Looks OK . Graphics aren't anything special , you can clearly see low res shadows here and there . The game still feels like on rail shooter with scripted events after scripted events . Not convinced yet , may be gameplay will change my mind . Haven't even touched touched COD game for over 2 years now .
None of that sci fi stuff will be useful because the game will be linear and you'll only be able to use gadgets when the game will tell you . You still won't be able to carry more than 2 weapons , or use gadgets like old shooters . They should go a bit non linear with this series .
You know damn well that does graphics look good. I know that it is a COD, but that does not make it ugly. I hope that you are wrong about the gameplay because we do need more open levels.
Sorry but I am not "Oh look COD , so automatically it sucks" kinda guy . Just look at the trailer carefully , low res shadows here and there in the trailer . Those fire and smoke effects on bridge are also same old flat effects that rotate to face camera , those are not volumetric effects like benchmark games . Rest of the game looks linear as usual , any high end game from 4-5 years ago have better character models than those . Graphics are not bad but lot of games already look better .
Well, I am not going to debate with you. I do not know everything that goes in to graphics, so I know that I am out of my league. However, I still think that it looks better than most of what has been shown on current gen. I also did not meant to suggest that you were intentionally bashing it because it was a COD game, but as people we tend to unconsciously show bias towards certain things because we have come to expect less from them, at least that is how i feel sometimes. Once again, I apologize.
Log in to comment