Titanfall won't support split screen.

  • 129 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Suppaman100
Suppaman100

5250

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Suppaman100
Member since 2013 • 5250 Posts

https://twitter.com/Respawn/status/426866748608888832

Next-gen gaming is here!

Avatar image for inggrish
inggrish

10502

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#2 inggrish
Member since 2005 • 10502 Posts

For a game without a single player component this is awful.

A multiplayer only game without any split screen option.

Lems have no real local friends confirmed?

Avatar image for finalstar2007
finalstar2007

27952

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#3 finalstar2007
Member since 2008 • 27952 Posts

Man this game seem to get worse and worse, i was one of the first people to get truly excited for this game mainly because of the Call of Duty creators working on it but with all online only, bots with humans in online matches, no split-screen and others im starting to have second thoughts about this game.. was going to buy it day 1 on xbox360 but i may just hold off doing that till it hit half price later in the year.

Avatar image for MonsieurX
MonsieurX

39858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4  Edited By MonsieurX
Member since 2008 • 39858 Posts

inb4 cows circle jerk jelly

And maybe it will be bundled in a future DLC pack?

Avatar image for Shewgenja
Shewgenja

21456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 Shewgenja
Member since 2009 • 21456 Posts

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!

PC version the only way to go confirmed.

Avatar image for finalstar2007
finalstar2007

27952

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#6  Edited By finalstar2007
Member since 2008 • 27952 Posts

@_Matt_ said:

For a game without a single player component this is awful.

A multiplayer only game without any split screen option.

Lems have no real local friends confirmed?

Whats worse is that it will retail for full $60 :/

should be a $30 game at this point.

Avatar image for Suppaman100
Suppaman100

5250

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Suppaman100
Member since 2013 • 5250 Posts

Well I guess it won't be a problem for lemmings since they don't have any friends in real life.

Avatar image for Demonjoe93
Demonjoe93

9869

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 107

User Lists: 0

#8 Demonjoe93
Member since 2009 • 9869 Posts

Is this the kind of game that would be any good split-screen though?

Avatar image for stereointegrity
stereointegrity

12151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 stereointegrity
Member since 2007 • 12151 Posts

I loved split screen in the ps2 era but bow in the era of online gaming is split screen still needed?

Avatar image for Suppaman100
Suppaman100

5250

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Suppaman100
Member since 2013 • 5250 Posts

@stereointegrity said:

I loved split screen in the ps2 era but bow in the era of online gaming is split screen still needed?

If you have friends then yes.

Avatar image for inggrish
inggrish

10502

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#11 inggrish
Member since 2005 • 10502 Posts

@finalstar2007 said:

@_Matt_ said:

For a game without a single player component this is awful.

A multiplayer only game without any split screen option.

Lems have no real local friends confirmed?

Whats worse is that it will retail for full $60 :/

should be a $30 game at this point.

Perhaps not as low as $30, but I would agree a full $60 is just too much. Especially when I can bet there will be a $45 season pass too.

Avatar image for inggrish
inggrish

10502

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#12 inggrish
Member since 2005 • 10502 Posts

@stereointegrity said:

I loved split screen in the ps2 era but bow in the era of online gaming is split screen still needed?

Yes it is still needed. It's too rare now, but I love games that allow me to play with a friend here whilst playing online at the same time.

Avatar image for REgrl4life
REgrl4life

751

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#13  Edited By REgrl4life
Member since 2007 • 751 Posts

To be honest I'm not angry about this. I mean,It's a multiplayer game, so it's going to be online multiplayer. I just am pissed there is not single player. I mean, I'm not a multiplayer gamer, but I will still buy this to play with friends. I hate played with random people.

Avatar image for Netret0120
Netret0120

3594

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#14 Netret0120
Member since 2013 • 3594 Posts

Horrible choice. Shocking.

It's bad enough that it is online only but splitscreen is necessary and isn't done enough these days.

Makes me miss Timesplitters even more

Avatar image for lglz1337
lglz1337

4959

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#16  Edited By lglz1337
Member since 2013 • 4959 Posts

lmao 20 dollar game keeps getting cheaper

https://e3.gamespot.com/forums/system-wars-314159282/why-would-anyone-pay-60-bucks-for-31026425/?page=1

score is 6 atm 1 point down and keeps falling

Avatar image for speedfreak48t5p
speedfreak48t5p

14416

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 62

User Lists: 0

#17 speedfreak48t5p
Member since 2009 • 14416 Posts

Bad idea.

