How and why does anyone think the PS5 is even remotely as capable as the Series X

  • 129 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Avatar image for sealionact
sealionact

9822

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#101 sealionact
Member since 2014 • 9822 Posts

@tormentos: "Yeah i guess you didn't touch the xbox one from 2013 to 2017.

Thats like saying the only graphical advantage the xbox will have in on exclusives,what make you think that developer just like the pushed the PS4,xbox one X they will not push the xbox series X and PS5 as well?"

Do me a favour, explain your first point and what it has to do with what I said, and then read your second point and ask yourself what you meant...because I dont know what you meant to say.

Avatar image for deactivated-6092a2d005fba
deactivated-6092a2d005fba

22663

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#102 deactivated-6092a2d005fba
Member since 2015 • 22663 Posts

@r-gamer said:

@i_p_daily: Well first we have Cerny saying it would rarely drop below 10.3.

Then devs saying the gap is smaller then it appears.

http://www.pushsquare.com/news/2020/03/ps5_superior_to_xbox_series_x_in_a_lot_of_ways_but_devs_seem_disappointed_by_sonys_communication

Also if you listened to the conference it takes a 1% drop in clock to save 10% power. So dropping down to 9.2 tf would require almost a 10% drop in clock speed which is a 100% drop in power. Not happening.

People are still taking the github leak at 9.2tf which was on RDNA1 to guess that number. It was a test sample but not final silicon.

Oh an article on push square about a guy who got text messages from developers LOL.

Lets wait until the thing is out and has games released on it. I'd rather not take the word a of shill like Dana Carvey or some dude who got texts from devs.

Avatar image for Sokol4ever
Sokol4ever

6717

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#103 Sokol4ever
Member since 2007 • 6717 Posts

@bluestars: I am not sure if I should even bother responding to your "claim".

I would suggest a visit to optometrist but I doubt that would change your complete biased, misinformation..

I will point just one thing out, the size of the world between God of War and Hellblade isn't even up for debate and please don't tell me you compared Horizon world to Metro...

I have played all the games you mention and I am sorry... I'm speechless to your blind claims..

Avatar image for AfterShafter
AfterShafter

7175

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#104 AfterShafter
Member since 2002 • 7175 Posts

I don't think about it at all. Hardware power is almost never the defining factor in the quality of a game. Hell, many of the best games that come out could probably be made for two generation old hardware and lost practically nothing. These days I primarily game on a PC that is likely already more powerful than the next Playstation and XBOX consoles and half the time I find myself enjoying stuff like Cuphead, Braid, and Hollow Knight the most.

Avatar image for Tessellation
Tessellation

9297

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#105 Tessellation
Member since 2009 • 9297 Posts

@joshrmeyer: @joshrmeyer: lol those insiders are bunch of Sony fanboys that can't sleep at night knowing the Xbox is more powerful, what matters today with the new tech is CU counts and x has 44% more CUs who in their mind will claim is inferior to something with less CU count and inferior bandwidth.... Just because they bumped the speed of the GPU is superior lol...

Avatar image for r-gamer
R-Gamer

2221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#106 R-Gamer
Member since 2019 • 2221 Posts

@i_p_daily: I agree, seeing the games is the best way to settle it.

Avatar image for deactivated-5ebd39d683340
deactivated-5ebd39d683340

4089

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#107 deactivated-5ebd39d683340
Member since 2005 • 4089 Posts

It's a wait and see for both consoles. Both have interesting innovations and power advantages. Multiplatform games will for sure look a bit better on X. Sony game studios are insanely talent though so the PS5 specs are more than enough for innovation.

Avatar image for joshrmeyer
JoshRMeyer

12577

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#108 JoshRMeyer
Member since 2015 • 12577 Posts

@Tessellation: it's also all over youtube, not just fanboys. Sounds like less CUs with higher clock speeds are actually better for performance. Doesn't sound like the systems will perform much different.

Avatar image for redviperofdorne
redviperofdorne

496

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 123

User Lists: 0

#109 redviperofdorne
Member since 2016 • 496 Posts

It's looking like Sony is sacrificing better-looking games for speed, which is fine for most but will irk some people. The Series X will clearly be the better, more powerful machine and I can't wait to pre-order it.

What it ultimately comes down to is if Microsoft can deliver on consistent exclusives and having the Series X at an affordable price. I mean let's face it, Backward Compatibility and Game Pass blow Sony out of the water at this point.

Avatar image for bluestars
Bluestars

2789

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#110 Bluestars
Member since 2019 • 2789 Posts

@Sokol4ever:

All my claims are facts!

