COD Ghosts on PC is an absolute rubbish, buggy PC port.

  • 133 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for ReadingRainbow4
ReadingRainbow4

18733

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By ReadingRainbow4
Member since 2012 • 18733 Posts

Apparently Activision even sent a cease and desist notice to the creators of a 3rd party FOV hack, it's no longer available.

User made hacks and tweaks are the only thing keeping this semi-playable, That still doesn't come close to fixing the issues with this title.

Avatar image for Netret0120
Netret0120

3594

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#2  Edited By Netret0120
Member since 2013 • 3594 Posts

Hope they fix it soon

Avatar image for freedomfreak
freedomfreak

52427

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 freedomfreak
Member since 2004 • 52427 Posts

Who did the port?

Avatar image for GioVela2010
GioVela2010

5566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 GioVela2010
Member since 2008 • 5566 Posts

The frustrations of PC gaming

Avatar image for psymon100
psymon100

6835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 psymon100
Member since 2012 • 6835 Posts

A few people complaining about BF4 too. These people just need to up their specs. I mean, I'm playing on a high end rig. Pentium G2120, Intel HD graphics, Windows Vista. I get a solid 20fps with no crashes.

Avatar image for ReadingRainbow4
ReadingRainbow4

18733

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#6  Edited By ReadingRainbow4
Member since 2012 • 18733 Posts

@freedomfreak said:

Who did the port?

Pretty sure it was just IW. I'm only calling it a port because the games total crap on the pc without user fixes and that doesn't even come close to fixing all of the issues this game has.

Treyarch is just so much better.

Avatar image for R4gn4r0k
R4gn4r0k

46292

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 R4gn4r0k
Member since 2004 • 46292 Posts

Really? It doesn't look better than previous COD games yet it manages to bring Xbone, PS4 AND TITAN to its knees :|

@freedomfreak said:

Who did the port?

Infinity Ward. The ones that made some of the best PC games of all time: Call of Duty 1 & 2. And before that they made MOH:AA as 2015 inc.

No, lol, they are just Infinity Ward by name, I have no clue who these guys are but they are certainly not the IW of old.

Avatar image for godspellwh
GodspellWH

1078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#8  Edited By GodspellWH
Member since 2013 • 1078 Posts

COD Ghost is having problems on all platforms but I'm sure it will be patch soon

Avatar image for ReadingRainbow4
ReadingRainbow4

18733

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#9 ReadingRainbow4
Member since 2012 • 18733 Posts

@psymon100 said:

A few people complaining about BF4 too. These people just need to up their specs. I mean, I'm playing on a high end rig. Pentium G2120, Intel HD graphics, Windows Vista. I get a solid 20fps with no crashes.

hahaha, nice.

Avatar image for freedomfreak
freedomfreak

52427

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10  Edited By freedomfreak
Member since 2004 • 52427 Posts
@ReadingRainbow4 said:

Pretty sure it was just IW. I'm only calling it a port because the games total crap on the pc without user fixes and that doesn't even come close to fixing all of the issues this game has.

Treyarch is just so much better.

Oh, a shame it's not working properly then. That's messed up. I've read quite a few articles myself of how bad it can be.

I haven't checked the multiplayer, but it's running fine on 360 so far. Did have a fucking huge patch though.

Avatar image for Joedgabe
Joedgabe

5134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#11 Joedgabe
Member since 2006 • 5134 Posts

wow.. COD ghost is looking worse and worse by the day.......

x___x how can they mess up on the same game they've been developing for the last 6 years ?

Avatar image for lawlessx
lawlessx

48753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#12 lawlessx
Member since 2004 • 48753 Posts

@GioVela2010 said:

The frustrations of PC gaming

remember the black ops release? when both the PC and the PS3 version had issues while the 360 version ran fine?

didn't think so

Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts

Its MW2 all over again.

Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#15 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

max settings, dat water, so real

IW finally realized no one really cares for cod on PC

Avatar image for R4gn4r0k
R4gn4r0k

46292

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16  Edited By R4gn4r0k
Member since 2004 • 46292 Posts

@clyde46 said:

Its MW2 all over again.

But with that game we knew in advance that features would be cut. With this one they said in advance it was going to be the best version.

@kingoflife9 said:

PS4 definitive version confirmed

the hermits have been owned.

The PS4 version doesn't look like a last gen game ?

Avatar image for ReadingRainbow4
ReadingRainbow4

18733

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#17 ReadingRainbow4
Member since 2012 • 18733 Posts

I don't understand why they couldn't learn from Treyarch.

Is it just arrogance? Wtf is the reason for any of this.

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

@kingoflife9 said:

PS4 definitive version confirmed

the hermits have been owned.

based on what?

Avatar image for R4gn4r0k
R4gn4r0k

46292

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#20 R4gn4r0k
Member since 2004 • 46292 Posts

@ReadingRainbow4 said:

I don't understand why they couldn't learn from Treyarch.

Is it just arrogance? Wtf is the reason for any of this.

It's COD. They can ask 10 dollars more and put no effort in it whatsoever and it'll sell on name alone. Look at it: it's #1 on steam...

Avatar image for mems_1224
mems_1224

56919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 mems_1224
Member since 2004 • 56919 Posts

@psymon100 said:

A few people complaining about BF4 too. These people just need to up their specs. I mean, I'm playing on a high end rig. Pentium G2120, Intel HD graphics, Windows Vista. I get a solid 20fps with no crashes.

20fps? so its basically like playing dark souls?

Avatar image for treedoor
treedoor

7648

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 treedoor
Member since 2004 • 7648 Posts

Ever since MW2 I'm surprised people on PC even buy CoD

Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#23 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts

@wis3boi said:

max settings, dat water, so real

IW finally realized no one really cares for cod on PC

What..... the ...... ****....

Avatar image for R4gn4r0k
R4gn4r0k

46292

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#24 R4gn4r0k
Member since 2004 • 46292 Posts

@kingoflife9 said:

definitely not, have you seen jack frags gameplay of the ps4 version on youtube? looks magnificent

I haven't. I might watch it when I have some time to spare.

But IW said they would make PC the best looking version of the game. I can't believe the PS4 version looks better.

Avatar image for psymon100
psymon100

6835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25  Edited By psymon100
Member since 2012 • 6835 Posts

@mems_1224 said:

@psymon100 said:

A few people complaining about BF4 too. These people just need to up their specs. I mean, I'm playing on a high end rig. Pentium G2120, Intel HD graphics, Windows Vista. I get a solid 20fps with no crashes.

20fps? so its basically like playing dark souls?

Oh no, there is no way it is even close to being that awesome.

Avatar image for wolverine4262
wolverine4262

20832

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 wolverine4262
Member since 2004 • 20832 Posts

The 5 or so minutes I watched of that gave off the strong impression that that guy just bought the game so he could whine about it.

If you want IW to stop rehashing the same thing, then stop giving them your dollar, like me.

Avatar image for freedomfreak
freedomfreak

52427

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 freedomfreak
Member since 2004 • 52427 Posts
@treedoor said:

Ever since MW2 I'm surprised people on PC even buy CoD

lol@buying COD in the first place.

Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#28  Edited By wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

@freedomfreak said:
@treedoor said:

Ever since MW2 I'm surprised people on PC even buy CoD

lol@buying COD in the first place.

wise decision

Avatar image for ReadingRainbow4
ReadingRainbow4

18733

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#29  Edited By ReadingRainbow4
Member since 2012 • 18733 Posts

@wolverine4262 said:

The 5 or so minutes I watched of that gave off the strong impression that that guy just bought the game so he could whine about it.

If you want IW to stop rehashing the same thing, then stop giving them your dollar, like me.

He's also spreading the information that it's a throwaway pc port, I think that's justification enough.

Most of the time to get that information yourself actually requires buying the game. People want to know wyt piracy is so prevalent in this industry, this one of the reasons.