Avatar image for GrenadeLauncher
GrenadeLauncher

6843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 GrenadeLauncher
Member since 2004 • 6843 Posts

RIP local multiplayer

Some of the best fun I've had on multiplayer was in Red Faction 12 years ago, pissing around with bots with my best friend. Big blunder here and in general in this industry.

Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#19 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts

Splitscreen blows.

Avatar image for Jakandsigz
Jakandsigz

6341

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Jakandsigz
Member since 2013 • 6341 Posts

This is a funy thread because cows are going around claiming victory when the Xbox 360 has almost 5x the split screen games than the PS3. and with the one, that will probably also be true.

Not even bringing up the claims by them that the Wii u had split screen because it was a last gen console. along with rumble.

Avatar image for 2Chalupas
2Chalupas

7284

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#21  Edited By 2Chalupas
Member since 2009 • 7284 Posts

@stereointegrity said:

I loved split screen in the ps2 era but bow in the era of online gaming is split screen still needed?

For local co-op?

Unfortunately this game has no story or campaign at all. So it shouldn't' be surprising it lacks split-screen. This sounds like a very cheap game, that will have 10x more marketing oomph than it will development budget.

Avatar image for Nonstop-Madness
Nonstop-Madness

12304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#22 Nonstop-Madness
Member since 2008 • 12304 Posts

whatever. I like SS but it's pretty much been dead since the 6th gen.

Avatar image for RR360DD
RR360DD

14099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#23 RR360DD
Member since 2011 • 14099 Posts

@Jakandsigz said:

This is a funy thread because cows are going around claiming victory when the Xbox 360 has almost 5x the split screen games than the PS3. and with the one, that will probably also be true.

Not even bringing up the claims by them that the Wii u had split screen because it was a last gen console. along with rumble.

Exactly. The PS3 killed splitscreen.

Good going cows

Avatar image for Suppaman100
Suppaman100

5250

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Suppaman100
Member since 2013 • 5250 Posts

@RR360DD said:

@Jakandsigz said:

This is a funy thread because cows are going around claiming victory when the Xbox 360 has almost 5x the split screen games than the PS3. and with the one, that will probably also be true.

Not even bringing up the claims by them that the Wii u had split screen because it was a last gen console. along with rumble.

Exactly. The PS3 killed splitscreen.

Good going cows

Lol, how did PS3 kill splitscreen?

Avatar image for W1NGMAN-
W1NGMAN-

10109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#25  Edited By W1NGMAN-
Member since 2008 • 10109 Posts

How are they justifying the 60 dollar price tag? Not a single online only game last gen costed full price, this is ridiculous.

Avatar image for RR360DD
RR360DD

14099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 RR360DD
Member since 2011 • 14099 Posts

@W1NGMAN- said:

How are they justifying the 60 dollar price tag? Not a single online only game last gen costed full price, this is ridiculous.

Does the crappy 4 hour tech demo campaign thats tacked onto BF4 suddenly make it worth $60?

I'm glad Respawn are focusing 100% on the multiplayer and not wasting time on a campaign no one will play.

Avatar image for locopatho
locopatho

24259

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 locopatho
Member since 2003 • 24259 Posts

I really wish people would stop repeating the lie that split screen died last gen. It didn't. Games that leave it out are usually the ones that it simply wouldn't work in, like this one. It's a team game, if you've watched any gameplay. It wouldn't make sense with just 2 or 3 players. It's like wanting a split screen Team Fortress 2. It would be pointless and lame.

Avatar image for Jakandsigz
Jakandsigz

6341

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28  Edited By Jakandsigz
Member since 2013 • 6341 Posts

@Suppaman100 said:

@RR360DD said:

@Jakandsigz said:

This is a funy thread because cows are going around claiming victory when the Xbox 360 has almost 5x the split screen games than the PS3. and with the one, that will probably also be true.

Not even bringing up the claims by them that the Wii u had split screen because it was a last gen console. along with rumble.

Exactly. The PS3 killed splitscreen.

Good going cows

Lol, how did PS3 kill splitscreen?

Well see, RROD like to add things that don't make sense.

Avatar image for MFDOOM1983
MFDOOM1983

8465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29  Edited By MFDOOM1983
Member since 2010 • 8465 Posts

@RR360DD said:

@W1NGMAN- said:

How are they justifying the 60 dollar price tag? Not a single online only game last gen costed full price, this is ridiculous.

