Whic is a better investment: $400 AMD R9 290 vs $400 PS4?

  • 165 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Xtasy26
Xtasy26

5582

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 53

User Lists: 0

Edited By Xtasy26

Poll Whic is a better investment: $400 AMD R9 290 vs $400 PS4? (117 votes)

AMD R9 290 - Biggest game library, 1080P/60FPS, 1600P, 4K gaming + Steam for free 57%
PS4 - PS4 Exclusives, Some 1080P games, 900P/720P gaming + PSN for yearly fee 43%

On the eve, of PS4's launch, I think this would be an appropriate question. Since both pieces of hardware are priced the same. But one is vastly superior in hardware wise. Would you make the tradeoff?

AMD R9 290:

Specs:

VS

PS4:

Specs:

Note the R9 290 is 2.66 times more powerful. The R9 290 GPU is almost 5X more powerful than PS4's GPU.

Not, only that it doesn't struggle to run games with Ghost's at 1080P. The R9 290 will blow through Ghost at 1080P at constant 60+FPS not only that it could even push Ghost at 4K graphics. It's not only easily pushing 60 FPS + in 1080P in AAA titles but it's easily pushing 45+ FPS in 1600P in games like Crysis 3, Far Cry 3, Tomb Raider (with TressFX enabled), Metro: Last Night. Not only the PS4 not have the games mentioned it will choke trying to run Crysis 3, Far Cry 3, Tomb Raider with TressFX and Metro Last Night at 1080P. It could barely push BF4 at 900P something that the R9 290 can do at 1080P without breaking a sweat. And did I mention it can do 4K gaming.

The only advantage the PS4 that I could think of is that it has exclusives.

But over the next 5-6 years the R9 290 will still be pushing close to 1080P in certain games whereas the PS4 will likely dwindle down to 720P. Think about BF5 or BF6, which hardware will run better in the upcoming years.

Not to mention the R9 290 comes bundled with a free copy of BF4. PS4 doesn't come bundled with ANY games. And I didn't even go into 75% off of Steam Sales. I doubt the PSN will gave AAA games 75% off.

So, if you were to make a $400 investment which one would you choose?

 • 
Avatar image for Xtasy26
Xtasy26

5582

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 53

User Lists: 0

#151  Edited By Xtasy26
Member since 2008 • 5582 Posts

@AMD655 said:

@Xtasy26 said:

@AMD655 said:

@Xtasy26 said:

@AMD655 said:

Yes they upgraded their GPU's, none of them have mentioned what CPU they are using.

Your CPU is far too weak, i know this is a fruitless argument with you, as sense is not your strong point.

You see the FPS i was getting in that video? yours would be roughly 30-50FPS just because you neglect your PC with a old slow CPU.

A 290 does not stop hardware bottlenecks.

Again where did I say there won't be any bottlenecks? I have said that it won't reach it's true potential. I have seen guys with CPU's like mine that got great performance at 1080P and above. To say that there won't be any benefit is truly idiotic I will easily see a significant boost in framerates. And mind you I have my CPU overclocked. You clearly ignore people who have posted reviews on newegg that shows otherwise (as proof), who have weaker hardware than mine. I only showed one example, there are others. While you keep on claiming your argument about there will be "no benefit" or your PC "can't handle it" when multiple examples on the net of people upgrading from weaker hardware than mines have shown significant improvements.

No one on newegg has a CPU like yours.

Please post a single person with a weak CPU who added a 290, or even a GPU close to a 290.

Significant? the only improvement you will find is in games that are dated back to 2005 era, or are easy on PC hardware in the first place, and judging by your Steam library, you seem to steer clear of games requiring powerful components.

As i stated, post a single person who added a card like that to a Phenom II x3 or lower CPU.

Then, tell me they know what they are talking about.

I already posted the link earlier of people with Phenom II's upgrading to R2 290 that saw significant imporvements; Here it is again:

http://www.overclock.net/t/1436497/official-amd-r9-290x-290-owners-club/4960

I also have demanding games, it's just not on Steam, it's on my Origin account like Crysis 2, BF3, to name a few. There's also people who have upgraded to R9 GPU's on their Pheonom II on Youtube. My CPU is also overclocked, so that will alleviate some of the bottleneck issues.

