So I was looking at IGN (I know, I know, big mistake) and I saw this:
It's essentially some of the IGN guys debating why certain develops (Bethesda, because get real, nobody else gets a free pass for this) gets a free pass for releasing really buggy games that (in the case of Fallout 4) have game-breaking issues.
Bethesda is literally the only company that gets a free pass for this in this day and age, and yet people line up to apologize for them.
And since coming back to this forum today, I've seen a lot of this, I've seen it other places, too.
The fat guy on the left in the video is the prime example of a Bethesda apologist.
People saying, "Oh, but wait for the patches," or "Oh, it's not a big deal," or "Oh, wait 'till the mod community fixes it."
I'm sorry, but in this day and age, this immunity that Bethesda has is fucking pathetic.
Any other studio would be crucified for this.
Assassin's Creed Unity is a broken, buggy mess? "Ubisoft sucks. Kill everyone at Ubisoft Montreal!"
Never mind that that game was developed in a year by like six studios and rushed out the door.
Fallout: New Vegas is stupidly broken at launch? "**** Obsidian. Bethesda should have made this. How do you not QA test your shit?"
Nevermind that Obsidian got fucked on that publishing agreement by Bethesda.
Batman: Arkham Knight's PC version is horrendous? "**** Warner Bros. **** Rocksteady. DRIVE DOWN THEIR USER SCORE!" The game got pulled from Steam, for ****'s sake.
But if Bethesda, who has been releasing ugly, buggy, broken, badly-written games that play poorly for more than a decade does it again?
"It's fine, man. Why do you hate Bethesda? The modders will fix it. It'll get patched."
All it fucking takes is the Bethesda logo on the box and you people will throw your principles (games should work at launch, games should be complete at launch, games shouldn't need patches day 1) out the fucking window and go out of your way to apologize for a studio THAT HAS AS MUCH TIME AND MONEY AS IT WANTS TO DEVELOP VIDEO GAMES.
Think about that for a second.
"But DL," you'll say, "their games are so big and ambitious, and no one else does that."
Um... do you people live in the real world?
Metal Gear Solid V came out this year. Plays amazing. Has a huge world that you can do a ton of shit in. Runs nearly flawlessly.
Ditto for The Witcher 3, which has been made a BETTER game than when it released.
Ditto for Grand Theft Auto V. The list goes on and on and on, because pretty much every game these days is huge. And almost all of them look better, play better, and are less buggy than Bethesda's games.
And you KNOW that if any of those games I listed, or if any of the countless other open world games released in recent memory ran as badly as Fallout 4, those developers would be taken to task by critics and forum posters like there was no tomorrow.
But Bethesda? They're immune.
So, why? Why is it okay for this company to not live in 2015? Why is it okay for them to be worse than their contemporaries in nearly every fashion? Why is it okay for them, and only them, to release broken crap?
How about we hold them to the standards of the 21st century, like every other studio? Or this that too much too ask?
TL;DR Bethesda release broken trash and it's magically okay, while other developers get taken apart for it. Why is this okay? Why do people line up to apologize for broken mediocrity?
Log in to comment