Your acceptance is not required

HAH

Avatar image for nirgal
Nirgal

694

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#111 Nirgal
Member since 2019 • 694 Posts

@jahnee said:

It's a wait and see for both consoles. Both have interesting innovations and power advantages. Multiplatform games will for sure look a bit better on X. Sony game studios are insanely talent though so the PS5 specs are more than enough for innovation.

I agree, lets see also what happens when the multiplatforms start arriving. logic dictates they would run better at series x, but what will the difference be? and will the series x be much more expensive that the PS5?

A lot of things that we still dont know.

Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38036

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#112 cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38036 Posts

@getyeryayasout said:

I trust Sony's software to impress and make up the difference.

There's nothing on my X1X that is as impressive as God of War on base PS4 to me, visually speaking.

You poser

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#113  Edited By ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

@joshrmeyer said:

@Tessellation: it's also all over youtube, not just fanboys. Sounds like less CUs with higher clock speeds are actually better for performance. Doesn't sound like the systems will perform much different.

Nope, Sony didn't add extra memory bandwidth on top of NAVI 10's 448 GB/s for slightly higher GpGPU TFLOPS, extra RT cores and extra PC CPU memory bandwidth consumer (e.g. PC 128bit DDR4-3800 has 60GB/s).

RX 5700 XT has 9.66 TFLOPS average with 448 GB/s.

PS5 GPU has 10.28 TFLOPS peak with 448 GB/s which is shared with RT cores and CPUs.

XSX GPU has 12.147 TFLOPS with 560 GB/s which is shared with RT cores and CPUs.

---

RTX 2070 has 8.6 TFLOPS average with 448 GB/s which is shared with RT core.

RTX 2080 FE has 11.67 TFLOPS average with 448 GB/s which is shared with RT cores.

RTX 2080 Super FE has 11.86 TFLOPS average with 496 GB/s which is shared with RT cores.

XSX can brute force a PC workload with 60 GB/s for CPU and 500 GB/s for GPU e.g. 2 weeks raw Gears 5 port's benchmark yielding RTX 2080 level result.

Avatar image for madsnakehhh
madsnakehhh

18256

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#115 madsnakehhh
Member since 2007 • 18256 Posts

I miss the bit wars ... everything was so easy ... 8 bit, 16 bit ... pick your brand and play your games.

Avatar image for deactivated-5ebd39d683340
deactivated-5ebd39d683340

4089

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#116  Edited By deactivated-5ebd39d683340
Member since 2005 • 4089 Posts

@nirgal: It also really depends which console you want for what purpose? Playstation is the better single player console while Xbox is the better for Multiplayer. Game pass and Xbox Live alongside the controller (now with very low input lag) and MS studios producing Multiplayer games it makes it the console of choice for multiplayer gamers. So I will get both but first the XsX.

Avatar image for navyguy21
navyguy21

17451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#117 navyguy21
Member since 2003 • 17451 Posts

A 2070 will never match a 2080 super, no matter how much you overclock it.

I'm not sure how people are ignoring that and grasping with high hopes.

Modern GPUs aren't built that way, especially AMD.

Dont trust my words, I'm just another forum user.

Just go back and look at the last few gens of gpus and see the base vs boost clock? Factory OC cards? User overclock?

Its usually in the realm 5-10% improvement to frames, but the hardware remains the same....meaning you aren't suddenly able to run at higher settings.

Series X will have a clear advantage just by the nature of having more compute units.

I don't understand why it bothers people to the point that they lie to themselves. PS5 will have amazing games that look great, isn't that what matters?

Avatar image for robert_sparkes
robert_sparkes

7266

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#118  Edited By robert_sparkes
Member since 2018 • 7266 Posts

The pricing of these systems is going to be key PS5 could be 399 but I expect the x series to be at least 499.

Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

44167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#119 SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 44167 Posts

Boom, head shot. :P

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33784

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#120 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33784 Posts

@Tessellation:

🤣🤣🤣

So now is no longer a TFflop thing,now is 44% more CU to make the gap seem bigger than it is.

Avatar image for Uruz7laevatein
Uruz7laevatein

160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#121  Edited By Uruz7laevatein
Member since 2009 • 160 Posts

@tormentos: which is funny using an Nvidia comparison in CU leap makes alot of less sense since CU scale alot more linearly with overall GPU performance on Nvidia GPUs (2070 to 2080S/Ti is like two tiers of leap and is a red-herring), or that XSX lower clocked CU count is clocked alot lower than usual than what would of hypothetically existed on a PC counterpart and split memory pools is now super amazing according to some people lol.