But the main point that there won't be "any benefit" going from my HD 6970 to a R9 290 is simply ignorance of the highest order.

The 1 person who is has a Quad core at 4ghz, and 8GB of ram, yours is only 3 cores, with 4GB.

So? I am already pushing 3.5 Ghz+, can hit 4 ghz probably if I wanted to. And your 8GB of ram comment is moot as no game out now requires 8GB of RAM. Regardless it doesn't mean that I won't see "any benefit" like you claim. I will definitely see significant benefit as shown by people who have upgraded to the R9 290\X using their Phenom II.

Then later on when I have the money, I could upgrade to a Steamroller CPU, or an AMD CPU hopefully in the 20 - 22 nm range. If I upgrade now, this will hold me over till then.

Avatar image for Xtasy26
Xtasy26

5582

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 53

User Lists: 0

#152  Edited By Xtasy26
Member since 2008 • 5582 Posts

@GioVela2010 said:

The better investment would be in a high end 1080p Plasma.

Stop playing PC games on shitty little LCD monitors

Already did that, brought a high end Samsung 60" Plasma to do some 1080P gaming on the big screen. ;)

Avatar image for GioVela2010
GioVela2010

5566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#153 GioVela2010
Member since 2008 • 5566 Posts

@Xtasy26 said:

@GioVela2010 said:

The better investment would be in a high end 1080p Plasma.

Stop playing PC games on shitty little LCD monitors

Already did that, brought a high end Samsung 60" Plasma to do some 1080P gaming on the big screen. ;)

Nice! Which one

Avatar image for Xtasy26
Xtasy26

5582

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 53

User Lists: 0

#154 Xtasy26
Member since 2008 • 5582 Posts

@ronvalencia said:
@Xtasy26 said:

@psymon100 said:

"ASRock 780GXE MB AMD Phenom II X3 Black Editon (OC'ed 3.4 GHZ) XFX 2 GB HD 6950 BIOS FLASHED to HD 6970 (OC'ed 900 MHZ GPU 5.6 GHZ GDDR5 Memory) 4GB DDR2 Reaper RAM 120 GB Solid Stage HD 1 Terabyte HD Samsung DVD+/- RW Smilodon Raidmax Gaming Case PC Power & Cooling 610W PSU Windows 7 Ultimage 64 bit Samsung 23.3" HD 1080P LED monitor"

OK

In this case then, maybe stick with the gpu you have, it's no slouch, and go for the PS4.

Otherwise if you're unsure about ps4, I'd be thinking about a CPU upgrade, or maybe moving to socket 1150. i think amd655 is right, the potency of that r9 290 might be lost without a decent cpu to back it up.

You are right it's no slouch but in BF4 multiplayer, it drops below 30 FPS in certain cases. So, if I get a R9 290, I will easily be able to cross the 30 FPS threshold with no problems whatsoever.

From http://hardforum.com/showthread.php?p=1040392646

Some R9-290s are being unlock to full R9-290X i.e. it's another 6950 BIOS re-flash upgrade to 6970 scenario.

-----

According to GPU-Z's ASIC quality rating, my 7950 is rated 68.2 precent while my 7970 has 81 precent.

That's abosolutely insane. Since I did the 6950 BIOS flash to 6970, I am definitely thinking about pulling the trigger for the R9 290. If the flashing is successful the R9 290 will still hold it's value even after a year later. I remeber my BIOS flashed HD 6970 was still cheaper than "regualr" HD 6970's even after a year later.

And your "impulse" buy of the R9 290 was definitely an excellent buy. You won't regret it. :)

Avatar image for SageJMP
SageJMP

4210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#155  Edited By SageJMP
Member since 2004 • 4210 Posts

considering I would also have to replace my motherboard, cpu, and ram to get the most use out of a R9, it isn't really a "400 dollar" option for me.

Avatar image for Xtasy26
Xtasy26

5582

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 53

User Lists: 0

#157 Xtasy26
Member since 2008 • 5582 Posts

@ @ronvalencia Hey, were you able to BIOS flash your R9 290 to a R9 290X?

Your thread at HardFORUM as got me excited. If I could save $150 and successfully get a R9 290X on top a BF4 coupon, it's definitely worth it.

I am seriously considering it!

