Is Nintendo still the King of Gaming?

  • 108 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for ps4hasnogames
PS4hasNOgames

2620

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#1 PS4hasNOgames
Member since 2014 • 2620 Posts

When anyone thinks of gaming they call it Nintendo. Too many classics, too much history.

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2  Edited By lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

@ps4hasnogames said:

When anyone thinks of gaming they call it Nintendo.

No....

Avatar image for deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20
deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20

82724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 56

User Lists: 0

#3 deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20
Member since 2006 • 82724 Posts

Yep.

Avatar image for bldgirsh
BldgIrsh

3044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 5

#4 BldgIrsh
Member since 2014 • 3044 Posts

Needs more weeaboo's.

Avatar image for rekthard
REKThard

479

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#5  Edited By REKThard
Member since 2014 • 479 Posts

probably no

Avatar image for stuff238
stuff238

3284

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#6 stuff238
Member since 2012 • 3284 Posts

They have not been king since the SNES.

Avatar image for MirkoS77
MirkoS77

17669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#7 MirkoS77
Member since 2011 • 17669 Posts

They once were.

Avatar image for bunchanumbers
bunchanumbers

5709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#8 bunchanumbers
Member since 2013 • 5709 Posts

They are the true kings of gaming. The movie games are not games.

Avatar image for LegatoSkyheart
LegatoSkyheart

29733

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 1

#9 LegatoSkyheart
Member since 2009 • 29733 Posts

@lostrib said:

@ps4hasnogames said:

When anyone thinks of gaming they call it Nintendo.

No....

Yeah for real. No one thinks of the Wii or WiiU when they think gaming now. Just look at some shopping websites it's an Xbox or a Playstation filling that role.

Avatar image for Jolt_counter119
Jolt_counter119

4226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 Jolt_counter119
Member since 2010 • 4226 Posts

I would say so, yeah. Who else? Microsoft (lol) or Sony? Sony could have been but with the ps3 losing a lot of franchises to third party, and not being able to really capitalize on old franchises, they've become pretty much even to Microsoft. I mean, how do you lose exclusivity to Kingdom Hearts 3? It doesn't even make sense for it to be on xbox lol. And even Metal Gear Solid is now on Xbox.

Avatar image for deactivated-5ebea105efb64
deactivated-5ebea105efb64

7262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#11 deactivated-5ebea105efb64
Member since 2013 • 7262 Posts

@bunchanumbers said:

They are the true kings of gaming. The movie games are not games.

Avatar image for coregamerelite
CoreGamerElite

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#12 CoreGamerElite
Member since 2014 • 25 Posts

They are not. They are king of terrible childish games. not real games. PC is King

Avatar image for jasonn36
JasonN36

160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#13 JasonN36
Member since 2014 • 160 Posts

But but but... The Virtual Boy?!

Avatar image for aroxx_ab
aroxx_ab

13236

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 aroxx_ab
Member since 2005 • 13236 Posts

All know who Mario is so they have kinda strong impact on gaming but far from good mainplatform to game with.

Avatar image for KillzoneSnake
KillzoneSnake

2761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 37

User Lists: 0

#15  Edited By KillzoneSnake
Member since 2012 • 2761 Posts

They were 20 years ago.

Avatar image for m_machine024
m_machine024

15874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 m_machine024
Member since 2006 • 15874 Posts

Nintendo is more like a living legend.

Avatar image for KungfuKitten
KungfuKitten

27389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#17  Edited By KungfuKitten
Member since 2006 • 27389 Posts

They are the ones who understand gaming the best. And make great games. I'm not sure there can be a king in this vastly expanded and diversified market. If there is a throne, they definitely have a claim to the throne.

Avatar image for miiiiv
miiiiv

943

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#18  Edited By miiiiv
Member since 2013 • 943 Posts

Nintendo was king in the 80's and the 90's (definitely the first half of the 90's anyway) and they are probably the the most versatile developer to this day. But today there are several other developers that makes games that rivals Nintendo's own in terms of gameplay and that was hardly the case in the 80's and early 90's.

Avatar image for deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
deactivated-57ad0e5285d73

21398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
Member since 2009 • 21398 Posts

They're in a master class. Not discrediting other development studios but everybody else pales in comparison.

Avatar image for bezza2011
bezza2011

2729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#20  Edited By bezza2011
Member since 2006 • 2729 Posts

@Jolt_counter119 said:

I would say so, yeah. Who else? Microsoft (lol) or Sony? Sony could have been but with the ps3 losing a lot of franchises to third party, and not being able to really capitalize on old franchises, they've become pretty much even to Microsoft. I mean, how do you lose exclusivity to Kingdom Hearts 3? It doesn't even make sense for it to be on xbox lol. And even Metal Gear Solid is now on Xbox.

