Find me a console game with a better texture then this one on PC Crysis 2

  • 164 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

#51 Posted by mrfrosty151986 (526 posts) -

[QUOTE="Inconsistancy"]

[QUOTE="mrfrosty151986"]

:D

asdfasdf

nameless12345

bullets

The texture's so good that the shell casings are 2d!

So?

Modern games are still rather low-poly.

Crisp texture > blocky 3D model, tbh.

Bring on voxels if you want full 3D graphics...

They're not 3D... they're a 2D decal, but it's being addressed in a MOD...
#52 Posted by mrfrosty151986 (526 posts) -
[QUOTE="AmazonTreeBoa"][QUOTE="mrfrosty151986"][QUOTE="AmazonTreeBoa"] Show me a console gamer that even gives a sh!t.

You do for posting that comment, especially swearing too...... :lol:

I am a hermit you clueless dumbass, so try again. Like I said, show me a console gamer that even gives a sh!t. You can't because they don't. Also, your reply leads me to believe you aren't to bright seeing that ignorance was the best response you could come up with.

Personal insults now...... Touched a nerve have I....
#53 Posted by ronvalencia (15130 posts) -

[QUOTE="Inconsistancy"][QUOTE="nameless12345"]

So?

Modern games are still rather low-poly.

Crisp texture > blocky 3D model, tbh.

Bring on voxels if you want full 3D graphics...

nameless12345

Voxels, why? Then you're going to have stupid little square bullets, unless you use a quadrillion voxels to define one casing instead of a 30~ poly one.

Voxels aren't geometry limited so a quadrillion voxels would be possible if you had a beefy CPU and lots of RAM.

They don't make any use of GPU acceleration, tho, and that's also the reason why they haven't established themselves.

But with modern GPUs supporting GPGPU, they could be used to render voxels too.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OTOY

OTOY first showed its real-time rendering technology at the "Cinema 2.0" launch event for the ATI Radeon HD 4000 family of GPUs in June 2008. The technology demonstration, featuring ATI's mascot Ruby fleeing from a giant robot in a photorealistic New York City street, used ray tracing and voxel rendering and ran in realtime on 2 HD 4870 GPUs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0YjXCae4Gu0


Voxels (volumetric pixels) can be accelerated by programmable shader equiped GPUs. Voxels are use for Crysis's terrain engine.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=betTuSmIFkQ Voxel accelerated by GPUs.

#54 Posted by gamespot4life (1224 posts) -

This texture is from the Maldo Mod. it does look great. I cant wait for a texture pack for farcry 3

#55 Posted by The_Game21x (26342 posts) -

Dude...it's common knowledge that PCs are leaps and bounds ahead of consoles visually. What's the point in beating the dead horse anymore?

#56 Posted by JameMcCabe (361 posts) -

[QUOTE="AmazonTreeBoa"][QUOTE="mrfrosty151986"] You do for posting that comment, especially swearing too...... :lol:mrfrosty151986
I am a hermit you clueless dumbass, so try again. Like I said, show me a console gamer that even gives a sh!t. You can't because they don't. Also, your reply leads me to believe you aren't to bright seeing that ignorance was the best response you could come up with.

Personal insults now...... Touched a nerve have I....

It's what they do best. Don't let it get to you.

#57 Posted by ronvalencia (15130 posts) -

[QUOTE="mrfrosty151986"]

The detail:shock:

AmazonTreeBoa

Show me a console gamer that even gives a sh!t.

Recall "Teh CELL!!!" from PS3 fanboys.

Faceoff gaming web sites e.g. DF and Eurogamer.

#58 Posted by RyviusARC (4617 posts) -

I am a hermit you clueless dumbass, so try again. Like I said, show me a console gamer that even gives a sh!t. You can't because they don't. Also, your reply leads me to believe you aren't to bright seeing that ignorance was the best response you could come up with.AmazonTreeBoa

Console gamer do care when you see threads comparing Gears 3 vs Uncharted 3.

They compare the smallest detail down to pixels like in the old thread where they maginified an Alan Wake screenshot and counted the pixels to confirm it was not 720P.

