Up to each consumer really. I would personnaly say "yes". But that is not an ultimate "one answer fits all"
of any given platform 90+ % (give or take) are multiplats anyways. Consoles have the advantage of the ease of use. the Whole one size fits all is enough for some people, but it is a flaw for others. So it depends on each person.
The PC gives the user a much more well knitted experience, you can decide what control scheme and method is best for you, A controller is not an universal best, it is a Jack of all trades, but master of none input device, made to Work with a wide arrey of games, but Work flawlessly with none. That in itself can be a turnoff for some.
Then the games itself. You can set whatever Visuals you Desire on a PC, some people do not like too much clutter, others prefer full blown graphical bells and whistles.
You are able to mod a game most of the time, make changes to Things you dislike, or alter as you wish. It is safe to say that in alot of cases the NeXT iteration of a given game is often influenced by mods made b the previous. Not to mention graphical overhauls which makes older games worth playing (often having better results then "hd remasters".
Backwards compatability is also a huge plus for the pc, meaning no need for a console for each gen of games.
If the above does not appeal to you, and if you can live with a control method which simply Works well enough, but far from flawless, then a console is a fairly good alternative.
This is without the Whole cost debate (believe me, you do not want to touch that one, go ahead and do the total lifetime cost for any platform, you will often find that they end up very close).
Log in to comment