Does the crappy 4 hour tech demo campaign thats tacked onto BF4 suddenly make it worth $60?

I'm glad Respawn are focusing 100% on the multiplayer and not wasting time on a campaign no one will play.

Sadly it seems like some gamers are concerned with the perceived value a tacked on sp campaign brings to the table(BF, COD, etc.); instead worrying if the mp component is polished and works. I'm sure people who purchased BF4 wished Dice axed the sp campaign and focused entirely on getting MP, you know, the thing you're bought the game for, up and running at launch.

Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

49568

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#30 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 49568 Posts

@W1NGMAN- said:

How are they justifying the 60 dollar price tag? Not a single online only game last gen costed full price, this is ridiculous.

How is this any different from a singleplayer game (think Alan Wake, or God of War 3) that doesn't offer multiplayer yet retails for $60?

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

61485

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#31 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 61485 Posts

Pretty much the way games have gone for a while. I'm not sure what the surprise is.

Avatar image for kuu2
kuu2

12063

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#32  Edited By kuu2
Member since 2005 • 12063 Posts

All shooters should support split screen but the sad truth is very few do now. Even BF doesn't have it, COD does but that is the exception to the rule. Thankfully Halo does as well.

Avatar image for deactivated-5f19d4c9d7318
deactivated-5f19d4c9d7318

4166

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 deactivated-5f19d4c9d7318
Member since 2008 • 4166 Posts

Disappointing, looks like i'm stuck with Halo and CoD for when my mates come round. Well for shooters anyway.

Avatar image for Blabadon
Blabadon

33030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 1

#34 Blabadon
Member since 2008 • 33030 Posts

WHAT

LOL NOW COWS CARE ABOUT SPLIT SCREEN? AFTER HALO DECIMATED THEM ALL GEN WITH IT

LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL

Man, you guys have the funniest hypocrisy in the damn world

Avatar image for locopatho
locopatho

24259

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 locopatho
Member since 2003 • 24259 Posts

@Stevo_the_gamer: Single player games never get turned off tho.

Avatar image for mems_1224
mems_1224

56919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 mems_1224
Member since 2004 • 56919 Posts

Ew, who still plays split screen?

Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

49568

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#37 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 49568 Posts

@locopatho said:

@Stevo_the_gamer: Single player games never get turned off tho.

Hopefully they stick around longer than say, for example, MAG.

Avatar image for locopatho
locopatho

24259

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38  Edited By locopatho
Member since 2003 • 24259 Posts

@kuu2 said:

All shooters should support split screen but the sad truth is very few do now. Even BF doesn't have it, COD does but that is the exception to the rule. Thankfully Halo does as well.

"Very few"? Halo 3 Reach 4, all the CODs, Far Cry 3, Left 4 Dead 1 and 2, Borderlands 1 and 2, Goldeneye, Portal 2, Gears 1 2 3 Judgement, various Splinter Cell and Rainbow 6 games, the list goes on. Who in the name of god wants to play 1 v 1 or 2 v 2 on a giant 64 player Battlefield map? It's just not designed for it. There are plenty of co op and competitive split screen shooters, but larger scale team based ones simply aren't suited for it and don't need it.

Avatar image for k2theswiss
k2theswiss

16599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 1

#39  Edited By k2theswiss
Member since 2007 • 16599 Posts

split screen. ewwwww. taking half my screen away just so the other person can cheat by looking off of it.....

Avatar image for W1NGMAN-
W1NGMAN-

10109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#40 W1NGMAN-
Member since 2008 • 10109 Posts

@Stevo_the_gamer said:

@W1NGMAN- said:

How are they justifying the 60 dollar price tag? Not a single online only game last gen costed full price, this is ridiculous.

How is this any different from a singleplayer game (think Alan Wake, or God of War 3) that doesn't offer multiplayer yet retails for $60?

Good point, only difference I suppose is the fact these online only games usually release various DLC offerings to suck more money out of players (I know this isn't an online component feature only but in a competitive setting like multiplayer not having the latest maps or weapons can lead to one feeling left out) . As well as the fact they're behind a paywall this gen on both systems.

I simply won't be able to pop in Titanfall and start playing, I'm gonna have to throw some money into Live which I haven't paid in awhile.

Avatar image for Lord_Omikron666
Lord_Omikron666

4838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#41 Lord_Omikron666
Member since 2007 • 4838 Posts

Oh well, not much of a loss for me since I refuse to play FPS's splitscreen.