Avatar image for deactivated-618bc23e9b1c9
deactivated-618bc23e9b1c9

7339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#122 deactivated-618bc23e9b1c9
Member since 2007 • 7339 Posts

Seems like Sony is over-depending on their exclusives and that's all they're gonna have this coming gen. They also wanted to depend on PSVR, but that doesn't seem significant enough to count for much.

Avatar image for mojito1988
mojito1988

4726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#123 mojito1988
Member since 2006 • 4726 Posts

Why do I think Ps5 will be more capable than the X-Box Series X? Simple it is the same Reason I think Switch will be more capable than X-Box Series X.

BETTER GAMES.

Avatar image for gifford38
Gifford38

7228

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#124  Edited By Gifford38
Member since 2020 • 7228 Posts

I feel bad for xbox owners when all the first party has to make the game run on xbox 1 x with the harddrive in mind instead the ssd. game going to be based around the harddrive. for the first 2 years of the series x.

Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38036

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#125 cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38036 Posts

@getyeryayasout said:

@cainetao11: How so?

I.....................................am not sure. But you are

Avatar image for masonshoemocker
masonshoemocker

740

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#126  Edited By masonshoemocker
Member since 2003 • 740 Posts

@gifford38: what are you talking about? The only thing any drive does is store the information of the game. I don't know if you know this, but when you install a game on the Xbox, you are able to choose where that game gets installed to. So how again are you feeling bad for xbox owners when developers don't really care what drive their game gets stored to?

Avatar image for robert_sparkes
robert_sparkes

7266

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#128 robert_sparkes
Member since 2018 • 7266 Posts

Whatever MS do the 3rd party go with the market leader as the priority unless paid 2nd party.

Avatar image for BlackShirt20
BlackShirt20

2631

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#129 BlackShirt20
Member since 2005 • 2631 Posts

@tormentos: want to know a little secret (actually well known) about CU’s?

You know that ray tracing that you won’t shut up about? Yeah, you kind of need CU’s to do ray tracing.

Avatar image for gifford38
Gifford38

7228

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#130 Gifford38
Member since 2020 • 7228 Posts

@masonshoemocker: yes but with fast load speeds The game refresh rate is much faster. Look at multiplayer. While your ready you have to wait for the Xbox one x users catches up for the load screen working off the harddrive. Besides SSD on ps5 and the Xbox series x is more than just storage it is how fast that information comes off the drive while you are playing the game.

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#131  Edited By ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

@Uruz7laevatein said:

@tormentos: which is funny using an Nvidia comparison in CU leap makes alot of less sense since CU scale alot more linearly with overall GPU performance on Nvidia GPUs (2070 to 2080S/Ti is like two tiers of leap and is a red-herring), or that XSX lower clocked CU count is clocked alot lower than usual than what would of hypothetically existed on a PC counterpart and split memory pools is now super amazing according to some people lol.

Overclocked FE 2070 at ~2200 Mhz wouldn't beat RTX 2070 Super let alone RTX 2080 FE or RTX 2080 Super FE

https://www.techpowerup.com/review/nvidia-geforce-rtx-2080-founders-edition/37.html

RTX 2080 FE has 11.65 TFLOPS at 1887Mhz average with 448 GB/s memory bandwidth. The test PC has 128 bit DDR4-3867 (61.8 GB/s) memory for the CPU side.

https://www.techpowerup.com/review/nvidia-geforce-rtx-2080-super-founders-edition/33.html

RTX 2080 Super FE has 11,79 TFLOPS at 1919Mhz average with 496 GB/s memory bandwidth.

Doom 2020 game has some nextgen GPU features usage. RTX 2080 iTU104) s scaling nearly close to it's TFLOPS rating from RTX 2070 with 8.6 TFLOPS average.

https://www.techpowerup.com/review/nvidia-geforce-rtx-2080-ti-founders-edition/37.html

RTX 2080 Ti has 1824 Mhz average hence 15,876 TFLOPS. RTX 2080 Ti is scaling somewhat close to it's TFLOPS rating from RTX 2070 with 8.6 TFLOPS average, but RTX 2080 Ti is another class above TU104 GPUs.

Avatar image for masonshoemocker
masonshoemocker

740

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#132 masonshoemocker
Member since 2003 • 740 Posts

@gifford38: Let me try to understand your point of view. You think that 1st party games for Series X will be at a disadvantage because they will be on a HDD on the X1X?

So you think a game that was on a HDD on a PC doesn't load up faster when it is then moved onto a SSD? These consoles are all x86. These games will load up fast on a SSD regardless. This SSD that Sony is touting is not gonna make up for power.