I'm not sure Sony ever lost kingdom hearts 3, it was just shown at there press conference and metal gear solid, is from a third party developer, they was never exclusive, it was just the fact when MGS came out, the only true platform was Playstation for that type of genre, but MGS later came to Xbox once it became established, MGS4 was pretty much a wink to the old MGS game and so better suited to the PS3.

Avatar image for deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
deactivated-57ad0e5285d73

21398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
Member since 2009 • 21398 Posts

@miiiiv said:

Nintendo was king in the 80's and the 90's (definitely the first half of the 90's anyway) and they are probably the the most versatile developer to this day. But today there are several other developers that makes games that rivals Nintendo's own in terms of gameplay and that was hardly the case in the 80's and early 90's.

People are blind. They still put out great games. Simply compare Nintendos yearly releases with any other developer and I guarantee they will pale in comparison. Also, it was during the 80s and 90s when Sega was truly making exceptional stuff on a nintendo-esque level.

With lower than expected wiiu sales and the general tone on this board(seems to be changing though), i feel inclined to say that most of the ms/sony fanboys havent played the more recent nintendo releases, outside of "a few levels".

Avatar image for Cloud_imperium
Cloud_imperium

15146

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 103

User Lists: 8

#22 Cloud_imperium
Member since 2013 • 15146 Posts

Not anymore IMO . But that doesn't mean Sony is King (lol , hell no) . Nintendo is still better than other console first party devs in a lot of ways but things aren't the same. Many third party devs have surpassed them but as I said , they are better than most first party studios . They are good but not King of gaming .

Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

44125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23  Edited By SecretPolice  Online
Member since 2007 • 44125 Posts

Nintendo never was king now Sega on the other hand was known as King of the Arcade. :P

Avatar image for MarkAndExecute
MarkAndExecute

450

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 MarkAndExecute
Member since 2012 • 450 Posts

The only throne they sit on is a toilet, taking a huge dump of pooware that Nintendo fans happily eat up. =p

Avatar image for ps4hasnogames
PS4hasNOgames

2620

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#25 PS4hasNOgames
Member since 2014 • 2620 Posts

@coregamerelite said:

They are not. They are king of terrible childish games. not real games. PC is King

lol RTS trash and indies arent real games. Mario, Zelda, Smash, Metroid, Donkey Kong shits on the entire pathetic PC catalogue.

Go start another petition for a 2008 game LMFAO.

Avatar image for Pikminmaniac
Pikminmaniac

11513

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#26 Pikminmaniac
Member since 2006 • 11513 Posts

In terms of gameplay and level design in both quality and quantity, yes, they are still the king.

Avatar image for miiiiv
miiiiv

943

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#27 miiiiv
Member since 2013 • 943 Posts

@Heirren said:

@miiiiv said:

Nintendo was king in the 80's and the 90's (definitely the first half of the 90's anyway) and they are probably the the most versatile developer to this day. But today there are several other developers that makes games that rivals Nintendo's own in terms of gameplay and that was hardly the case in the 80's and early 90's.

People are blind. They still put out great games. Simply compare Nintendos yearly releases with any other developer and I guarantee they will pale in comparison. Also, it was during the 80s and 90s when Sega was truly making exceptional stuff on a nintendo-esque level.

With lower than expected wiiu sales and the general tone on this board(seems to be changing though), i feel inclined to say that most of the ms/sony fanboys havent played the more recent nintendo releases, outside of "a few levels".

I agree Nintendo is still the single most talented developer. They make great games in many different genres, most devs these days only master one or two genres. And yes, Sega was also really good during the 80's and 90's but they had nothing on quite the same level as Super Mario Word, Super Metroid and Zelda a Link to the past.

Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#28 Bread_or_Decide
Member since 2007 • 29761 Posts

Nintendo are the kings of game-PLAY. Their games play so flawlessly it's scary.

Avatar image for m64
m64

272

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#29 m64
Member since 2005 • 272 Posts

Definitely

Avatar image for deactivated-5b0367b217732
deactivated-5b0367b217732

1697

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 9

#30 deactivated-5b0367b217732
Member since 2014 • 1697 Posts

Nintendo hasn't been "the king" since the SNES era. The Playstation brand pretty much took over after that.

They have also lost their crown when it comes to portable gaming, though sadly, not to a "worthy opponent..."

Avatar image for Litchie
Litchie

34654

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#31  Edited By Litchie
Member since 2003 • 34654 Posts

Yes. No other developer releases great game after great game as often as Nintendo. That Nintendo is King of gaming is pretty much fact.