Avatar image for Snugenz
Snugenz

13388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 Snugenz
Member since 2006 • 13388 Posts

It is a bit stuttery while panning the camera or moving into a new area though i only tried the SP so far.

Some shots, max everything (Nvidia only stuff aswell) @1080p

Not the worst looking game but nothing special, other aspects need alot of work aswell like this crazy mouse acceleration that occurs now and again and the horrible FOV.

Avatar image for kipsta77
kipsta77

1119

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 kipsta77
Member since 2012 • 1119 Posts

Whoever has a gaming PC and is wasting their time with COD....

Shame on you.

Avatar image for freedomfreak
freedomfreak

52427

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 freedomfreak
Member since 2004 • 52427 Posts

Oh man. I love that wall. Game has some crazy moments, and I love using Riley to **** SHIT UP ON THE REAL

Avatar image for R4gn4r0k
R4gn4r0k

46292

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#33 R4gn4r0k
Member since 2004 • 46292 Posts

@Snugenz said:

It is a bit stuttery while panning the camera or moving into a new area though i only tried the SP so far.

Some shots, max everything (Nvidia only stuff aswell) @1080p

Not the worst looking game but nothing special, other aspects need alot of work aswell like this crazy mouse acceleration that occurs now and again and the horrible FOV.

Those look good actually. Doesn't justify a GTX780, 50GB of space and 6GB of RAM but still.

Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#34 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

LOL @ this message for people running fewer than 8gb ram. Ghosts is a mess and they lied about their requirements

Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#35 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts

@Snugenz said:

It is a bit stuttery while panning the camera or moving into a new area though i only tried the SP so far.

Some shots, max everything (Nvidia only stuff aswell) @1080p

Not the worst looking game but nothing special, other aspects need alot of work aswell like this crazy mouse acceleration that occurs now and again and the horrible FOV.

So this is IW interpretation of next gen graphics? Now I can see where all the fucking budget went.....

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#36  Edited By lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

@kipsta77 said:

Whoever has a gaming PC and is wasting their time with COD....

Shame on you.

why?

Avatar image for Dreams-Visions
Dreams-Visions

26578

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 Dreams-Visions
Member since 2006 • 26578 Posts

CoD: Ghosts platform tier list:

S tier: N/A

A tier: N/A

B tier: PC

Horribly optimised. Requires 4x the amount of RAM it actually uses.

B- tier: PS4

1080p but with framerate issues.

C tier: Xbox One

720p. May or may not have framerate issues.

D tier: Xbox 360

Sub-shitty resolution but stable 60 fps framerate

F tier: PS3

Sub-shitty resolution with framerate drops

Avatar image for AmazonTreeBoa
AmazonTreeBoa

16745

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 AmazonTreeBoa
Member since 2011 • 16745 Posts

This is why I am waiting to see what Treyarch's CoD game is like. IW is a joke anymore. A shell of their former self.

Avatar image for Heil68
Heil68

60714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#40 Heil68
Member since 2004 • 60714 Posts

That's too bad, hopefully the sales will suffer from it.

Avatar image for kemar7856
kemar7856

11783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#41  Edited By kemar7856
Member since 2004 • 11783 Posts

maybe this is just one of those times were the developers int care about the pc version and put all their resources with the ps4/xb1

Avatar image for ReadingRainbow4
ReadingRainbow4

18733

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#42 ReadingRainbow4
Member since 2012 • 18733 Posts

Can anyone post some pictures of the Nvidia exclusive dog fur? lol.

Avatar image for R4gn4r0k
R4gn4r0k

46292

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#43 R4gn4r0k
Member since 2004 • 46292 Posts

@kingoflife9 said:

I was referring to battlefield, but I have seen gameplay of pc, x1, and ps4 versions of call of duty, let me just say they all look like shit, I never played a battlefield game before but will play bf4 with my ps4 bundle. You can have the best high end graphics in the world but it won't mean shit if the game doesn't have good animation, after all somebody has to draw the environments....cod looks bad on current gen consoles and on high end pc.

