[QUOTE="freedomfreak"][QUOTE="jhonMalcovich"]
Ok. Maybe I am wrong. I just find suspicious that all secondary activities of Far Cry 3 migrated to GTA VÂ :P
MORE LIKE ALL SECONDARY ACTIVITIES FROM RED DEAD REDEMPTION AND PAST GTA GAMES MIGRATED TO GTAV. Seriously, games copy each other all the time. The difference lies within how they implement the "copied" gameplay features. And that, young padawan, is what counts.The problem is all previous sand boxes did it better than GTA V even if they copied from previous Rockstar games.
Far Cry 3 did better scuba diving, hunting, killing spree, assesination missions, it was more fun to wreak havoc, even driving was more challenging, scooter time races were just awesome, better island exploration.
Just Cause 2, bigger island, better tools to wreak havoc and probably better MP.
RDR had better shooting.
GTA4 had better shooting and characters motivations.
Archam City had better trophies, world exploration, melee combat and story .
Assasin Creed had better assesination and infilitration missions. Brotherhood had awesome Davinchi machines missions.
How is wreaking havoc more fun in FC 3? Give me one example that beats a sticky bomb at a major intersection. Hunting was half of the game in Far Cry 3. Assassination missions were the same thing everytime in FC 3 and they were quite tedious. How is driving in FC 3 more challenging than weaving through traffic at 80mph in GTA? Just Cause 2 is a lifeless, copy and paste world. Terrible ai as well. Assassins Creed hase better assassination missions? You dont say, thats like saying Gran Turismo had beter driving than FC 3. Arkham city is based around melee combat so its melee ought to be better than GTA.
Log in to comment