Avatar image for Heil68
Heil68

60714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#42 Heil68
Member since 2004 • 60714 Posts

Eh, the person you're playing with uses to fucking find out where you out and cheat anyways. :P

Avatar image for inggrish
inggrish

10502

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#43 inggrish
Member since 2005 • 10502 Posts

@MFDOOM1983 said:

@RR360DD said:

@W1NGMAN- said:

How are they justifying the 60 dollar price tag? Not a single online only game last gen costed full price, this is ridiculous.

Does the crappy 4 hour tech demo campaign thats tacked onto BF4 suddenly make it worth $60?

I'm glad Respawn are focusing 100% on the multiplayer and not wasting time on a campaign no one will play.

Sadly it seems like some gamers are concerned with the perceived value a tacked on sp campaign brings to the table(BF, COD, etc.); instead worrying if the mp component is polished and works. I'm sure people who purchased BF4 wished Dice axed the sp campaign and focused entirely on getting MP, you know, the thing you're bought the game for, up and running at launch.

Personally, no. I actually enjoyed the SP component of BF4. The story and AI wasn't great; but it was fun constantly pushing for a certain score against online leaderboards on the levels; and it really broke up the pace and added variety when complimenting the multiplayer.

Thatsaid, sure, the multiplayer is the main part of the BF4 experience, but I feel the single player still added to the package, and I'm glad it is in there.

CoD Ghosts on the other hand...


The Single player had nothing going for it at all, worst fps campaign in so long, wasn't needed.

Then again, the multiplayer was also shit for Ghosts, all I could fall back on was Extinction mode.

I am fine with TitanFall having no single player, that's cool with me, I just find that a splitscreen element to the online would have at least made it more compelling package overall, certainly for the console platforms.

Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

49568

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#44 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 49568 Posts

@k2theswiss said:

split screen. ewwwww. taking half my screen away just so the other person can shoot looking off of it.....

That's part of the fun of it, reminds me of 4-player split-screen back in the Halo days.

@W1NGMAN- said:

Good point, only difference I suppose is the fact these online only games usually release various DLC offerings to suck more money out of players (I know this isn't an online component feature only but in a competitive setting like multiplayer not having the latest maps or weapons can lead to one feeling left out) . As well as the fact they're behind a paywall this gen on both systems.

I simply won't be able to pop in Titanfall and start playing, I'm gonna have to throw some money into Live which I haven't paid in awhile.

That's a fair point which will always be a thorn in the side of mutiplayer only games on the PS and Xbox. However, it is a notion we have been addressing since last generation with Xbox Live.

Avatar image for Crypt_mx
Crypt_mx

4739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#45 Crypt_mx
Member since 2007 • 4739 Posts

Lots of Sony fanboys complaining about a game they aren't buying of course lol There are plenty of games that go without split-screen nowadays.

Plus,I don't think there is anything wrong with this game specifically not having split screen. I have a hard enough time playing split-screen games that have less going on, like CoD, in TitanFall I can just imagine the frustration. There is a lot going on in the game, and when each element gets harder to see the game will get harder to play.

Its just one of those games where you need the full screen imo.

Avatar image for BattlefieldFan3
BattlefieldFan3

361

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 BattlefieldFan3
Member since 2012 • 361 Posts

Xbone is bad at multitasking due to terrible ending. So weak and only smart enough to do 1 thing at once. PS4 can do multiple things at once and each of the things it does, it does better than what the Xbone spends all its power doing.

Avatar image for k2theswiss
k2theswiss

16599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 1

#47  Edited By k2theswiss
Member since 2007 • 16599 Posts

@Stevo_the_gamer:

@Stevo_the_gamer said:

@k2theswiss said:

split screen. ewwwww. taking half my screen away just so the other person can cheat by looking off of it.....

That's part of the fun of it, reminds me of 4-player split-screen back in the Halo days.

ooo good old halo. even though i wasn't big fan of reach or 4 it still has a spot in my heart

Avatar image for bobbetybob
bobbetybob

19370

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#49  Edited By bobbetybob
Member since 2005 • 19370 Posts

At least CoD excels in one area, is it seriously the only next gen FPS with splitscreen?

Titanfall would actually have been good with splitscreen as well with all the AI running around it would have actually made 1 Vs 1 quite fun.

Avatar image for renegade311
Renegade311

350

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#50  Edited By Renegade311
Member since 2013 • 350 Posts

Split screen is too distracting for me.