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#158  Edited By ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts
@Xtasy26 said:

@ @ronvalencia Hey, were you able to BIOS flash your R9 290 to a R9 290X?

Your thread at HardFORUM as got me excited. If I could save $150 and successfully get a R9 290X on top a BF4 coupon, it's definitely worth it.

I am seriously considering it!

For the UK market, one could buy pre-flashed R9-290_to_R9-290X from http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=GX-014-VX&groupid=701&catid=56&subcat=1752

I haven't re-flash my R9-290 to R9-290X.

My other 7970's ASIC quality is 81.1 precent and can overclock to 1.1Ghz without a voltage increase.

My decommissioned 7950's ASIC quality is 68 precent and needs voltage increase for 1Ghz operation and it's voltage and amps is higher than my other 7970.

Successful R9-290 to R9-290x is a lottery.

--------

Sapphire has announced performance boosting BIOS updated for it's existing R9-290.http://www.techpowerup.com/194909/sapphire-releases-performance-boost-for-r9-290.html

Avatar image for Xtasy26
Xtasy26

5582

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 53

User Lists: 0

#159  Edited By Xtasy26
Member since 2008 • 5582 Posts

@

@GioVela2010 said:

@Xtasy26 said:

@GioVela2010 said:

The better investment would be in a high end 1080p Plasma.

Stop playing PC games on shitty little LCD monitors

Already did that, brought a high end Samsung 60" Plasma to do some 1080P gaming on the big screen. ;)

Nice! Which one

Samsung PN60F5300 600Hz Plasma

http://www.bestbuy.com/site/samsung-60-class-59-9-10-diag--plasma-1080p-600hz-hdtv/8182045.p?id=1218864995544&skuId=8182045&ref=06&loc=01&ci_src=14110944&ci_sku=8182045&extensionType={adtype}:{network}&s_kwcid=PTC!pla!{keyword}!{matchtype}!{adwords_producttargetid}!{network}!{ifmobile:M}!{creative}&kpid=8182045&k_clickid=496a1502-365d-c188-3263-000023f83b0d&gclid=CNSHvo7_-boCFUMV7AodB18AMg

It will do for the price. Got a deal (cheaper than the link) and couldn't pass it up.

Tried ACII, looks gorgeous at 1080P with 8XAA and 16XAF. When you are playing games at large screen as mines, 720P vs 1080P does make a difference.

Nice suggestion BTW, with you suggesting to choose Plasma vs a projector for the best picture quality in my other thread. Eventhough Projector would be larger but the picture quality would be no where near as good. Not to mention I will have some ambient light during the day which will wash out some of the picture quality in a projector.

Avatar image for GioVela2010
GioVela2010

5566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#160 GioVela2010
Member since 2008 • 5566 Posts

@Xtasy26 said:

@

@GioVela2010 said:

@Xtasy26 said:

@GioVela2010 said:

The better investment would be in a high end 1080p Plasma.

Stop playing PC games on shitty little LCD monitors

Already did that, brought a high end Samsung 60" Plasma to do some 1080P gaming on the big screen. ;)

Nice! Which one

Samsung PN60F5300 600Hz Plasma

http://www.bestbuy.com/site/samsung-60-class-59-9-10-diag--plasma-1080p-600hz-hdtv/8182045.p?id=1218864995544&skuId=8182045&ref=06&loc=01&ci_src=14110944&ci_sku=8182045&extensionType={adtype}:{network}&s_kwcid=PTC!pla!{keyword}!{matchtype}!{adwords_producttargetid}!{network}!{ifmobile:M}!{creative}&kpid=8182045&k_clickid=496a1502-365d-c188-3263-000023f83b0d&gclid=CNSHvo7_-boCFUMV7AodB18AMg

It will do for the price. Got a deal (cheaper than the link) and couldn't pass it up.

Tried ACII, looks gorgeous at 1080P with 8XAA and 16XAF. When you are playing games at large screen as mines, 720P vs 1080P does make a difference.

Nice suggestion BTW, with you suggesting to choose Plasma vs a projector for the best picture quality in my other thread. Eventhough Projector would be larger but the picture quality would be no where near as good. Not to mention I will have some ambient light during the day which will wash out some of the picture quality in a projector.

