the fact that what he said in the video is reasonable. He made good points that I think most would agree with. If Nintendo fails to change then they will eventually become utterly irrelevant.

Gamers and fanboys don't know jack shit about anything. Telling Nintendo how to run their business is laughable.

More like giving constructive criticism. Sorry, but some of us want to see Nintendo actually improve as a company. If you don't see an issue with how Nintendo is being run currently then you are part of the problem.

Because Nintendo watches youtube and reads forum comments. OKAY. Real constructive. I hope those who care so much are writing letters to Nintendo because the internet hole they're yelling into is not doing any good.

They are well aware of whenever a product of theirs gets an overwhelmingly negative reaction. Metroid Prime: Federation Force is one obvious example.

http://www.vg247.com/2015/07/01/reggie-no-sugar-coating-negative-reactions-to-metroid-prime-federation-force/

And Nintendo turned around, cancelled the game, and got started right away on that metroid game everyone's been asking for.

That happened, right?

Right?

Nope, they said wait and play it, you're overreacting you cry baby internet whiners who don't know what the hell you want anymore. We wouldn't have sold 100 million Wii's if we listened to your dumb asses trying to tell us what to make.

The Wii sold 100 million units because of casuals, not core gamers. The Wii's overall library sucks compared to the 360/PS3's library. There are some gems, but in general the Wii is loaded with shovelware and super casual garbage games.

Please, don't try and assume that I don't know what I really want from Nintendo anymore. I'm actually a huge Nintendo fan, been a fan for over 25 yrs when the NES was slaughtering the competition. I know exactly what I want from Nintendo, but it seems that they just don't care about the generation of gamers that supported them in the early years. All they care about it seems is creating unnecessary gimmicks and doing everything they can to regain that casual market they lost with the Wii U.

Avatar image for deactivated-58ce94803a170
deactivated-58ce94803a170

8822

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#46  Edited By deactivated-58ce94803a170
Member since 2015 • 8822 Posts

@emgesp said:
@Bread_or_Decide said:
@emgesp said:
@Bread_or_Decide said:
@emgesp said:
@Bread_or_Decide said:
@emgesp said:
@nintendoboy16 said:

You're using a video of one of the most infamous cows, who cares about as much about Nintendo as DSP does, and was driven out of System Wars... just saying.

Doesn't change the fact that what he said in the video is reasonable. He made good points that I think most would agree with. If Nintendo fails to change then they will eventually become utterly irrelevant.

Gamers and fanboys don't know jack shit about anything. Telling Nintendo how to run their business is laughable.

More like giving constructive criticism. Sorry, but some of us want to see Nintendo actually improve as a company. If you don't see an issue with how Nintendo is being run currently then you are part of the problem.

Because Nintendo watches youtube and reads forum comments. OKAY. Real constructive. I hope those who care so much are writing letters to Nintendo because the internet hole they're yelling into is not doing any good.

They are well aware of whenever a product of theirs gets an overwhelmingly negative reaction. Metroid Prime: Federation Force is one obvious example.

http://www.vg247.com/2015/07/01/reggie-no-sugar-coating-negative-reactions-to-metroid-prime-federation-force/

And Nintendo turned around, cancelled the game, and got started right away on that metroid game everyone's been asking for.

That happened, right?

Right?

Nope, they said wait and play it, you're overreacting you cry baby internet whiners who don't know what the hell you want anymore. We wouldn't have sold 100 million Wii's if we listened to your dumb asses trying to tell us what to make.

The Wii sold 100 million units because of casuals, not core gamers. The Wii's overall library sucks compared to the 360/PS3's library. There are some gems, but in general the Wii is loaded with shovelware and super casual garbage games.

Please, don't try and assume that I don't know what I really want from Nintendo anymore. I'm actually a huge Nintendo fan, been a fan for over 25 yrs when the NES was slaughtering the competition. I know exactly what I want from Nintendo, but it seems that they just don't care about the generation of gamers that supported them in the early years. All they care about it seems is creating unnecessary gimmicks and doing everything they can to regain that casual market they lost with the Wii U.

I enjoy my Wii library a whole lot more then my PS3 library. Its not even close for me. PS3 library was a major let down for me.

Seems gamers want Nintendo to be everything but Nintendo. Makes no sense to me. I love them just the way they are.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

178844

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 178844 Posts

Because they can. Why does it bother you?

Avatar image for GreySeal9
GreySeal9

28247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#48 GreySeal9
Member since 2010 • 28247 Posts

@bobrossperm said:
@GreySeal9 said:

They had an enormously successful console last gen, so it's pretty ridiculous to suggest that they should stop making home consoles. I know you're going to come back with "it was an outlier" or "teh casuals" but those are not good arguments.

So what is a good argument for the Wii's success?

I'm not saying that the Wii wasn't boosted due to casuals; I'm saying that the fact that it was fueled by casual is no argument for Nintendo not making home consoles anymore.

Avatar image for Dibdibdobdobo
Dibdibdobdobo

6683

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#49 Dibdibdobdobo
Member since 2008 • 6683 Posts

How do we know if we like specfic items on the market if not released?

Nintendos biggest fault this gen where.

1 hardware which was neither last gen or this.

Poor supply of games in the first year.

Controller should have been sold as a accessory rather than as part of the system.

concern over 3DS and its poor start to the gen moved support from the WiiU

Not ready for the HD transition

released to early against PS4 X1and to late for ps3 360.

Saying "Were going for core gamers" and failing from March 2013 as we had MH3U and nothing until sept which was W101.

confusion with the name and Gamepad.

poor marketing.

Avatar image for TrappedInABox91
TrappedInABox91

1483

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#50 TrappedInABox91
Member since 2013 • 1483 Posts

Because its what they do? They wouldn't be doing it if they didn't make money. Just because the Wii U did poorly doesn't mean "Game over" for Nintendo. *eye roll*