At least there is no shitty Vita version made by Nihilistic this time :P

You made the right choice. BF4 is the better shooter and actually looks next gen as well. It's got some pretty amazing animations as did BF3.

Avatar image for R4gn4r0k
R4gn4r0k

46292

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#44 R4gn4r0k
Member since 2004 • 46292 Posts

@kemar7856 said:

maybe this is just one of those times were the developers int care about the pc version and put all their resources with the ps4/xb1

Except they clearly didn't.

@ReadingRainbow4 said:

Can anyone post some pictures of the Nvidia exclusive dog fur? lol.

LMAO, that will probably bring the game down to 1 FPS.

Avatar image for Snugenz
Snugenz

13388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 Snugenz
Member since 2006 • 13388 Posts

@ReadingRainbow4 said:

Can anyone post some pictures of the Nvidia exclusive dog fur? lol.

That's the only shot of the dog i have :P

Avatar image for NameIess_One
NameIess_One

1077

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 NameIess_One
Member since 2013 • 1077 Posts

@Snugenz said:

It is a bit stuttery while panning the camera or moving into a new area though i only tried the SP so far.

Some shots, max everything (Nvidia only stuff aswell) @1080p

Not the worst looking game but nothing special, other aspects need alot of work aswell like this crazy mouse acceleration that occurs now and again and the horrible FOV.

Such a mediocre looking game... what a disaster to force 6 GB of RAM as a minimum requirement for running it, glad they got caught with their pants down by the modders.

I still don't get the logic behind it, though... by inflating system requirements, aren't they making an already small CoD fanbase on the PC even smaller?

Avatar image for MonsieurX
MonsieurX

39858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 MonsieurX
Member since 2008 • 39858 Posts

lol CoD

Avatar image for Snugenz
Snugenz

13388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48  Edited By Snugenz
Member since 2006 • 13388 Posts

@NameIess_One said:

@Snugenz said:

It is a bit stuttery while panning the camera or moving into a new area though i only tried the SP so far.

Some shots, max everything (Nvidia only stuff aswell) @1080p

Not the worst looking game but nothing special, other aspects need alot of work aswell like this crazy mouse acceleration that occurs now and again and the horrible FOV.

Such a mediocre looking game... what a disaster to force 6 GB of RAM as a minimum requirement for running it, glad they got caught with their pants down by the modders.

I still don't get the logic behind it, though... by inflating system requirements, aren't they making an already small CoD fanbase on the PC even smaller?

The fucked up thing is that those requirements are actually required, even my rig is having issues with this game, it's no wonder the X1 and PS4 are having notable issues aswell.

All in all its just a badly made game. I was playing BF4 SP while i was waiting for this to download, and it's a generational (like) difference between em.

Avatar image for NameIess_One
NameIess_One

1077

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 NameIess_One
Member since 2013 • 1077 Posts

@R4gn4r0k said:

@ReadingRainbow4 said:

Can anyone post some pictures of the Nvidia exclusive dog fur? lol.

LMAO, that will probably bring the game down to 1 FPS.

Right now, I'm playing Arkham Origins, and PhysX works surprisingly well, my 670 GTX can handle it with no problems... who knows, maybe they're finally learning to optimize it properly.

Avatar image for ReadingRainbow4
ReadingRainbow4

18733

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#50 ReadingRainbow4
Member since 2012 • 18733 Posts

@NameIess_One said:

@R4gn4r0k said:

@ReadingRainbow4 said:

Can anyone post some pictures of the Nvidia exclusive dog fur? lol.

LMAO, that will probably bring the game down to 1 FPS.

Right now, I'm playing Arkham Origins, and PhysX works surprisingly well, my 670 GTX can handle it with no problems... who knows, maybe they're finally learning to optimize it properly.

arkham origins runs so much better than City, that games DX11 optimization Sucked so bad.