Avatar image for mariokart64fan
mariokart64fan

20828

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 101

User Lists: 1

#32 mariokart64fan
Member since 2003 • 20828 Posts

Lmfao yes any one who think not are noobs and doesn't know anything about gaming

Avatar image for SolidGame_basic
SolidGame_basic

45215

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 SolidGame_basic
Member since 2003 • 45215 Posts
Loading Video...

Avatar image for kraptacular69
kraptacular69

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#34 kraptacular69
Member since 2014 • 25 Posts

ColecoVision will dominate once again

Avatar image for tonitorsi
tonitorsi

8692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#35  Edited By tonitorsi
Member since 2006 • 8692 Posts

They're not Kings, but a very important pillar of gaming.

Without Nintendo, this industry is pretty much dead. Same more or less could be said for Sony.

Both companies have shaped this market insurmountably.

Avatar image for Heil68
Heil68

60718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#36 Heil68
Member since 2004 • 60718 Posts

lol

Avatar image for ConanTheStoner
ConanTheStoner

23712

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38  Edited By ConanTheStoner
Member since 2011 • 23712 Posts

@tonitorsi said:

They're not Kings, but a very important pillar of gaming.

Without Nintendo, this industry is pretty much dead. Same more or less could be said for Sony and PlayStation.

Both have shaped this market insurmountably.

Avatar image for sonic_spark
sonic_spark

6195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#39 sonic_spark
Member since 2003 • 6195 Posts

For first party games, they are unmatched. Their consoles have been able to survive over 15 years of no third party support. That's saying a lot.

The hardware is innovative, but after the gamecube, the last 2 generations have lacked "raw power".

Nintendo lacks 2 things, 1.) third party support, 2.) getting with the times such as their online functionality.

At the end of the day, if Nintendo supplies me with all their franchises and a new one or two each gen, I will continue to purchase a Nintendo console.

Avatar image for Rock-City
Rock-City

1533

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 Rock-City
Member since 2004 • 1533 Posts

Hell no. As someone who grew up on NES and SNES, Nintendo doesn't even cross my mind anymore when I think of games I wanna play.

Avatar image for Peanutbutterz
Peanutbutterz

219

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 Peanutbutterz
Member since 2011 • 219 Posts

So far this gen, Nintendo is showing that they're as strong as ever with producing the games they have so far.

You can't just base winning mainly as winning an arms race ie who has the better hardware. Leave that to the PCs.

Avatar image for Gue1
Gue1

12171

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#42  Edited By Gue1
Member since 2004 • 12171 Posts

my story with nintendo ended with the snes, when they still had 3rd party to provide the variety that they alone can't. Irrelevant since then they have been, except for maybe Ocarina of Time.

Avatar image for Flubbbs
Flubbbs

4968

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 Flubbbs
Member since 2010 • 4968 Posts

havent really cared for Nintendo since snes

Avatar image for smashed_pinata
smashed_pinata

3747

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#45 smashed_pinata
Member since 2005 • 3747 Posts

Nintendo is and always will be the grandaddy OG KING of gaming.

Avatar image for blueinheaven
blueinheaven

5554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#46 blueinheaven
Member since 2008 • 5554 Posts

Nintendo are kings of self parody so in that sense they are probably kings of sorts in videogaming as self parody is pretty much what it's all about these days what COD are we on now 25 or something?

They are definitely Kings Of Crap Hardware in that category they are undisputed champions.

Avatar image for Ballroompirate
Ballroompirate

26695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#47 Ballroompirate
Member since 2005 • 26695 Posts

No

Avatar image for p3anut
p3anut

6610

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 p3anut
Member since 2005 • 6610 Posts

Nintendo is king on making games but gaming in general, no they are not.

Avatar image for trugs26
trugs26

7539

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#49  Edited By trugs26
Member since 2004 • 7539 Posts

Actually nowadays when people (e.g in movies, tv shows) refer to something about video games, they usually say Playstation or Xbox.

Nintendo does have the strongest brand in video games though. They're like the Disney or Pixar of video games. They have a rich history and continue to make the top grade products.

Avatar image for miiiiv
miiiiv

943

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#50  Edited By miiiiv
Member since 2013 • 943 Posts
@ps4hasnogames said:

lol RTS trash and indies arent real games.

Many RTS games are very sophisticated and deep and require some thought process. It's often console specific titles that are extremely linear, almost like they are on rails and sometimes with a few button combos to parkour in certain places, that aren't real games, as they are more like semi interactive movies.