#59 Posted by seanmcloughlin (38216 posts) -

TC is trying way too hard. All these stupidly obvious threads

#60 Posted by AmazonTreeBoa (16745 posts) -
[QUOTE="mrfrosty151986"][QUOTE="AmazonTreeBoa"][QUOTE="mrfrosty151986"] You do for posting that comment, especially swearing too...... :lol:

I am a hermit you clueless dumbass, so try again. Like I said, show me a console gamer that even gives a sh!t. You can't because they don't. Also, your reply leads me to believe you aren't to bright seeing that ignorance was the best response you could come up with.

Personal insults now...... Touched a nerve have I....

No dumbass, I insult everybody here all the time. It is my SW persona moron. You want the nice me, then go to OT, computer hardware, PC, or PS3 forums.
#61 Posted by slimjimbadboy (1731 posts) -

[QUOTE="AmazonTreeBoa"][QUOTE="mrfrosty151986"]

The detail:shock:

ronvalencia

Show me a console gamer that even gives a sh!t.

Recall "Teh CELL!!!" from PS3 fanboys.

Faceoff gaming web sites e.g. DF and Eurogamer.

Oh but haven't you heard? The bird is the word... no wait, consolites don't care about graphics.

#62 Posted by mrfrosty151986 (526 posts) -

[QUOTE="ronvalencia"]

[QUOTE="AmazonTreeBoa"] Show me a console gamer that even gives a sh!t.slimjimbadboy

Recall "Teh CELL!!!" from PS3 fanboys.

Faceoff gaming web sites e.g. DF and Eurogamer.

Oh but haven't you heard? The bird is the word... no wait, consolites don't care about graphics.

Hahaha... is that a joke? The sheer amount of threads about graphics made by console sheep in SW is ridiculous and you say they don't care?...Hahahaha :lol:

#63 Posted by AmazonTreeBoa (16745 posts) -

[QUOTE="AmazonTreeBoa"]I am a hermit you clueless dumbass, so try again. Like I said, show me a console gamer that even gives a sh!t. You can't because they don't. Also, your reply leads me to believe you aren't to bright seeing that ignorance was the best response you could come up with.RyviusARC

Console gamer do care when you see threads comparing Gears 3 vs Uncharted 3.

They compare the smallest detail down to pixels like in the old thread where they maginified an Alan Wake screenshot and counted the pixels to confirm it was not 720P.

No console gamers don't care. And your response clearly shows you have no clue what this thread is even about. You are comparing a console game to a console game.......herrr Derp. Seeing what I said clearly went over your head. I will explain. I am saying console gamers don't give a rats ass that PC has better graphics. Don't be so slow.
#64 Posted by mrfrosty151986 (526 posts) -
[QUOTE="AmazonTreeBoa"][QUOTE="mrfrosty151986"][QUOTE="AmazonTreeBoa"] I am a hermit you clueless dumbass, so try again. Like I said, show me a console gamer that even gives a sh!t. You can't because they don't. Also, your reply leads me to believe you aren't to bright seeing that ignorance was the best response you could come up with.

Personal insults now...... Touched a nerve have I....

No dumbass, I insult everybody here all the time. It is my SW persona moron. You want the nice me, then go to OT, computer hardware, PC, or PS3 forums.

Oh dear, someone isn't getting any.....
#65 Posted by Innovazero2000 (3144 posts) -

[QUOTE="slimjimbadboy"]

[QUOTE="ronvalencia"]

Recall "Teh CELL!!!" from PS3 fanboys.

Faceoff gaming web sites e.g. DF and Eurogamer.

mrfrosty151986

Oh but haven't you heard? The bird is the word... no wait, consolites don't care about graphics.

Hahaha... is that a joke? The sheer amount of threads about graphics made by console sheep in SW is ridiculous and you say they don't care?...Hahahaha :lol:

They compare it among consoles, are you that naive? nobody outside of brainless trolls compare it to the PC's. Yet here you are day in and day out sounding like a broken record. These threads like a lot of others in SW's are a joke.