Good choice. Glad i could help. I havent read any reviews of the F5300, but im glad it's working out. (I have the F8500 same size)

Avatar image for nicecall
nicecall

528

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#161 nicecall
Member since 2013 • 528 Posts

neithers a good investment. the AMD card is loud and will be useless in 2014 when the next line of nvidia cards comes out which are what you should be waiting for and investing in. I was tempted to buy a new video card but waiting for new architecture is smarter. both amd and nvidias cards are power hogs... wait a year and get some real next gen cards.

not sure why you would buy any console now either, just wait till some games come out on them, by then, console will be cheaper and you will actually have some fun games to play on them.

2014 is the year to buy new stuff, be patient

Avatar image for KillzoneSnake
KillzoneSnake

2761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 37

User Lists: 0

#162 KillzoneSnake
Member since 2012 • 2761 Posts

R9 290 cant do anything alone. You gotta dump much more $$$ to build your overpowered rig lol. And PS4 will still get the big games xD

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#163  Edited By ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts
@nicecall said:

neithers a good investment. the AMD card is loud and will be useless in 2014 when the next line of nvidia cards comes out which are what you should be waiting for and investing in. I was tempted to buy a new video card but waiting for new architecture is smarter. both amd and nvidias cards are power hogs... wait a year and get some real next gen cards.

not sure why you would buy any console now either, just wait till some games come out on them, by then, console will be cheaper and you will actually have some fun games to play on them.

2014 is the year to buy new stuff, be patient

Sorry, R9-290 fully supports DirectX 11.2 (Feature Level 11_1 + Tier 2) and Mantle which similar to PS4's graphics APIs.

The less future complaint GPU is NVIDIA Kepler which doesn't support DirectX 11.2 feature level 11_1 + Tier 2.

From http://www.galaxytech.com/__EN_GB__/Product2/ProductDetail?proID=488

GeForce 780 Ti has "Microsoft DirectX 11.2 API (feature level 11_0)" not with "Microsoft DirectX 11.2 API (feature level 11_1)".

Current AMD GCN fully supports Xbox One's "DirectX 11.X" which is a superset PC DirectX11.2. From http://blogs.windows.com/windows/b/appbuilder/archive/2013/10/14/raising-the-bar-with-direct3d.aspx

"The Xbox One graphics API is “Direct3D 11.x” and the Xbox One hardware provides a superset of Direct3D 11.2 functionality"

"We’re also working with our ISV and IHV partners on future efforts, including bringing the lightweight runtime and tooling capabilities of the Xbox One Direct3D implementation to Windows, and identifying the next generation of advanced 3D graphics technologies"

The next DirectX release would be based from Xbox One's "DirectX11.X" superset and AMD GCN is already runs this "DirectX 11.X" superset.

Microsoft gimped "DirectX 11.X" into PC's DirectX11.2 since Intel and NVIDIA doesn't support DirectX 11.X's superset features.

For $999 Titan or $699 780 Ti USD budget, I can buy year 2013 R9-290 and year 2014 R9-390 (AMD Pirate Islands). My H2-2013 R9-290 purchase fits within my fiscal income tax year (H2-2013 to H1-2014). The next fiscal H2 2014 to H1 2015 year is reset for another purchase.

Avatar image for Xtasy26
Xtasy26

5582

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 53

User Lists: 0

#164  Edited By Xtasy26
Member since 2008 • 5582 Posts

@GioVela2010 said:

@Xtasy26 said:

@

@GioVela2010 said:

@Xtasy26 said:

@GioVela2010 said:

The better investment would be in a high end 1080p Plasma.

Stop playing PC games on shitty little LCD monitors

Already did that, brought a high end Samsung 60" Plasma to do some 1080P gaming on the big screen. ;)

Nice! Which one

Samsung PN60F5300 600Hz Plasma

http://www.bestbuy.com/site/samsung-60-class-59-9-10-diag--plasma-1080p-600hz-hdtv/8182045.p?id=1218864995544&skuId=8182045&ref=06&loc=01&ci_src=14110944&ci_sku=8182045&extensionType={adtype}:{network}&s_kwcid=PTC!pla!{keyword}!{matchtype}!{adwords_producttargetid}!{network}!{ifmobile:M}!{creative}&kpid=8182045&k_clickid=496a1502-365d-c188-3263-000023f83b0d&gclid=CNSHvo7_-boCFUMV7AodB18AMg

It will do for the price. Got a deal (cheaper than the link) and couldn't pass it up.

