I have ps3, 360, and gaming PC's. Though I think it's valid to want one system to do the best, it really messes up the industry if the ps3 is not learned. I am not going to get into techno jargon or turn this into what system is more powerful. But I am going to talk just from basic "what we know" here.
The ps3 is harder to develop for supposedly. The ports (minus fight night and maybe oblivion and a few others) have suffered as a result of lazy porting. This is really helping the developers in the short run as they blaze through a quick and low cost conversion, but it will hurt them in the long run.
Why will it hurt them? Because the playstation has the strongest brand image. It is a system seller in its own right. The ps3 WILL sell. If they take the easy way out and the games don't get better, then the ps3 Won't sell and that will prevent a lot of people from buying systems. The ps3 owners won't JUST go to the 360. The wii can't handle certain games and next gen features, so Microsoft will be the only competitor. That isn't good for the end user as well because then competition will be weaker.
It's pretty annoying to see all these developers not taking advantage of the ps3 hardware (for however powerful or not) it is and just port over games using only the basics.
Log in to comment