#66 Posted by mrfrosty151986 (526 posts) -

[QUOTE="RyviusARC"]

[QUOTE="AmazonTreeBoa"]I am a hermit you clueless dumbass, so try again. Like I said, show me a console gamer that even gives a sh!t. You can't because they don't. Also, your reply leads me to believe you aren't to bright seeing that ignorance was the best response you could come up with.AmazonTreeBoa

Console gamer do care when you see threads comparing Gears 3 vs Uncharted 3.

They compare the smallest detail down to pixels like in the old thread where they maginified an Alan Wake screenshot and counted the pixels to confirm it was not 720P.

No console gamers don't care. And your response clearly shows you have no clue what this thread is even about. You are comparing a console game to a console game.......herrr Derp. Seeing what I said clearly went over your head. I will explain. I am saying console gamers don't give a rats ass that PC has better graphics. Don't be so slow.

Hahaha..... Is that a joke? Sheer amount of threads made by console sheep trying to say console games are better looking then PC is unreal... :lol:

Do you have your head up your ass which has resulted in you not seeing the threads or are really just that blind? :lol:

#67 Posted by lundy86_4 (43549 posts) -

Stupid thread is stupid.

#68 Posted by mrfrosty151986 (526 posts) -
[QUOTE="mrfrosty151986"]

[QUOTE="slimjimbadboy"]

Oh but haven't you heard? The bird is the word... no wait, consolites don't care about graphics.

Innovazero2000

Hahaha... is that a joke? The sheer amount of threads about graphics made by console sheep in SW is ridiculous and you say they don't care?...Hahahaha :lol:

They compare it among consoles, are you that stupid? nobody outside of brainless trolls compare it to the PC's. Yet here you are day in and day out sounding like a broken record. These threads like a lot of others in SW's are a joke.

They compare graphics.....graphics... So obviously they do care about graphics, learn to comprehend.... D'bag :lol:
#69 Posted by Innovazero2000 (3144 posts) -

[QUOTE="Innovazero2000"][QUOTE="mrfrosty151986"]

Hahaha... is that a joke? The sheer amount of threads about graphics made by console sheep in SW is ridiculous and you say they don't care?...Hahahaha :lol:

mrfrosty151986

They compare it among consoles, are you that stupid? nobody outside of brainless trolls compare it to the PC's. Yet here you are day in and day out sounding like a broken record. These threads like a lot of others in SW's are a joke.

They compare graphics.....graphics... So obviously they do care about graphics, learn to comprehend.... D'bag :lol:

Apples to oranges, how about you comprehend. People like cars, do we compare honda's to Lamborghini? No...

Apparently you can't grip that reality, nobody(outside mindless trolls) is saying consoles look like PC's, again a broken record...

#70 Posted by mrfrosty151986 (526 posts) -

[QUOTE="mrfrosty151986"][QUOTE="Innovazero2000"] They compare it among consoles, are you that stupid? nobody outside of brainless trolls compare it to the PC's. Yet here you are day in and day out sounding like a broken record. These threads like a lot of others in SW's are a joke.Innovazero2000

They compare graphics.....graphics... So obviously they do care about graphics, learn to comprehend.... D'bag :lol:

Apples to oranges, how about you comprehend. People like cars, do we compare honda's to Lamborghini? No...

Apparently you can't grip that reality, nobody(outside mindless trolls) is saying consoles look like PC's, again a broken record...

Maybe try searching the internet... people do compare Honda's to Lambo's :lol: And there's a few morons in here trying to compare there consoles to PC http://uk.gamespot.com/forums/topic/29174585/does-any-console-game-look-even-half-as-good-as-the-best-looking-pc-games?page=0
#71 Posted by JameMcCabe (361 posts) -

This thread is so funny. You guys are pathetic, arguing over something so small and insignificant.

#72 Posted by Innovazero2000 (3144 posts) -
[QUOTE="Innovazero2000"]

[QUOTE="mrfrosty151986"] They compare graphics.....graphics... So obviously they do care about graphics, learn to comprehend.... D'bag :lol:mrfrosty151986

Apples to oranges, how about you comprehend. People like cars, do we compare honda's to Lamborghini? No...

Apparently you can't grip that reality, nobody(outside mindless trolls) is saying consoles look like PC's, again a broken record...