Tried ACII, looks gorgeous at 1080P with 8XAA and 16XAF. When you are playing games at large screen as mines, 720P vs 1080P does make a difference.

Nice suggestion BTW, with you suggesting to choose Plasma vs a projector for the best picture quality in my other thread. Eventhough Projector would be larger but the picture quality would be no where near as good. Not to mention I will have some ambient light during the day which will wash out some of the picture quality in a projector.

Good choice. Glad i could help. I havent read any reviews of the F5300, but im glad it's working out. (I have the F8500 same size)

Nice! You have the really, really nice high end Plasma. Too bad I can't afford your model. Interesting story, I had initially ordered the Samsung 64" inch model the Samsung E533 because I wanted a larger size:

http://www.amazon.com/Samsung-PN64E533-64-Inch-1080p-Plasma/dp/B009ZGEYS4/ref=sr_1_1?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1385239949&sr=1-1&keywords=samsung+PN64E533

So, I ordered it online and when it came through the mail it had a huge gash that went through the box and it into the screen. So, the delivery company or whoever ruined a perfectly good brand new Samsung 64" (and if you look at the sticker, those things aren't cheap). It totally freaked me out when I saw it. Then I had to deal with a month long drama of getting my money back (which I finally got this Wednesday, although I have to wait for 5 days because it's waiting to be cleared). Needless to say I said screw it, I am done ordering big ticket items and large things like 60" Plasma's online. Not only you have to wait but it could come damaged through the mail. So I saw deal online and went to my local Best Buy store and they matched the online price of the 60" Samsung Plasma that I saw online and they came to my house and set it up. Didn't have to deal with the hassel of waiting and putting it together, not to mention the fear of having it come damaged. I don't think I will ever order something this huge and expensive online. I think you are better off ordering from your local retail store, especially, if they do price matching.

But it would have been nice to get the 64" but the extra $500 just for 4 more inches at the end I decided is not worth it. Not sure why just adding extra 4" cost's nearly $500 more when going from 50" to 60" isn't $500 more.

Avatar image for Xtasy26
Xtasy26

5582

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 53

User Lists: 0

#165  Edited By Xtasy26
Member since 2008 • 5582 Posts
@KillzoneSnake said:

R9 290 cant do anything alone. You gotta dump much more $$$ to build your overpowered rig lol. And PS4 will still get the big games xD

No, I don't need to dump much more $$$, I will just overclock my CPU more. I will instantly get boost in frame rates in games I need most like Crysis 3 and Metro Last Night. Then later on, I could shell out the dough to get a Steamroller CPU.

That's interesting @ronvalencia. Didn't realize that there are some retailers in the UK that would sell BIOS flashed R9 290 to R9 290X. I unfortunately don't have access to such retailers as I live in US. So, the only option that I would have to is to order from newegg and preferably get the XFX R9 290 (since they seem to be the one's with high success rate) and hope that it flashes.

@AMD655 Looks like you made a FOOL of yourself once more. More evidence that people with a Phenom II's are upgrading to a AMD R9 290 and getting significant boost in framerates. Straight from newegg of someone who brought a XFX R9 290 with a Phenom II 965 BE clocked at 3.4 GHZ:

Rating: 5/5Amazing Card

Pros: This card is amazing fast. I'm running Far Cry 3 and Batman: Origins @Ultra settings and 1900x1080 and haven't gone under 100 FPS (No OC).

Cons: None so far.

Other Thoughts: AMD Phenom 965 BE@3.4G Asus M479T-D OCZ 4G @1600MHZ XFX R9 290 WD Raptor 300G Antec 1200W PSU Antec 900x2 Case

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814150683

This just proves that your are an idiot when it comes to PC hardware. All this talk of getting "no benefit" on a Phenom II using a R9 290 or my PC can't handle a R9 290 is just BS. Doesn't surprise me coming from someone who is "clueless" about PC hardware.

@ronvalencia said:

For the UK market, one could buy pre-flashed R9-290_to_R9-290X fromhttp://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=GX-014-VX&groupid=701&catid=56&subcat=1752

I haven't re-flash my R9-290 to R9-290X.