Maybe try searching the internet... people do compare Honda's to Lambo's :lol: And there's a few morons in here trying to compare there consoles to PC http://uk.gamespot.com/forums/topic/29174585/does-any-console-game-look-even-half-as-good-as-the-best-looking-pc-games?page=0

Who compares them, kids with some bolts on or a small turbo charger? Real car enthusiasts who understand the whole of a car is more then speed do not compare the two. Likewise, anybody with half a brain (hence trolls) do not compare the two. I have zero issues comparing console to console, but whole hearty ignore the ignorant console is as good as PC BS, much like daily threads saying the obvious PC has better graphics then console...well no ****. Instead focus your attention on the few morons who are blatantly being ridiculous. You're just turning into a hermit version of one. Got to be better then that? Nobody is going to find one that looks better then that picture because it's of higher resolution and using tessellation.
#73 Posted by clyde46 (46634 posts) -
Blah, blah, blah. PC gamers this, console gamers that. GET NEW MATERIAL!
#74 Posted by Innovazero2000 (3144 posts) -
Blah, blah, blah. PC gamers this, console gamers that. GET NEW MATERIAL!clyde46
system wars, will never happen :P
#75 Posted by mrfrosty151986 (526 posts) -
[QUOTE="mrfrosty151986"][QUOTE="Innovazero2000"]

Apples to oranges, how about you comprehend. People like cars, do we compare honda's to Lamborghini? No...

Apparently you can't grip that reality, nobody(outside mindless trolls) is saying consoles look like PC's, again a broken record...

Innovazero2000
Maybe try searching the internet... people do compare Honda's to Lambo's :lol: And there's a few morons in here trying to compare there consoles to PC http://uk.gamespot.com/forums/topic/29174585/does-any-console-game-look-even-half-as-good-as-the-best-looking-pc-games?page=0

Who compares them, kids with some bolts on or a small turbo charger? Real car enthusiasts who understand the whole of a car is more then speed do not compare the two. Likewise, anybody with half a brain (hence trolls) do not compare the two. I have zero issues comparing console to console, but whole hearty ignore the ignorant console is as good as PC BS, much like daily threads saying the obvious PC has better graphics then console...well no ****. Instead focus your attention on the few morons who are blatantly being ridiculous. You're just turning into a hermit version of one. Got to be better then that? Nobody is going to find one that looks better then that picture because it's of higher resolution and using tessellation.

It's not using tessellation :|
#76 Posted by clyde46 (46634 posts) -
[QUOTE="clyde46"]Blah, blah, blah. PC gamers this, console gamers that. GET NEW MATERIAL!Innovazero2000
system wars, will never happen :P

It used to be fun, a few years back we used to have mega threads where console gamers would be adamant that Crysis 1 could be done on the consoles. It used to be a hoot arguing with them but now these machines are 7 years old being pitted against the latest hardware from today. Theres no contest, its like picking on the special kid at school. Plus the flame bait is so obvious now.
#77 Posted by Innovazero2000 (3144 posts) -

[QUOTE="Innovazero2000"][QUOTE="mrfrosty151986"] Maybe try searching the internet... people do compare Honda's to Lambo's :lol: And there's a few morons in here trying to compare there consoles to PC http://uk.gamespot.com/forums/topic/29174585/does-any-console-game-look-even-half-as-good-as-the-best-looking-pc-games?page=0mrfrosty151986
Who compares them, kids with some bolts on or a small turbo charger? Real car enthusiasts who understand the whole of a car is more then speed do not compare the two. Likewise, anybody with half a brain (hence trolls) do not compare the two. I have zero issues comparing console to console, but whole hearty ignore the ignorant console is as good as PC BS, much like daily threads saying the obvious PC has better graphics then console...well no ****. Instead focus your attention on the few morons who are blatantly being ridiculous. You're just turning into a hermit version of one. Got to be better then that? Nobody is going to find one that looks better then that picture because it's of higher resolution and using tessellation.

It's not using tessellation :|

The textures no, but the rocks look like it's under the DX11 setting? I don't remember them looking like that otherwise. Could be wrong though =X

Still awesome to look at though.

#78 Posted by Innovazero2000 (3144 posts) -
[QUOTE="Innovazero2000"][QUOTE="clyde46"]Blah, blah, blah. PC gamers this, console gamers that. GET NEW MATERIAL!clyde46
system wars, will never happen :P

It used to be fun, a few years back we used to have mega threads where console gamers would be adamant that Crysis 1 could be done on the consoles. It used to be a hoot arguing with them but now these machines are 7 years old being pitted against the latest hardware from today. Theres no contest, its like picking on the special kid at school. Plus the flame bait is so obvious now.

touché, wave the stick and watch the fury lol
#79 Posted by straightedge_X (737 posts) -

This thread is so funny. You guys are pathetic, arguing over something so small and insignificant.

JameMcCabe
I'm going to pretend you're referring to their wienees hehe. /totallymature.
#80 Posted by gamecubepad (6120 posts) -

The KZ3 crag screens will match that. Where's a cow when you need him?

*edit*

w3iwpnw1.png

#81 Posted by AmazonTreeBoa (16745 posts) -

[QUOTE="AmazonTreeBoa"][QUOTE="RyviusARC"]

Console gamer do care when you see threads comparing Gears 3 vs Uncharted 3.

They compare the smallest detail down to pixels like in the old thread where they maginified an Alan Wake screenshot and counted the pixels to confirm it was not 720P.

mrfrosty151986

No console gamers don't care. And your response clearly shows you have no clue what this thread is even about. You are comparing a console game to a console game.......herrr Derp. Seeing what I said clearly went over your head. I will explain. I am saying console gamers don't give a rats ass that PC has better graphics. Don't be so slow.

Hahaha..... Is that a joke? Sheer amount of threads made by console sheep trying to say console games are better looking then PC is unreal... :lol:

Do you have your head up your ass which has resulted in you not seeing the threads or are really just that blind? :lol:

Those threads are made my trolls you moron. Are you actually sitting here telling me you are so stupid you actually take troll threads seriously and try to use them in your arguments? Man that's just pathetic and laughable as hell. You truly are an idiot.
#82 Posted by AmazonTreeBoa (16745 posts) -
[QUOTE="mrfrosty151986"][QUOTE="AmazonTreeBoa"][QUOTE="mrfrosty151986"] Personal insults now...... Touched a nerve have I....

No dumbass, I insult everybody here all the time. It is my SW persona moron. You want the nice me, then go to OT, computer hardware, PC, or PS3 forums.

Oh dear, someone isn't getting any.....

Well if you got outside more, you might get some. But you telling me about it isn't going to help your chances. Maybe someday you'll actually have it living with you like I do.
#83 Posted by Jankarcop (9629 posts) -

How come consolites are allowed to make gfx threads, even against the Wii...but if PC does it against little consoles we get yelled at.

#84 Posted by princeofshapeir (14277 posts) -

How come consolites are allowed to make gfx threads, even against the Wii...but if PC does it against little consoles we get yelled at.

Jankarcop
They hate to be reminded that they will always be in second place.
#85 Posted by Peredith (2310 posts) -

Pfft, real life looks better :cool: :P

ibfRh5yvTEbHmx.jpg

Oh wait, that's Crysis 2? :shock:

#86 Posted by OhSnapitz (18458 posts) -

Find me a 2005 PC that can run that.. :|

#87 Posted by Innovazero2000 (3144 posts) -

Find me a 2005 PC that can run that.. :|

OhSnapitz
You won't, not at that resolution...but neither will consoles, Maybe next gen?
#88 Posted by princeofshapeir (14277 posts) -

Find me a 2005 PC that can run that.. :|

OhSnapitz
Find me a console that can run Crysis 2 at a playable framerate with decent graphics.
#89 Posted by dream431ca (10165 posts) -

Is that how you play games? Staring at textures? Are you a gamer or a poser?

#90 Posted by clyde46 (46634 posts) -

Is that how you play games? Staring at textures? Are you a gamer or a poser?

dream431ca
Gotta get that forum swag somehow.
#91 Posted by Jebus213 (8896 posts) -

Is that how you play games? Staring at textures? Are you a gamer or a poser?

dream431ca

you're so COOL!!!!!

#92 Posted by Riadon2 (1609 posts) -

Good PC Textures:

iQYyD6OLXOfEc.bmp

ibwplUKhpGubtV.bmp

"Good" Console textures:

new_uc3_3d_2.bmp.jpg

Gamespot screws with image size, open them in a new tab.

#93 Posted by OhSnapitz (18458 posts) -

You won't, not at that resolution...but neither will consoles, Maybe next gen?Innovazero2000

So why compare it in the first place? :|

Find me a console that can run Crysis 2 at a playable framerate with decent graphics. princeofshapeir

Well it seems neither GS or MC had a problem with its "playable frame rate" or "decent graphics".. so try again.

#94 Posted by 1080pOnly (1986 posts) -

This thread is so funny. You guys are pathetic, arguing over something so small and insignificant.

JameMcCabe

I don't recall the TC's genetalia being mentioned...

#95 Posted by princeofshapeir (14277 posts) -

[QUOTE="Innovazero2000"] You won't, not at that resolution...but neither will consoles, Maybe next gen?OhSnapitz

So why compare it in the first place? :|

Find me a console that can run Crysis 2 at a playable framerate with decent graphics. princeofshapeir

Well it seems neither GS or MC had a problem with its "playable frame rate" or "decent graphics".. so try again.

The two terms are subjective and their standards have been lowered considerably thanks to this prolonged console generation, but for me I define a playable framerate as anything above 35 FPS and decent graphics as fairly high-resolution textures and lack of pop-in and screen tearing. We all know that Crysis 2 on consoles has abominable frame rates that regularly plummet below 20 FPS and lots of screen tear and pop-in.
#96 Posted by AmazonTreeBoa (16745 posts) -
[QUOTE="mrfrosty151986"]

[QUOTE="AmazonTreeBoa"] No console gamers don't care. And your response clearly shows you have no clue what this thread is even about. You are comparing a console game to a console game.......herrr Derp. Seeing what I said clearly went over your head. I will explain. I am saying console gamers don't give a rats ass that PC has better graphics. Don't be so slow.AmazonTreeBoa

Hahaha..... Is that a joke? Sheer amount of threads made by console sheep trying to say console games are better looking then PC is unreal... :lol:

Do you have your head up your ass which has resulted in you not seeing the threads or are really just that blind? :lol:

Those threads are made my trolls you moron. Are you actually sitting here telling me you are so stupid you actually take troll threads seriously and try to use them in your arguments? Man that's just pathetic and laughable as hell. You truly are an idiot.

Well answer me. Don't run away now. :lol::lol:
#97 Posted by jun_aka_pekto (16417 posts) -

The KZ3 crag screens will match that. Where's a cow when you need him?

*edit*

gamecubepad

Is there any other texture that detailed in the KZ games? I already saw similar textures near the beginning of KZ3. I even took a screenshot. Are there any more? I can't recall seeing better textures and I'm near the end of the jungle level in KZ3.

KZ3-Cap-10.png

Oh wait. I got this too. It's nice while looking down. But, as soon as I stare straight ahead, the texture quality seems to take a nosedive.

KZ3-Cap-19-1.png

#98 Posted by ShadowMoses900 (17081 posts) -

I still think Uncharted 3/2, Killzone 3/2, and God of War 3 are the best looking games ever made. You can also put The Last of Us and God of War Acension up there as well.

But all systems have good looking games, except for the Wii but that's for the obvious reason that it was a last gen system.

#99 Posted by MonsieurX (30474 posts) -

I still think Uncharted 3/2, Killzone 3/2, and God of War 3 are the best looking games ever made. You can also put The Last of Us and God of War Acension up there as well.

ShadowMoses900
Ever made? :lol:
#100 Posted by ShadowMoses900 (17081 posts) -

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

I still think Uncharted 3/2, Killzone 3/2, and God of War 3 are the best looking games ever made. You can also put The Last of Us and God of War Acension up there as well.

MonsieurX

Ever made? :lol:

Yes.